Adverse To Truth In Plato's The Apology

390 Words2 Pages

People are often averse to the truth. Plato wrote “The Apology” in order illuminate the hostility towards real truth because he believed he had an obligation to reveal how easily thought could be manipulated. Plato documents Socrates’s final address to the jury before he is due for execution. Socrates had been accused of using such embellished language throughout his explanations that he had caused a severe confusion to the people and then an eventual embarrassment; thus, allowing the people to reject what Socrates had been trying to preach. This creates a dismissal of Socrates’ ideas throughout the people and generates an even greater divide of thought. Consequently, the citizens then looked towards the higher authority in Socrates’ persecution rather than Socrates’ himself due to the pure exaggeration of the case by Meletus. This exploitation leads to a corruption within the Athenian society that Socrates is trying to prevent. He believes that there is a misunderstanding in terms of languages, and a has a strong mistrust towards the government which ultimately allows him to advocate for sameness with the people. Plato’s approach to justifying Socrates’ …show more content…

Plato illustrates this contrast in order to signify the distinct state of thought both generations were in. Therefore, this point proves the generational gap and progressive thinking within Athens. Socrates mentions numerous times that the youth of have not yet become accustomed to the standard influence of the society; thus, they do not have the same instilled distort that the older citizens may have. “But the others are more dangerous, men. They got hold of the many of you from childhood.” This becomes a crucial factor towards comprehending Plato’s intended audeince with this piece. Socrates has lost hope in persuading citizens his own age, and is now looking more towards