Adnan Syed Case

Everything seems to fall into place when the prime suspect of a murder is the ex-boyfriend, but how can he be charged when evidence proves otherwise. On January 13th, 1999 Hae Min Lee was found murdered and buried in a forest, Leakin Park. Hae could have been murdered by many people, but the jury settled on the killer being Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed. Adnan Syed should not have been found guilty under the circumstances of, the motive, unreliable cell phone tower evidence, Asia Mcclain evidence, life after the break up, and Jay’s inconsistencies; therefore he was wrongfully convicted and is innocent. The young couple seemed perfect from the beginning, and no one could ever find a flaw; the reasoning for this murder does not show anything

In Sarah Koenig’s view, “Was he so hurt that he decided to kill her?” This is talked about a lot asking how hurt Adnan would have been to kill Hae. Young couples often go through breakups, but this one lead to the death of the girlfriend. Obviously Adnan felt hurt and so was his pride, but according to Adnan and their friends they loved each other. It does not make sense that he would hurt this girl that he loved. Everyone that knew Adnan told Sarah Koenig that he was not the type of guy to hurt anyone, he was seen as the “golden child” and people could not possibly believe that he was capable any wrongdoing. Moreover, the young couple had many secrets which probably caused tension between them. A few days before Hae Min Lee’s disappearance Adnan purchased a cell phone. This cell phone would play a big part in this mystery because the evidence used from this phone is not

According to Asia Mcclain she was there that January inside the library around 2:30pm after school and she clearly recalled seeing and speaking to Adnan Syed, “Because I was never questioned. I was never informed of anything pertaining to the case.” Evidence was a big key to this investigation against Adnan Syed but when investigators had evidence from Asia they did not use it in the trial. In Asia’s view she remembered specific evidence that could have benefited Adnan and she would never testify because nobody contacted her. This evidence supports my claim because if Adnan Syed was really at the library and Asia Mcclain really saw him at the library then investigators interfered with the possibility of having Asia testify for the jury. If Asia had testified for Adnan he would have had a fair chance of being innocent as much as he did being guilty. The second piece of evidence is the affidavit that Asia Mcclain wrote for the court stating that she was there at the library and did see Adnan at the library. Even when the plain proof was right in front of investigators they failed the chance of Adnan Syed’s