“Army Apparitions” by Alan Moore recounts multiple ghost experiences that will explain to the audience many stories of ghosts that have occurred on Army posts. Moore touches on each rhetorical appeal throughout his article. The author outlines ghostly accounts of military personnel in a neutral tone, which is not meant to force someone into believing in super natural occurrences. In “Ghostly Legends,” Kevin Keenen touches on various aspects of supernatural instances. From vampires, demons, and ghostly apparitions, Keenen explains stories from many different time periods. Keenen has included credible sources along with their ideas on if apparitions are real or fiction. Most of his sources believe humans want to believe in the supernatural …show more content…
Although both authors have different viewpoints on the ghosts, the articles could still apply to various audiences. In “Army Apparitions,” the topic of ghosts is brought up, but Moore keeps his neutral tone. Moore includes personal experiences which would help the reader be more likely to believe a story coming from someone who actually experienced the event. The author uses his careful word choice along with his tone to deliver this to a ghost believer or someone not so sure if they believe in ghosts. At the end of his article, he includes “Unless one believes in ghosts,” which leaves the reader questioning themselves if they believe in these ghosts stories. Moore does not try to persuade the reader to believe in ghosts, but he allows his use of personal encounters and detailed word choices to persuade the reader. On the other hand, Kevin Keenen in “Ghostly Legends” leans more toward the non-belief viewpoint on ghosts. Although, Keenen’s view on the reality of ghosts is never really clarified. Keenen states, “While most evidence can be contradicted there are still instances that can not be rationally explained. The author of “Ghostly Legends” includes many detailed opinions on multiple stories. Yale neurologist Steven Novella states, “They leap to paranormal conclusions because they want a paranormal conclusion” when talking about celebrity ghost hunters Ed and Lorraine Warren (Keenen 3). Both articles address the main idea of ghosts. Though neither agree when it comes to if they are leading the reader to believe or