World War I ended in 1918 with the victorious Allied powers, and the peace-promising Treaty of Versailles. However, this treaty 's peace did not last long as its unrealistic demands caused strong resentment within the Central powers against the Allied powers. Territorial losses, reparation payments, and inflation all left Europe in economic ruins. The damage and destruction that resulted from World War I paved a clear path that allowed for World War II to occur. It began in 1933 when Adolf Hitler gained power and, with the help of the Nazi Party, turned Germany in a totalitarian dictatorship.
Teacher’s Bibliography (a) Non-fiction Emert, P. R. (1996). World War II: On the Homefront. Carlisle, MA: Discovery Enterprises. World War II: On the Homefront recounts how Americans worked together on the home front to survive World War II. Americans had to ration food, rubber, and metal to help America win the war.
The book All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque gives us a good understanding of what war was like for the people fighting on the front. When reading this book people can get a front hand experience of what it is like being in battle. Remarque wrote this book so well that often times you picture yourself actually with Paul and all his friends. The one thing you specifically get to see is how humanity affects warfare. Humanity affects our decisions in warfare because humans are selfish, have fear, and seek revenge.
Hitler was the main aggressor during 1939 who everyone appeased to, who is infamously known for his rise to power, his persecution of Jews, and his attacks on the world to dominate, that killed so many. Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, believed in the policy of appeasement and appeased Hitler at the Munich Conference which eventually lead to the start of World War II. The Western Powers responded to aggression with appeasement, and in 1939 the world was plunged into World War II, proving to the world that collective security is a better response to aggression. Hitler’s aggression was the main reason why Allied powers felt the need to appease. In 1930, after the Reichstag fire, Adolf Hitler rose to power because he was appointed
Hanoi, the capital city of Vietnam, is one of the most historic places in the world. Hanoi has been through several battles and therefore, Vietnamese are those who understand war the best. But have you ever wondered what war is like from another country's perspective, such as Germany? Germany, evidently, is a region full of history. However, we know little about Germans.
All Quiet on the Western Front is a historical fiction novel by Erich Maria Remarque. It was first published in 1929 and is based on Remarque’s experiences as a soldier in World War I. Throughout the novel, Remarque uses imagery and his characters to critique how war is often romanticized and viewed as patriotic and an honor, because he views war as inglorious and destructive. Remarque’s thoughts and critiques of war can still be applied today because war is still as glamorized and harmful as it was in World War I. Remarque critiques the romantic rhetoric of war and honor, while showing how he feels that war is inglorious by mentioning the horrors of the war, like death, and by demonstrating how the ordinary person cannot understand war.
Works Cited: The introduction to the edition I 'm listening to is by General John W. Vessey Jr., and therein he describes it as an anti-war novel, comparing it to The Red Badge of Courageand All Quiet on the Western Front. I can see a bit of why that might be. Damon is a very good officer, who cares about his men but is also good at fighting and deeply committed to seeing his objectives through. He 's horrified by the things that he sees while at the same time seeing them as necessary. In a long conversation after the Armistice with his mentor/commanding officer (one of the weak points of the novel one has to ignore is that there 's a tendency of the author to pontificate a bit through his characters)
Erich Maria Remarque was a man who had lived through the terrors of war, serving since he was eighteen. His first-hand experience shines through the text in his famous war novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, which tells the life of young Paul Bäumer as he serves during World War 1. The book was, and still is, praised to be universal. The blatant show of brutality, and the characters’ questioning of politics and their own self often reaches into the hearts of the readers, regardless of who or where they are. Brutality and images of war are abundant in this book, giving the story a feeling of reality.
All Quiet on the Western Front Analysis Society’s viewpoint on war has changed greatly throughout the last few centuries. All Quiet on the Western Front sparked massive controversy after its release to such an extent that Germany banned the book. Readers from all over the globe gained insight into Erich Remarque’s point of view on warfare. His novel contains the harsh realities soldiers have to face on the battlefield.
The man is an unknown character who is trying to survive by all means possible. The extract contains a bit of humour in the beginning as Raina makes fun of him by calling him a chocolate soldier. She's a little sarcastic but also means sympathy when she says, '' Oh, you are a very poor soldier; a chocolate cream soldier". When told to escape by climbing down the pipe, he hesitates as he's frightened of the fact that he might fall.
The Germans stood firm on their trenches and it was not easy to dislodge them. The wounded soldiers were carried by the girls and even the drivers and locals gave a hand, but it soon became dark. The instructions were given to carry all the wounded and return back to their trenches. But the wounded were very high in number. Those who could not make it to the trench were killed by the Germans and the screaming was heard all throughout that night.
Throughout the history, there have been heated discussions on what constitutes a good life. Philosophers have given different annotations on the meaning of good life based on their beliefs, perspectives or even scientific-based evidences. Some view a good life as an accumulation of material goods that brings “large amount” of pleasure to oneself. On the other hand, Mencius and Aristotle advocate good life as possessing of pleasure that incorporates ethical values and they believe that by doing so one will experience enduring happiness. There is no ultimate right or wrong for these interpretations since this is not a factual question.
It might seem as an illusion of someone who wanted a perfect life but it is of course completely subjective. The meaning of living well is varies from person to person. I mean, we all want love, joy, abundance and good health. To be honest, I want abundance in all aspect of my life. I want abundant love, joy, health and many more.
John Stuart Mill writes, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” in his book Utilitarianism. The meaning of this quote varies based on what makes an individual satisfied or dissatisfied. The “good life” is the life a person would like to live as well as what makes them better off. Would having a “good life” mean that a person is content, or does virtuosity make one happy?
Have you ever dreamed to live well? Or Did you know someone who has lived a good life? If so, how can you define a good life? According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, the good life can be defined as “a life marked by a high standard of living. In my opinion, the good life can be defined as a way that someone plans to live virtuously by having a great education, enough money, and helping others.
