The similarity of the books “The Count of Monte Cristo” and “Blessings” is that the authors are explaining what is happening that makes the characters
The themes of both books are both knowledge is power. Both of the settings are around the same time period and they are dystopias. Finally, the characters of the two stories are both lifeless wives and the main characters are against the society. This shows how the two stories are similar by themes, settings, and
There are several similarities as well as differences in the way the authors of The Count of Monte Cristo and Blessings developed a theme. The theme of The Count of Monte Cristo is to never give up hope. The theme of Blessings is to be willing to open yourself up to others. Both authors developed these themes through the actions of the main characters and in the conclusion of the passage. One of the differences in the development of both themes is that Alexandre Dumas sheds light on the thought process of the main character in The Count of Monte Cristo, while Mary Hall Surface provides limited information about what the main characters may be thinking in Blessings.
From my perspective, I believe that both stories show us that no matter what bad situation you are in there is always a solution to be happy. I can see love, respect and strong woman the authors is talking about, that they choose to give a better life to their kids. The similarities that I have found in these two stories are basically the love of a mother towards their children and teach them that even if you love someone and that person is hurting you, you need to move on to provide a better life.
Both of these authors wrote science fiction for the most part. They both really liked to write with a very imaginative style. In this they both created story with a lot of personification and out of this world personalities. Both of their writing were very suspenseful in: “There Will Come Soft Rains” and “The Tell Tale Heart”. Both of these stories in some way end off pretty sad or scary in a way and have a very suspenseful spot or a large peak in a story.
What is a hero? To most, it’s probably the classic superhero- the one with superpowers and can fly. To others, it might be a fictional character with a magic wand or a demigod in a prophecy. To some, it might be a real life person- a famous one or the ones who raised you.
It talked about how each and everyone was touched by the words that those heroes said. Which people think is the most bravest and the most amazing people could do. For example, both stories talked about amazing people who saved lives. Which they think people could do in the future forever and ever. Both of these stories persuaded people to follow these amazing heroes dreams and follow the path of greatness.
Top of Form Growing up as a Mexican catholic I never did understand why I was always told to pray for a certain peace of art. I would see others do it which made me believe that it was the normal thing to do, along with seeing the same art piece around my whole house, but time is what lead me to understand that praying to that certain art piece was not what everyone did but what most Catholics did. I understood that the Virgin de Guadalupe (Virgin Mary) was a certain peace of art that most Mexican people believed in, what my people believed in. Because this art piece represents my people I choose to analysis the Virgin Mary which is hanging in the Basilica of our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City. I certainly believe this piece of art is
Another item that is extremely important in both stories is the use and importance of fate. Both characters rely on their fates for assistance and for achieving
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
Serena, the main character in the second story, is a cold-hearted huntress, while the Guard from the first story was sympathetic and protective. Many of the characters are unnamed, as most of the stories are written from a first person perspective. Another thing I found intriguing was the brevity of the chapters, only lasting a few pages. At times, the stories could be vague and confusing because of how short the chapters were, but a few of the stories did not need more than a page or two to tell the
The outcome of her hopes and wishes resulted in her life. Therefore, a message or theme can be drawn for both of the passages. The theme that I got from two stories is that not everything is what it looks like or portrays to
Symbolism is used differently in both works, nevertheless symbolism is an important part in the two texts. Shirley Jackson uses dialogue throughout the story to provide the background information to inform the readers what's going on. Without this craft move the problem of the story would be hard to recognize. Suzanne Collins uses dramatic irony to provide the readers background information. Lastly, Jackson uses inner thinking to get the readers predicting.
Both pieces of literature have messages of enlightenment, but each piece focuses on a specific
Marriage in Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure (1668) and Dorothy Leigh’s The Mother’s Blessing (1616) For a woman in seventeenth-century England, there were two things she was expected to do in her life: to get married, and to have children. And those are exactly the themes that Marriage in Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure (1668) and Dorothy Leigh’s The Mother’s Blessing (1616) deal with. Starting with Margaret Cavendish, her play The Convent of Pleasure was published in 1668 as a closet play, which means that despite being a play, it was not written with the intent of it being performed on a stage in front of an audience, but rather to be read in small groups.
