ipl-logo

Alexander The Great And Genghis Khan Comparison Essay

715 Words3 Pages

Alexander the Great, the man who spread Hellenism, and Genghis Khan, the infamous savage, are not only viewed as exceedingly different, but are in fact polar opposites. While some views of the leaders may be inaccurate and biased, such as the belief that Genghis is inhumane and savage, the differences between their lives and beliefs are still vast. Alexander was a great general, and lead many people to fight for him, however he lacked in domestic leadership and stability within his empire. Genghis on the other hand was a fierce fighter, who obliterated his enemies, but kept a stable and safe empire for his people. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan are vastly different due to how and why they lead their people, and fought against others. Alexander …show more content…

After Alexander’s death his empire was fought over and crumbled not long after his death. In stark contrast, Temujin’s empire flourished, and even reached its most powerful point after his death. In total, while Alexander lead a powerful army, his empire did not have a good foundation, unlike the Mongolian empire, which lasted from 1206 until 1920. But, not only was Temujin’s empire large, his bloodline was expanded through all the wives he took, and his tactics eventually causes “about 16 million individuals alive today” to share his Y-chromosome, meaning 16 million people are related to Genghis Khan.
Both the Mongolian Empire and Macedonian Empire are known as powerful ones, but they are also greatly different. The Mongolian Empire is known as one of the largest empires in history, second only to the British Empire. While the Macedonian empire was a smaller empire, it did give a good example of what Alexander was capable of. In general, since their empires were so vastly different, and since Temujin and Alexander had such different lives, they are more different than

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

All his hard work was destroyed only after 10 years; it is hard to call this an empire compared to the other empires around during the time, and before and after the time that lasted hundreds of years. His empire was nothing compared to these massive long lasting empires. Alexander the Great did not deserve his tittle as great because he gained power by fear, killed innocent people, and his empire did not stay together long. Alexander the Great started conquering land at the age of 20, and in the process killed thousands of innocent people, used a fear tactic to gain his power, and built a massive empire that did not last very long. Some may see him as great, but if you look a little closer at the details Alexander did more harm then good trying to unite everybody.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in history occupying 12 million square miles of land in Central Asia (Lewis, p. 1, 2002). When looking at a map of the Mongol Empire it is clear that it grew rapidly as it initially occupied its existing neighbors in 1207 and then went on to conquer the neighboring nations, taking control of the rest of central Asia by 1227 (Document C). It was created and controlled by Temüjin, who adopted the title Ghenghis Khan, meaning universal leader, from 1206 up until his death in 1227 (Lewis, p. 1, 2002). To many people Genghis Khan was considered a genius for his military strategy which partially led to his overwhelmingly successful conquest, but to others he was considered a violent, illiterate

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Genghis Khan: Lord of the Mongols Genghis Khan didn’t just lead a powerful empire that conquered cities throughout Eurasia. The Mongolian attacks and conquering of cites wasn't all negative, it introduced an era of peace and success in Eurasia (Genghis 1). Genghis Khan is a very important historical figure because he influenced religions and civilizations in his empire, impacted safe trade and travel on the silk road, and his legacy is shown in the vast amount of his descendants that can be traced through DNA. Genghis Khan wiped out numerous powerful civilizations and influenced the spread of religions. Religions spread because the Mongols did not enforce any religions (Invasions).

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

The Mongolian empire should be remembered for expansion. The Mongolian empire should be remembered for expansion because they expanded over a decade to become one of the biggest empires known to exist. The Mongols traveled across the Gobi desert with an army of 200,000

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Verdict of the Trial of Genghis Khan. After the trial had taken place, I decided that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were uncivilized. During the time of the trial I learned much more of the brutality that had taken place during his reign. The barbaric attitudes and actions of himself and his followers is what led to him being found guilty of being uncivilized.

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander 's father, King Philip was in charge of Macedonia, until he was murdered. Alexander became king as a teenager. Alexander was born on July 20, 356 BC in Pella, Macedon. He died on June 10, 323 BC in Babylon. Alexander was known for conquering a great deal of land in Asia and Europe.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Genghis Khan was able to conquer twice as much land as Alexander The Great, essentially 4,860,000 square miles, compared to Alexander’s 2,180,000. Although the argument of age and lifetime can be brought

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar were two highly important men in the history of the world. In Greek and Roman Lives, the historian Lucius Mestrius Plutarchus, better known as just Plutarch, wrote about the lives of these two great men. He wrote of how their surroundings and the people around them influenced them, and how that affected their success in their plans to reach some form of eternal glory in their desire to become greater than those who came before them. They were both extremely ambitious, quick to fight, and careless of danger on the path to glory.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

The teachings of Aristotle impacted Alexander by showing his conquered provinces a sense of tolerance due to both generosity and political wisdom rather than applying an artificial scheme to all countries; the adoption of the division of power was incorporated to prevent the possibility of rebellion (6). However, despite implementing an improved political system, Alexander established himself as a liberator by using harsh force on rebellious cities and executing an individual with a powerful influence that threatened his control (1). In order to achieve his mission of unification, Alexander felt that the best method of instilling Hellenism was by abiding with their values; he adopted the dress of a Persian king at the court ceremonies in order to strengthen his relationship and appear less foreign toward the Persians (6). Alexander the Great devised various means for unification by proposing to relocate settlers, promoting intermarriage between Persians and Macedonians, and instituting equality towards military service by training the youth located in the East as Macedonian soldiers and teaching them how to use their weapons in order to become Hellenized barbarians after 5 years (6). Alexander the Great had significantly impacted western civilization by creating various systems in order to strengthen the overall influence of the Greek

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

The Mongols Intro The Mongols have made a negative impact to all of us in one way or another. Some ways worse than others. Some of the things Genghis Khan has done may be cruel and wrong, but was what he had to do to be a great leader. The Mongolians ruled from 1260 to 1368 C.E, they were located in Mongolia, in the Northern China area.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Compare and contrast the leadership and impact of Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great. Both Khan and Alexander are great leaders. They both conquered large territories and were able to guide both the leaders and the armies underneath their command. Alexander consolidated the Greeks into one empire (although being a Macedonian he was not really seen as Greek), This stopped all intestine wars among the Hellenic cities and somehow put order in the empire, transform Greece into a tremendous war machine that allowed him to conquer their eternal enemies the Persians and most of countries under their domain, reach as far as India before his death. As he was absorbed by Persian customs, and vices, most historians say he forgot his homeland, so

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More
1780 Words | 8 Pages

Genghis killed his half-brother so that he can become the chief of the clan and alexander killed all the people who were Aires to the throne. But of course everyone has differences just like Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great. Genghis died when his was 65 years old and Alexander died when he was just 32 years old. Genghis lived twice as long as poop Alexander. They were also born far apart from each other.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great And Genghis Khan Comparison Essay

Related Topics

Open Document