ipl-logo

A Strong Central Government Pros And Cons Essay

507 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Jefferson vs madison views

When the Founding Fathers were planning the country, each one had different ideas on what the country should be like. Some favored a strong central government, others saw that strength in the states would make for a better government. Most of the time, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison are seen as the two biggest influences, and opposing views on the role of the federal government. Jefferson opted for a weaker central government, with stronger states and more individual rights, while Madison favored a strong central government, and weaker states. Given that the country was founded on ideas of liberty and democracy, Thomas Jefferson is the more correct of the two. Madison represented the party known as the Federalists. He was an elitist who believed that the most fit to rule would rise into the national …show more content…

As the name implies, this party was quite the opposite of the Federalists. The DR party was populist, meaning they believed in representing the common people. This party believe that there should not be a strong central government, and that power should be mostly held by the states. This strength of this system would be that it would allow states to conduct their own business, and be able to more appropriately and quickly solve matters of local and state importance, while keeping freedoms that could be taken by a central government. Both of these systems have their pros and cons, and as such a mix of both is preferable. The idea of the country is in the name, the United States of America, and as such we do need a central government to truly be united. This central government would need certain powers, which were granted by the Constitution. However, the world has changed a lot since then. The Constitution granted the central government the power to do whatever is, “necessary and proper,” but that vague wording has allowed the federal government to grow over the

Show More
Related

Constitution Guards Against Tyranny In The Summer Of 1787

282 Words | 2 Pages

In the summer of 1787, the new government of the United States of America realized that there was a problem with their current government. Many parts of the constitution guards against tyranny because the new constitution has checks and balances, the separation of powers and federalism. The original problem that was called to the attention of the old government was the articles of confederation were very weak, and they needed to create a strong central government. According to document A, a quote by James Madison states, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will controlled by itself.” The central and state government will work together, which shows federalism.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

544 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation provided the United States with a predominantly ineffective government that could not deal with problems at home and abroad. The country was unable to regulate commerce and effectively deal with foreign nations from 1781 to 1789. Although there were some advantages to the first constitution, the issues caused by the document greatly outweighed the benefits. The Articles of Confederation limited America’s ability to deal problems within its own borders and with foreign nations.

Read More

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

703 Words | 3 Pages

“The different governments will each control each other at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Doc A, Madison,James, Federalist Paper 51, 1788). Each part of the government had there own jobs to do, for example the central government has the power to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, while the state government set up local governments, holds elections,

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

Read More

Opposing Views Of Howard Zinn And Gordon S. Wood

1418 Words | 6 Pages

He believed the local state assemblies abused their powers, only spoke for their local interest, changed their membership constantly, and enacted unjust laws. He believed ratifying the Constitution to a strong central government was the only option for the young country to succeed. Madison adopted David Hume’s idea, a strong republican government might perform better in a large setting rather that a small one. He convinced the American public of this idea through a series called the Federalist Papers. Madison thought a citizen’s rights were more protected with a central government rather than a local state government.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thomas Jefferson And The Federalist

1158 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Jefferson- one of the great American founding fathers with exquisite taste in architecture and French wine, but also known to hold a controversial set of ideas- fought frequently and strongly against the Federalists ideas before he achieved Presidency. Jefferson and the other republican democrats who followed suit held the belief that the powers of the federal government should be left strictly to what is granted to them in the Constitution. Those powers not specifically addressed in the Constitution would then be delegated to the state governments. This is to ensure that the federal government did not have too much power as they believe a country runs best under a form of self-government.

Read More

A Strong National Government Dbq

295 Words | 2 Pages

that having a strong national government would be ideal to protect those areas (Federalist Party).Hamilton strongly believed in this concept and fought for a strong national government that would make the country, as a whole, stronger than if the individual states had all the power. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were the leaders of the Democratic-Republican party. They believed that the states should stay independent because they did not want to go back into a government they had when they were ruled by the British. The Articles of Confederation was the first “Constitution”. While the Articles of Confederation were in effect, all the “states were independent and they remained sovereign” (Articles of Confederation).

Read More

Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Give More Power To The Government Than The States

677 Words | 3 Pages

When the United States of America began to fight the Revolutionary War in 1775, they would need a governing body to run the new country. However, seeing as they had just escaped from a tyrannical government under England, the Articles of Confederation gave the states a very large amount of power so that they would not have the same problem again. However, although this government gave many states what they wanted, it was not strong enough to run a country. So, when writing a new Constitution the founding fathers gave more power to the federal government than the states because of the former government.

Read More

Comparing The Contributions Of James Madison And Alexander Hamilton

1501 Words | 7 Pages

Many Americans do not realize the political uproar our country was in between the end of the Revolutionary War and the signing of the Constitution. The Confederation was collapsing and plunging into debt, and had no real authority to do anything about it. Many political figures realized that in order for this country, and the revolution, to survive there needed to be a stronger central government. Among our country's founding fathers there was one man in particular that stood out from the rest, mostly attributed to his role leading up to and during the drafting of the constitution: James Madison. This is not to say that key players such as George Washington and Andrew Jackson didn’t contribute, but Madison seemed to rise above the crowd.

Read More

Most Famous Federalist Paper: The Articles Of Confederation

323 Words | 2 Pages

Madison began discussing the most famous Federalist papers by saying that one of the most grounded contentions for the Constitution is the way that it sets up an administration well-appointed for controlling the violence and harm created by factions. Madison characterizes groups as gatherings of individuals who assemble to secure and advance their exceptional monetary hobbies and political feelings. According to the text, Madison has only two ways to control a faction. The first was to remove its reasons and the second way was to control its outcomes.

Read More

Thomas Jefferson And Alexander Hamilton

801 Words | 4 Pages

Jefferson’s thoughts were that the government should be nationally run with a strong central government. As the great president Thomas Jefferson once said,”Walking is the very best exercise. Habituate yourself to walk very far. ”-Thomas

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Anti Federlism

841 Words | 4 Pages

In the case of america goverment must not choke out seed of a new country before it begins to plant its roots. Federlism not only provides stabilty but also provides the nesecary resose for america to grow by providing a central goverment with economic organization and legislative ability. Having a central government brings the states together into one country instead of the independent semi-countrys they were before to work for the best of the nation. With the strong supporting hand of central government states are less likely to succeed from the union and more likely to provide for and support the country to the best of the abilities of the state. The central government has three different branches each with limited power unique to the branch with the system of checks and balances no branch is able to breach past their bounds and leach power from another branch the power is disrtuped so that no branch has supreme athorty not only over the others but also over the country itself.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Federalism

1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More

James Madison's Argumentative Essay

379 Words | 2 Pages

I would agree with James Madison because he was trying to help the people. He knew men where not angels at all and if they just behaved then they wouldn't need a government. See the government put down policy's when there is a problem going on. The reason why he wants a stronger government because there is more problems. If things where really that bad i would agree with that because it will never get better if they have strong policy's.

Read More

More about A Strong Central Government Pros And Cons Essay

Related Topics

Open Document