ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Research Paper

649 Words3 Pages

Alexander the great was a Macedonian king who had a massive amount of land at his disposal. He is considered great because he pulled together a large group of military officials so strong it appeared as if he would never be stopped. He was; however, stopped, but he is still wrongly considered great. Alexander the great was not great because he battled mercilessly, stole the riches of the places he conquered for himself, and he had a disregard for the cultures of others. During his conflict with Thebes, Alexander fought mercilessly. He confronted the people of Thebes with a large army and all but ordered them to bow down even though it was already a known fact that not all the people living in his conquered lands supported his reign. While …show more content…

He proclaimed himself king and god, which went against the Egyptian culture. The Egyptians greeted him with mixed feelings, but not outright malice. The satrap who governed the city offered him silver, power, and even the furniture from his home to stop his advance, but Alexander said no and marched on Egypt anyway. After conquering he built his beautiful city, Alexandria, but left before he could see it. He once again left something important in the hands of his generals, who had very different plans for the city. Yes, they built libraries and culture halls, but they restricted the Egyptians from entering them. They formulated the knowledge available to the greek mind, and didn’t bother to include any Egyptian history or concepts. This effectively made sure that one class of common people in Egypt became smarter and better suited to perform certain than the other, a phenomena that the Egyptians hadn’t been exposed to as of yet. Alexander never saw Alexandria in his lifetime, and his offhandedness in this matter lead to the city not being the sparkling culture center it was supposed to be, but instead a gleaming tower of mockery for the people who were not allowed

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
1756 Words | 8 Pages

This is why Thebes first revolted but through the rebellion, he was able to prove his point, show his military brilliance, and rule with a gentle but strong hold. During the time of his death, Alexander the Great had a large influence and a massive number of cities. His empire was two million square miles and he had founded seventy cities. He accomplished this over eleven years (Doc. X). His army marched, marched, and marched on and year after year, day after day, they conquered.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander was very brilliant in the battlefield. Since conquering the Egyptian required no bloodshed, Alexander entered Egypt as a liberator. Egyptians welcome Alexander and crowned him Pharaoh. The Greek cities become the central and spread Greek language, culture, and learning. Moreover, Alexander used some strategies to rule the conquered nations, such as accommodations and assimilation.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander met his first fierce enemy at the Granicus River, he used tactics like Phalanx and siege warfare to win battles. He and his army travelled around 7000 miles from Macedonia to Egypt and to the Hynapses River in India. Alexander was a genius when it came to war tactics such as when he and his army needed to cross the Hydaspes River without losing many of his troops. So he devised a plan to go up and down the river making noise that sounded like he was preparing for an attack but wouldn’t, but when he finally did attack the enemy had left their guard down making it an easy victory. (Doc A)

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

He spread Greek culture around the world and united the great Persian empire. Alexander created many cities, including Alexandria. These were bustling cities during his rule. Alexander was very effective because he was able to blend two cultures, had a great military, and gained the trust of the people.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, due to his education from the great philosopher of Aristotle and preparation for kingship, Alexander “developed a rather high opinion of himself, including the growing belief that he himself was a god” (Background Essay). Later in life, as shown on the map entitled “Alexander’s Empire,” Alexander named eleven of his established cities “Alexandria” (Document A.) Not only does this show a lack of creativity, but also his large amount of self-obsession. During a journey across a desert, Alexander’s troops (who were already dying of thirst themselves), found a small trickle of water and carried what they could back to their leader. However, Alexander dumped the helmet of water onto the ground, completely wasting the good deed his soldiers had performed for him.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

He was born in 356 BCE, more than 300 years before Jesus of Nazareth. First Alexander should not be considered great because he killed many innocent people and he had a huge ego and he conquered everything in his way. Document A is an example of this because it talks about his route and how many cities he went through and destroyed everything and everyone in his path. This makes Alexander not great because those people didn't harm or hurt him in any way. He felt like they were in his way and anything in his way is to be destroyed.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

I definitely think Alexander the Great was great. Although ruthless and short-tempered, he conquered the entirety of Southwest Asia, and I think it’s hard to argue him being a poor leader from that statement alone. Nonetheless he had many other accomplishments, he unified Greece, got revenge on Persia for burning the Acropolis in Athens, among other things. He was learning to be a leader from a young age, and, in fact, was tutored by Aristotle himself!. In addition, when thrusted into power after his father’s death, he systematically rid himself of domestic rivals to the throne, not to mention the speed and efficiency in which he did it.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

The transformation of the Iatros began with Alexander the Great whose conquest through Egypt, in 322-321 BC, led to the foundation of Alexandria. As he took control of Egypt Alexander the Great continued his conquest East and left one of his Generals in charge, Ptolemy I. Eventually, Alexander the Great died which lead to a power vacuum amongst his generals, who went to war with one another. In light of these events, Ptolemy I declared himself the ruler of Egypt and sought to make Alexandria the economic and cultural capital of the Greek world. Ptolemy I, had a tremendous advantage with the wealth and papyrus of Egypt and was able to basically build Alexandria from the ground up.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document