A Doll's House By Henrik Ibsen: Article Analysis

This article begins by taking a gander at the goal of A Doll's House and asserts that, contrary to what many individuals think, Ibsen never expected to compose a about woman's rights. The article goes on to argue that the skylark Nora of the first two acts could never realistically make the transformation that she makes in the third act, turning into the "recently fledged feminist" and that Nora is really a case study for female hysteria (29). Templeton discusses how Torvald's pet names (lark, squirrel) give her a "strong animal character" that prevents her from understanding the ethical issues that humans face (30). In another attack on Nora's character, Templeton calls out the honest of Nora's character, first bringing up her deceitfulness

The article goes on to discuss inspiration for A Doll's House, which included one of his few close female friends. One of her sources states that, "A Doll House represents a woman instilled with the idea of turning into a person, yet it proposes nothing categorical about ladies getting to be individuals; in fact, its real topic has nothing to do with the sexes" (28). Templeton's sources use the argument that Ibsen was composing Nora to represent "Everyman" except Templeton disagrees. Many trust that Nora was not meant to be a symbol of feminism, but rather a symbol of strengthening for each person of the time period. While many individuals have taken a gander at Ibsen as a saint of the feminist development, I disagree with Templeton's claim that A Doll's House is a ladylike statement. On the off chance that A Doll's House were meant to be a feminist proclamation with Nora finally standing up and leaving at last, Ibsen would have made Nora's progression as a woman more professed and more drastic. As I would like to think, Ibsen was making a more generalist statement about freedom and honest