A & P By John Updike Analysis

1270 Words6 Pages

The unwritten law that thoughts inevitaby define someone’s actions has taken root in society over the years. This further begs the question of whether people should be judged by their thoughts rather than their actions. Some even believe that since most individuals act on what they have think about, then there is little to no significant difference between having certain thoughts and acting on them, where the end result is concerned. However, this generalization is clearly flawed as human thoughts are not within our immediate control and that there is no immediate causal relationship between how one thinks and acts. John Updike’s “A & P” suggests how action speaks louder than thoughts, which is depicted through Sammy, who is inspired by three unconventional girls to quit his job. First and foremost, Sammy is under the delusion …show more content…

He firmly confronts Lengel and says that he “didn’t have to embarrass them” (289). At this point, Sammy puts his thoughts into action by directly expressing his dislike for absurd rules that don’t make sense, especially ones concerning the need to judge someone based on what they wear. Some may argue that Sammy was once again being a hypocrite as he objectifies the girls from the very beginning, and even compares their body parts innappropriately to “two [of] the smoothest scoops of vanilla” (289). There is no doubt that if Sammy had expressed his thoughts to the girls, then Lengel and him would not be any different. However, Lengel acts on his beliefs while Sammy does not. Their decisions had distinct consequences. Therefore, to penalize him for having indecent thoughts is unfair because he was merely being human. While Sammy does not act on his perverted thoughts of the girls, he is able to muster the courage to face an authoratative figure and this is key to his escape from the life of a