In society, today many movies have a certain depiction of lack of poverty, usually between a single woman and her children. Women are usually the ones who are supposed to be dependent on the male figure in the household, but when one is not present, she must help her children and her alone. I have chosen to do a rhetorical analysis on the movie “Erin Brockovich” because being in poverty is one of the social issues present. This movie was released in 200, but the true-story occurred during the early 90’s. Poverty being the social issue started from Erin having a lack of education and unemployment. The movie begins with Julia Roberts, Erin Brockovich, who is a single mother with 3 children gets into a car accident that was not her fault. She became injured in the accident and wants to sue the doctor who ran into her. She ends up hiring an attorney, Ed Masry, and they go to court to try and win their case, but they …show more content…
After the case closes he will not return her calls and she goes to the law firm and confronts him. Things did not work out for her and she needs a job now. She gets the job and immediately she receives files on a real-estate case that says the Pacific Gas and Eletric Company offering to buy a home owned by Donna Jensen, who is a resident of the county in California. She ends up reading all of Donna’s medical files and goes to meet and talk with her about what is going on. Donna tells Erin about the chromium which is what the power plant uses. Erin begins digging into the case more and finds evidence that the groundwater in Hinkley county is seriously contaminated with carcinogenic hexavalent chromium, but PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric) has been telling Hinkley county residents that they use a safer form of chromium. Ed ends up firing her from not being at the office, until he finds out what she has been doing. The chromium in the water