ipl-logo

Ana V. Brad And Connie: An Action In Assault Annie

1504 Words7 Pages

Ana v Brad and Connie : Assault Ana has an action in assault against Brad and Connie which directly produced apprehension in Brad and Connie. To satisfy the elements of assault Ana created a direct threat and threat can be identified from her violent act. Furthermore, that could be identified that plaintiff’s apprehension must be reasonable and threatened interference is imminent. The act was intended and Ana would have foreseen it as she was concerned about safety warnings. Relatively, the case of Brady v Schatzel [1911] St R Qd 206 shows that there is no intention to committed battery is not relevant. Further to the case of Stephens v Myers (1830) 172 ER 735 A completed battery is also not necessary. Similarly Pursell v Horn (1838)112 …show more content…

The action of Graeme and Hetty directly results in an apprehension of imminent or immediate danger in the Desi’s mind. He had no choice rather than calmly walked between Graeme and Hetty .Similar to Myer Stores Ltd v Soo [1991] 2 VR 597, this may result in deprivation of Desi's freedom of movement. Aggravated damages would be awarded as act would satisfied the false imprisonment and Desi may suffered with ill feelings. Moreover, Graeme grabbed Desi by the arm and pulled him close, and said in a threatening voice ‘you are coming with us now either on your feet or unconscious and over my shoulder.’ Which caused an action in battery against Desi. The physical force was formed by Graeme and willed muscular movement involved and accompanied by fault. With support of Brian Rixon v Star City Pty Ltd [2001] 53 NSWLR 98 as hostile attitude and requisite intention may cause battery. Furthermore, cole v turner (1705) 6 mod 149 ;87 ER 907 confirmed that touching “in anger” must be battery and touching must have “hostile” to satisfy the claim. Wilson v Pringle 1987 1 QB 237,253. Therefore, Graeme may convicted of battery and liable for exemplary …show more content…

This may directly produce apprehension in Ana’s mind and intended could be foreseen it. Though there is no intention to commit the battery as stated in Brady v Schatzel [1911] St R Qd 206. Fee may liable for assault. As per Stephens v Myers (1830) 172 ER 735 completed battery is not necessary and Words alone can constitute assault comparatively Read v Coker (1853) 138 ER 1437 However, as per Read v Coker 1853 13 cb 850;138 ER 1437 word spoken between parties may constitue assault if threatening action involved. Therefore, Fee’s words would not have demonstrated any threating action and Ana has no reasonable apprehension as per MacPherson v Beath (1975) 12 SASR 174 at 177 as no immediate violence involved. Similarly, in Police v Graves [1964] NZLR 295 ‘conditional threat of force’ which the Fee eligible to use is not assault as he has seen Ana was convicted the violence action. Therefore, Fee is not liable for assault and no damages would be

Show More
Related
2497 Words | 10 Pages

1LT Handelman does not recall any events past 0000 the morning of 13 MAR 16, however, sufficient evidence exists to indicate around 0119 hours he was acting in a drunk and disorderly manner in the street and kicked the window of a passing car. A KNP Officer responding to the incident attempted to calm him at which time 1LT Handelman struck him in the chin with his fist and knocked him to the ground attempting to choke him with both hands (Exhibit 02). 1LT Handelman sustained a significant number of contusions, abrasions, and a chipped tooth in the ensuring altercation however; the force applied by the KNP does not appear to be excessive given the

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

DISCUSSION I. Under the Ohio Duty of Care Owed to Trespasser Statute, even though Oleg Burov likely knew that children might trespass on his property, he will likely not be liable for a slip and fall injury Frank Gaad sustained outside a hot tub on Burov’s property. Using the doctrine of attractive nuisance the Ohio Duty of Care Owed to Trespasser Statute establishes the liability of real property owners for injuries sustained by minor trespassers. Mayle v. McDonald Steel Corp., No. 2010-T-0090, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 4319, at *18 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 7, 2011).

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

On the indicated date and time I Deputy Garcia #618055 was assigned to staff station 620 at North County Correctional Facility (NCCF) when I heard a loud thud which is consistent with that of fighting. I saw Inmate Lopes, Juan #3456712 (later identified as suspect/victim 1 (S/V)) and Inmate Henry, Chuck #2345678 (late identified as suspect/victim 2 (S/V)) on the ground by the day room punching each other on their face and torso. I put a radio broadcast of a minor 415 inmates in dorm 623 with my county issued radio (minor 415 is a common radio code in our facility which indicates a fight is in progress or just occurred). I also requested additional personnel, Sergeant and Senior to my location. I ordered S/V1 Lopes and S/V2 Henry to stop fighting and they complied.

Read More
1831 Words | 8 Pages

The Owen Labrie Case Police When the young girl was assaulted on May 30, 2014, she did not come forward right away. She waited a while. This young woman then called her mother sobbing, so the mother went to the school immediately and figured the situation out. Not only were the police investigating the possible assault, but they were also looking at the ritual that these boys had planned for so many years (Shworm, 2015). The senior boys at St. Paul High School would try to have sex with younger girls, particularly freshmen, before they graduated.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

DISCUSSION The facts are as follows with regards to our client Sam Mara’s alleged conspiracy case. Mr. Mara has hired us to find out the strength of the charge against him regarding the events of July 16, 2017. Mara was arrested for allegedly engaging in organized criminal activity by allegedly conspiring to commit a felony robbery of a store in the Houston Galleria. The robbery was never completed.

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Stella Zhao Mr. Struk CLU3M1 05 December 2017 Verdict Rationale In the case R. v. O’Brien, the defendant, O’Brien, had been charged of two assaults. Pat O’Brien, was charged that he, on the 12th day of June, 2009 in the City of Yourtown in the Region of Yourtown, committed an assault upon Toby Fantasia which caused bodily harm to her, contrary to Section 267 of the Criminal Code; And further charged that he, on the 12th day of June, 2009 in the City of Yourtown in the Region of Yourtown, assaulted Toby Fantasia, a peace officer engaged in the execution of her duty, contrary to Section 270 of the Criminal Code. After hearing the trial, I organized 11 points of evidences presented in court of why O’Brien should be acquitted. O’Brien did not commit any crime.

Read More
1452 Words | 6 Pages

Dave had violated the law under Section 352 of the Penal Code when he assaults May by banging on the door and shouting at the top of his voice threatening May to watch out once he got hold of May. When the lock gave way, May was afraid that Dave could harm her as Dave is an Australian six foot tall guy, therefore she jumped out of the window and broke her ankle. Under the section 352 of the penal code, it also says that unless the defendant actions are caused by grave and sudden provocation, he shall be punished with a fine or a jail term or both. In Dave’s case, there is no grave and sudden provocation in my opinion as he has the time to follow May upstairs. Similar to R v Roberts (1971), the court held that the defendant’s actions were foreseeable

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

I think it would be difficult for the prosecution to form an argument off of my points. The prosecution admitted that they don’t argue that Ms. Stephens is a victim of abuse, but rather is not suffering from battered woman syndrome. Once I use all of my witnesses and explain how Ms. Stephens is a clear case of battered woman syndrome, I think they will have a difficult time arguing that considering she clearly has every sign and symptom. The only argument I think they can use would be that because Mr. Stephens went to take a nap, Ms. Stephens could have just called the police and not shot him herself. I think members of the jury may also agree with this purely on the basis that those who aren’t victims of abuse can easily have the mindset that

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

INTRODUCTION Defendant Ms. Kalani Herrera ("Ms. Herrera") respectfully request the court grants Ms. Herrera 's motion for summary judgment and dismiss the plaintiffs, Mr. And Mrs. Malone 's ("Malones") personal injury claim. The Malones have a brought a personal injury lawsuit against Ms. Herrera under the attractive nuisance doctrine on behalf of themselves and their daughter Maria Malone ("Maria"), a minor who was injured on an a peace of land art while trespassing on Ms. Herrera 's property. However, the plaintiffs have failed to establish elements that are pertinent to the claim. Landowners typically owe no duty to trespassers however, the doctrine of attractive nuisance is an exception to

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

Next, Sianturi saw a white woman strike the older man with something in her hand. By kicking the older man already on the sidewalk, Redrum committed aggravated battery. However, since according to Skittles’ testimony, Redrum helped Breeze take of her shoe, he can be charged with an aggravated assault charge. At the minimum, Clark faces simple battery since he intentionally caused harm to Clark. However, the charge may be raised to aggravated assault if intent to murder is supported by further evidence.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

Keeping the facts of the case in mind the accused was aware of her husband’s tendencies towards acting angrily and impulsively, Creakle’s rage at Esther’s departure was further fueled by their prior argument. After she told him to “go away” the reasonable person would believe that if she could no longer see him he had taken heed to her advice. Knowing the nature of her husband Esther was cautious and double checked to confirm he had left, due to her restricted visibility she was unable to see him. In this situation, her actions did not fall below the expected standard of care as she was cautious towards the outcome and took steps to ensure Creakle’s safety. As was ruled in Beatty (2008) if a reasonable person holding the knowledge of the accused, could not have foreseen the consequences of their actions they are not morally blameworthy, and therefore lack the mens rea necessary for the criminal offence (Verdun-Jones, 2015, p.120)

Read More
1745 Words | 7 Pages

Question 1: X is guilty of burglary in Virginia according to the Virginia burglary statute because he committed the crime with intent when he entered the building in the first place and by also using force by breaking in the window, both are felonies that constitute a guilty verdict, according to page 393. X is also guilty of common law larceny according to the law because his intent is to steal the computer with no intent on returning it, he is taking personal property of another person. According to common law, he would be guilty because he is showing intent to take an item without the knowledge of the other person, showing intent to steal, leading to the guilty conviction according to the common law larceny. According to the Rockmore case,

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

Closing Statement Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Lennie Smalls has been charged with the crime of voluntary manslaughter. This charge states that the defendant intended to cause injury but not bodily harm; it also states that the defendant had no prior intent to kill and was given a reason-either through anger or harassment-by the victim This charge does not apply to Lennie. Lennie Smalls is nothing more than a gentle giant. He also tends to be unaware of the consequences of his actions until they come about. Lennie while inhumanly strong, does not know how to control his strength.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

Research - Legal Content (Cyrus S. Tabibnia) California Kidnapping Laws Penal Code Section 207-210 – California Kidnapping See, California Penal Code Sections 207 – 210 to learn about the laws of California Kidnapping. The California PC Sections 207, 208, 209, and 210 describe ‘kidnapping’ as the act of forcibly taking another individual against his/her will. Under the PC section 207, ‘abducting’ is the act of forcibly holding, taking or confining a person against his or her self-will. By instilling the fear and using the force, the Defendant moves the victim from one place to another.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

The question above calls for the detailed analysis of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, hereby as, CDA 1971, and how it is to be applied at situation which involve property damage and punishments for the required act. Further discussion would also include the situation where a threat is used to destroy property damage according to the CDA 1971. In order to apply the CDA 1971, we need to know, what criminal damage actually means. Criminal damage is any damage which has been caused by an individual to some form of property.

Read More

More about Ana V. Brad And Connie: An Action In Assault Annie

Related Topics

Open Document