My client, Aaron Hernandez, was convicted for firstdegree murder June 26, 2013. I`m
here to prove his innocents of being accused of killing his onetime friend Odin Lloyde by
shooting him six times with two associates. For proof that was just thrown together with no
confession I`m here to speak and prove the truth.
Aaron was at the wrong time when his friend was killed. The only thing leading the police
to him or made him a suspect was a joint with his and Odin`s DNA at the crime scene. A weapon
found in a woman’s car assumed his was used against him in.
Police went back to surveillance tapes to see what they could find. They saw Aaron leave
his house with Odin but returned without him. Police never had a clear picture to show what my
client had in his
…show more content…
Aaron had two other people that went that night that could've had a gun or
it could have been a person neither Aaron nor Odin knew. The gun used in the case was found in
the back of a woman’s car that her boyfriend used. Aaron used a rental car the night Odin was
murdered.
For Odin to be a future brother in law and a friend to Aaron it shouldn't be suspisous for
them to take a ride to the park together. For Aaron to return to his own home alone shouldn't be a
strange incident itself. These are two grown men that decided to go to the park to smoke a joint
instead of in his house. Aaron and Odin could have had a simple agreement that Aaron was going
to go home and Odin could get a taxi to take him where ever else he needed to go the rest of the
Police found a piece of blue gum on the bottom of a shell casing to say it was specifically
Aarons piece of blue gum when there was no DNA evidence to prove this. To say it's specifically
his piece of gum is a tad crazy since a lot of companies make blue gum. The gum was dried by the
time police found the gun casing so there was no saliva to test DNA.
The lawyers before me made a huge mistake by trying to pin the murder on two