ipl-logo

Alcohol After Midnight Persuasive Speech

1067 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Economic effect of prohibition

Good evening ladies and gentleman. Tonight, the negative team has not provided us with solid arguments as to why we should permit the sale of alcohol after midnight. Before I summarise my team’s case, I will begin with rebuttal. (REBUTTALS) In summary, my team has clearly highlighted how prohibiting the sale of alcohol after midnight dramatically reduces crime rates and alcohol related violence. In addition, we have thoroughly explained the social impact and the fact that the government has a responsibility to its citizens, as well as educating the younger generation to prevent a binge drinking society. Do you want your children to grow up in a dangerous and insecure neighbourhood? Do you want your children to exhibit imprudent and reckless …show more content…

This is incorrect as we are NOT closing down the stores. These licensed liquor stores can still sell alcohol until midnight and make a tidy profit. However, they should come to a standstill after midnight, as the interests of an individual and society should take priority over profit!!! Furthermore, the money spent on alcohol-related issues is significantly greater compared to the money the small businesses gain. In 2005, the total costs for alcohol-related crime in Australia was $1.7 billion. The social cost for alcohol-related violence (which excludes costs to the criminal justice system) was $187 million and the costs associated with the loss of life due to alcohol-related crimes amounted to $124 million. What is more important - profit or people? According to the National Drug Strategy Household Survey, approximately 1 in 4 Australians were a victim of alcohol-related abuse. The rates of physical and verbal mistreatment by a person affected by alcohol were more than twice the rate for other drug types. Does the health and welfare of individuals equate with economic …show more content…

This is not the case because prohibition placed a ban on the sale, production, importation and transportation of alcohol beverages. The purpose of this debate is to merely stop the sale of liquor after midnight, not banning it completely. The opposition is taking this to the extreme – we are just prohibiting it for a few hours after midnight. What harm can this bring? Just because the sales MIGHT go underground, doesn’t mean that we won’t do anything to improve our current situation. This is just a possibility and even if some people try and access alcohol on the black market, it will only be a minority so we will be able to deal with this issue. Nanny State The negative speaker stated that Australia will become a nanny state if the government continues to be overprotective or interfere with personal decisions. This is incorrect as we are doing this for the common good. In recent years, crime rates have escalated to the point where it is absolutely appalling. By mentioning this, the opposition is trying to paint the picture that the government is stripping away the rights of the individual and their entitlement to make their own

Show More
Related
769 Words | 4 Pages

Just think, no wine.no beer,no whiskey. This is prohibition. The leaders of the prohibition movement were alarmed at the drinking behavior of Americans. The law was ratified by the Federal and state government In January,1919.Prohibition in the United States was a measure designed to reduce drinking by eliminating the businesses that manufactured, distributed, and sold alcoholic beverages. The Eighteenth Amendment (prohibition law) to the United States Constitution took away license to do business from the brewers, distillers, vintners, and the wholesale and retail sellers of alcoholic beverages.

Read More
3006 Words | 13 Pages

If there wasn’t a big enough market for alcohol, there naturally wouldn’t have been as many suppliers; but, since there wasn’t a ban on consumption, it was natural to have a bigger market and more suppliers. This leads to the next indictment of

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

A world without alcohol is hard to believe. Most of today 's society wouldn’t be able to wrap their head around it. In the United States prohibition was a nationwide ban on the production, importation, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages it remained in place from 1920 to 1933. When the 18th amendment was passed in the year 1919 America was asking for chaos. With everything that affected the United States during prohibition, it is because of the increase in crime, weak enforcement, lack of respect for the law, and economic suffrage that the 18th amendment was repealed.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

In 2012, 3.3 million deaths, or over 5.9 percent of all global deaths were attributed to alcohol consumption. And as we see, since 2012, these numbers still continue to increase. According to these percentages, alcoholism has become a very major problem in our generation. Yet despite the warnings, people still continue to drink and slowly harm themselves. In our day to day lives, we see people drink on social media very often.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Prohibition: Why Did America Change Its Mind? Al Capone once said “ Prohibition has done nothing but trouble”. Ending the manufacture and transport of alcohol will only make situations worse. After the 18th Amendment was passed, the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages in the U.S. was illegal.

Read More
1839 Words | 8 Pages

According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, in 2007, the economic costs of drug abuse in the United States was $193 billion (How Illicit Drug Abuse). Of these costs, $120 billion is in lost productivity, due to labor participation costs, participation abuse treatment, incarceration, and premature death. Another $11 billion was in total healthcare costs. $61 billion was for criminal justice costs due to criminal investigation, prosecution, incarceration, and victim costs. Even though these estimates and costs may make drug trafficking appear to do more harm than good, that is not exactly the case in Mexico or many Latin American countries.

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

Australia is known as a country of freedom and fairness, however many groups such as youth, the unemployed, aged, and ethnic groups tend to become marginalised because of their minority status. Certain groups are marginalised because they are perceived as being different or undeserving of equality in society. This is called stereotyping and it leads to prejudice and discrimination. This essay explores three marginalised groups and discusses some of the reasons why they are marginalised and the effects on those within these groups. Exclusion from areas such as employment and other services and opportunities that other Australian 's take for granted, is a result of the marginality of indigenous Australian 's, woman, and those with

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Teaching children to drink safely starting while they’re 18 and living with their parents will help them develop healthy habits which will stick with them, helping them drink

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

For example, agencies have been established with the sole intent to manage drug use and distribution and technology has been exclusively developed to detect the presence of drugs. Yet, evidence has indicated that such exhaustive efforts have been relatively unsuccessful. First, it has been assumed that drugs have perpetuated violence in society and based on this rationale, it was believed that by the suppressing the pervasiveness of drugs that incidents of violence would simultaneously diminish. However, reality has failed to align with the expectations that had initially been anticipated. Research findings have suggested that the decriminalization of drugs would result in a less adversarial drug market in which conflicts have tended to arise among dealers as well as between dealers and buyers (Common Sense for Drug Policy, 2007, p. 21).

Read More
1278 Words | 6 Pages

To address this drinking age should not be lowered to 19. Many people in families think that drinking can harm their life. It’s people jobs to take care of your health and live a happy life with families and friends. Many parents take care of their children and evidence is that an average family spent $24,164 for paying for college and kids don’t know that. People of this world it is more important that you can be more efficient that you can be of not drinking.

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

The continuous use of narcotics results in addiction, and financial struggles due to the costly upkeep. “Financial problems are one of the major side effects of drug and substance abuse” (Buaggett, 2015). Addicts cannot adequately take an active role in the economic activities, as the use of drugs inhibits the abilities of the users to earn a daily living. Due to the instability of finances, this would result in selling personal belongings to continue funding the substance of choice, and depending on the addicts living situation, this could lead to losing their house or being removed from their current housing. While being under the influence, an addicts voice of reason is jeopardized, resulting in criminal activities which raise the chances of being apprehended by the law enforcers, as well as, heavy fines are imposed.

Read More
1629 Words | 7 Pages

Would the decriminalisation and / Legalisation of controlled substances improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drugs users, their families, communities and society? This essay will briefly outline the current policies on drugs in Ireland and will examine the policies and substance misuse from a European and international perspective; then it will discuss how decriminalisation of drugs and substances can improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drug users, their families, communities and society in general. Examples of controlled substances in Ireland include cocaine, heroin, methadone, cannabis (full list of controlled substances found in the schedule Misuse of Drugs Act 1977).

Read More
1693 Words | 7 Pages

A poll taken on July 2014 asked the public opinion of US adults for lowering the US legal drinking age from 21 to 18. Approximately 74% of the people opposed the idea, whereas roughly 25% of the people supported the idea ("Public Opinion" 1). The statistics indicate satisfaction among the majority of the people; however, with the current laws many issues arise that must be addressed concerning alcohol use. For starters, studies show an increase of dangerous drinking habits among young adults (Hall 2). In addition, the enforcement of the drinking laws and education on alcohol is insubstantial (Moyse, Fonder 3).

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Why drinking age should be lowered? If one is considered an adult at age eighteen in most of the country, are they not allowed to purchase and legally consume alcohol? The minimum legal drinking age needs to be lowered, and not just for that reason. The amount of teenagers with drinking problems and alcoholism is far greater than in Europe, where drinking ages are far lower. Also, studies show that the current minimum age drinking laws have been ineffective to a high degree.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Today in the United States about 4,358 people under the age of 21 years old die each year from alcohol-related car crashes, homicides, suicides, alcohol poisoning, and other injuries such as falls, burns, and even drowning. More than 190,000 people under the age of 21 visited an emergency room for alcohol related reasons in 2008 alone. Alcohol related motor vehicle crashes kill someone every 31 minutes and non-fatally injure someone every two minutes. That’s a lot of people gone because they wanted to go out and party and not think about the consequences ahead. In this essay I’m gonna give you information to why Underage Drinking is very very bad for you.

Read More

More about Alcohol After Midnight Persuasive Speech

Related Topics

Open Document