photocopying text book and the necessary materials without obeying the copyright laws. In the case of Love v. Kwitny states that even coping more than half of an unpublished document also not allowed and it infringes copyright. But in the case of Wright v. Warner Books, Inc. copying an author’s unpublished letters without exceeding 1% was allowed and the sole purpose was informational.
As a coin has two sides copyright has its own advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of copyright laws overpoweringly outweigh the disadvantages. The key advantage of copyright is it stops your novel work from being misused or stolen by others and it prohibits people except the copyright owner from copying. For an example as established in the case of University of London Press Ltd. V. University Tutorial Press Ltd where the University Tutorial Press were found guilty of being infringed the University of London Press ' copyright law. Copyright permits the owner of the copyright to limit to uses of their novelty work that they find morally intolerable. In another words it safeguards the moral
…show more content…
The main advantage can automatically turn into its main disadvantage. Copyright does not permit the owner to willingly allow other people to take advantage from his own novel work or to distribute, even if people who willing to use his work without the intention of making profit. In another words this means the innovative work is distributed slowly or not at all. Authorship is not always be the copyright owner ownership. Owner must own the copyright to be able to apply the rights that it awards, and just existing as the inventor of the novel work does not continuously assurance ownership. In some instances the copyright holder is truly the person who specially produce the work, or the person who get paid royalty from the company. Copyright laws does not safeguard ideas. It is only protected the way in which the idea is