A ramification of theories was suggested about the phrase “accountability”. It is not argued that accountability is crucial to everybody but there is absolutely no determination on the way the accountability is discussed and visible to be furnished (Sinclair 1995). Messner (2009) even stated it is sensible to demand more accountability. However, accountability has now lost its own identity and requires an extensive meaning (Mulgan, 2000) Sinclair (1995) expressed her opinions on accountability as a “cherished concept, sought after but elusive”. She believes that accountability is independently created and gets better with surroundings. She had completed interviews with 15 Chief Executives Officers (CEOs) of Australian public sectors organisations …show more content…
CEOs description of being accountable are divided into two discourses which are structural and personal discourse. These discourses were distinguished by distinct patterns of associations and words, various ways and emphases of relating understanding and experience . Accountability in the structural discourse is spoken of as the technical property of a role or contract, structure or system. In contrast, the personal discourse is confidential and anecdotal. In this discourse, accountability is ambiguous, with the possibility to be feared or uplifting. Accountability here is about exposure and vulnerability and it is extremely near to the CEO’s sense of who she or he is. The personal discourse functions to admit the risks and failures, exposure and invasiveness with which accountability is experienced. (tukar …show more content…
Accountability is an act of providing an account to somebody else to realise the task. Bovens (2010) unveiled the forum and actor concept which will be associated with principle agent concept. There are three stages for this concept. First, the actors should inform to the forum the purposes of the activities, for instance, the process. Next, the forum is going to give chance to thoughts of the activities to find the importance of doing so. Finally, the forum is going to give full duty on the actor to perform its conduct (Boven, 2010). In other words, accountability is most effective with two-way communication not only one party retain the duty to determine the functionality of the opposite party. Nevertheless, the final action is usually argued that it should not be incorporated in the meaning of accountability since it is not fair to the actor to confront all of the effects as the forum has already been crystal clear about the problems. This stage ensures the job done is efficient and