In his book, "A Land So Strange: The Epic Journey of Cabeza de Vaca," Andrés Reséndez tells the story of the Spanish explorer Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca and journey across the American continent in the early 16th century (Reséndez 1). Reséndez provides a detailed account of this journey as they overcome their environment and interact with a variety of native peoples. A land so strange is a memorable and engaging story that portrays cross-cultural interactions and the impact of these interactions on those involved. The story is split into three parts. The first part, "The Journey," describes the Narvaez expedition and its aftermath, including the shipwreck that separated Cabeza de Vaca and his companions from the rest of the crew. The second …show more content…
The locals provide the explorers with resources to launch another expedition to America. While the second expedition proved to fail, the explorers' journey had a large influence on the history of America, and their interactions with the native tribes are still studied and discussed by scholars today. Part of what makes “A Land So Strange” a good story is the way Reséndez illustrates the struggles of Cabeza de Vaca's journey. Cabeza de Vaca and the other explorers are in a constant battle for survival, having to face harsh weather from both ends of the thermometer. They are forced to survive only on what they could find, such as acorns, berries, or even the flesh from their own horses. Out of the many native tribe the explorers encounter on their journey, only some of which were friendly. Reséndez also places Cabeza de Vaca's journey within the larger context of the Spanish conquest of the Americas very well. He shows how the expedition was not just a European conquest over Native American civilizations, but rather a complex knot of alliances, conflicts, and misunderstandings. He also shows how Cabeza de Vaca's experiences challenged many of the assumptions that the Spanish had about the native peoples they encountered, and how his observations would contribute to a better understanding of the native cultures of the …show more content…
One such limitation is its emphasis on Cabeza de Vaca and his companions' perspectives, which can sometimes lead to a narrow and Eurocentric view of interactions between Europeans and indigenous peoples. For example, Reséndez portrays indigenous peoples as passive or primitive, with little agency or complexity. This is clear from his description of the Coahuiltecans, who he describes as "roaming around like animals, seeking food" (Reséndez 136). This type of portrayal risks perpetuating negative stereotypes about indigenous people while also obscuring the complexities of their cultures and their agency in interactions with