Controversy and disagreement are always a part of our lives. There are constantly debates over issues that bring about a right or wrong answer and important decisions have to be made frequently. Issues range from national security to what college to attend by all require a balanced viewpoint or approach. With that being said it begs to question whether or not inhumanly events, like the Holocaust or imprisonment of Japanese-Americans, would have happened if someone were there to challenge popular interest.
The actions the United States took to ensure safety after the bombing at Pearl Harbor was far to extreme. It’s saddening to think a country, as influential as the United States, would not be able to avoid such a cowardly respond, especially when it involves the well being of innocent citizens. The fear the US experienced after Pearl Harbor, particular towards Japanese citizens, is understandable, but that doesn’t excuse their crime against humanity. Many of the Japanese citizens were born in the US and their only ties with Japan were through their ancestors. Even when they arrived to “war relocation authority centers”, it wasn’t anything close to a hotel or summer camp. “These camps were more or less prisons...conditions were often very harsh”. Holocaust 2.0, minus the
…show more content…
After 9/11, a popular idea was targeting Arab-Americans to round up, surveill, or do something of that matter. The fear had returned and it seemed the US was going to resort to old habits. That’s when Korematsu stepped in and strongly suggested “not to repeat the wrongs inflicted upon Japanese-Americans”. Image if he were not there to give these words of advice and the US, repeated what they had done, and rounded up Arab citizens. Chances are the terrorists wouldn’t be too thrilled about this and they may have launched more attacks on the country. So, in a way, Korematsu saved potentially hundreds of