ipl-logo

Analysis: A Pirate But Not A Thief

994 Words4 Pages

In the argument “A Pirate but Not a Thief: What Does Stealing Mean in a Digital Environment” By Alex Mullen, the author did a great job stating his side on whether or not downloading a movie from an internet torrent site is stealing or not. The Author stated his reasoning using definitions and examples to convince his audience. He used his own experiences to show how downloading a movie did not affect himself or the creator or owner of that movie. However, the author did not convince me that using a torrent site is perfectly ok and believe the author, although very convincing in his words, was not successful in convincing me that it is ok to take other peoples work freely from sites on the internet, therefore, making him a pirate and a thief. …show more content…

The U.S. Congress was first introduced to the NET Act in 1990 to deter people from downloading files by threatening large fines. With the internet and electronic technology growing quickly the NET Act passed into law by 1997. The NET Act being passed made it a federal crime to distribute files. If more than ten copies of material that is being copyrighted is being distributed within 180 days, the person making the copies can be punished with a fine or time in jail. So legally using a torrent site to receive free movie files is against the law and consider to be stealing. Although the author could be protected under fair use because he was using the copy for school and it did not substantially affect the value of the work. However, if one person downloads the movie, then we know there are probably many more doing the same therefore the downloading becomes bigger than just borrowing. In the argument, the author states that he does not see what he was doing as stealing, although he states his other options for renting the movie through a reliable and authorized site. He also claims to have deleted the movie shortly after watching and doing his assignment on the movie downloaded. Deleting the file did not make the illegal downloading of the file ok. It is still a crime to use torrent sites to download movies and considered to be an act of piracy. The author also stated that when using …show more content…

The author was almost convincing enough to be successful in his argument, but looking at the law and what it means to pirate files from the internet convinced me that he was wrong. Although it was not a common thing for the author to do he had other options for getting the film he needed and could have taken a different path to attain the film. There was no mention of copyright laws in the argument which could have been useful and assisted in the argument 's success. The author was unable to convince me that piracy is not stealing due to the definitions of the two being similar and due to the laws against piracy and copyright

Show More
Related
1356 Words | 6 Pages

TELE 5330 – DATA NETWORKING ASSIGNMENT #2 Name: Prashanth Reddy Edunuri Grade (1) Most applications that use peer-to-peer communication also employs client server communication for some portion of functionality as decentralized peer-to-peer networks have numerous compensations over old-fashioned client-server networks. This system endorsed files to be questioned and shared between users, devoid of a central directory, and as a result shielded the network from lawful issues of individual users. By decentralizing resources, P2P networks have been able to virtually exclude expenses allied with a centralized infrastructure.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

Lawrence Lessig’s research on piracy and copyright laws suggest the issue began long before Napster’s free website of burning music for personal use. In fact, stolen content was first documented one hundred years ago when Thomas Edison’s inventions were stolen before copyright laws were in place. Moreover, Lessig compares piracy and loopholes throughout history. Thomas Edison’s phonographs and Henri Fourneaux’s player pianos (used to record music) forced copyright laws just as cable companies’ piracy techniques forced copyright laws.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

Now it 's time for Professor Faden to tell his side of the case he thinks his video is fair use over copyright and doesn 't think he should get sued over this. Faden’s movie he has made is fair use in many way. He never took the concept of the creator 's work. And is also non-infringing because his video is used for education. It’s used in education by teaching people about fair use, what can and cannot be fair use.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

Even though the movie is creative and all, he still used the clips from Disney’s movies without asking permission. It is used for a good use, like that sure could teach somebody about fair use and copyright. I think that he didn’t break copyright law. Disney’s movies go under fair use which Faden decided to use. He didn’t break the copyright law of plagiarism because he didn’t use 10% of disney 's movie.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

In Alex Mullen's essay, "A Pirate But Not a Thief: What Does “Stealing” Mean in a Digital Environment?” the author explains the difference between stealing online and borrowing. Mullen explains the definition of stealing: “is the unlawful taking of another’s property or profits without permission” (245). He argues that if an individual downloads movies or music online, it doesn't mean its stealing because you're not taking profit from the original owner, it’s just borrowing. He gives an example that justifies piracy by explaining that it is like renting from a library or video store.

Read More
87 Words | 1 Pages

Student sues college for accusations of plagiarism James Lowell is suing Green Hills College for 600,000 dollars after its Judicial Board has decided to suspend him for plagiarism. “We don’t feel that he was properly informed of the Judicial Board’s definition of plagiarism before he was accused of doing something wrong,” Attorney Janet Fillmore, who represents Lowell said. However, Dean Houston from the college said, “The college’s Judicial Board made the decision after fully considering all aspects of the case. It was also a decision without bias.”

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Occupations labeled as a profession tend to be specialized and require a depth of knowledge and understanding of the field. Criminals can also form a profession in a specific field such as murder, thievery, or bank robbery. As a professional thief, certain jobs can be specialized such as a professional pick pocket or conman. One such job is a professional boxman. A boxman is a thieve that specializes in cracking open safes through either torching, peeling, blowing, or punching (Chambliss & King, 2004, p. 14) the safe.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Starting with the foundation of Hollywood, he describes how film makers moved to California to escape the reach of copyright laws that protected the inventions of Thomas Edison that made film production possible. In this case, the binary is between Edison, backed by federal law, and filmmakers such as Fox and Paramount, who pirated his inventions in order to pioneer the film industry. Lessig draws a pattern between these past discrepancies and P2P sharing, claiming that both occur in an attempt to “escape an overly controlling industry.” In the case of P2P sharing, the binary is between the music industry and the general public. By using binaries, Lessig strengthens his argument by making it appear simpler than it truly is.

Read More
223 Words | 1 Pages

In the article, “What parents need to know about plagiarism,” Sandra Miller gives her opinion to The Washington Post about why parents need to know about plagiarism, in order to guide them while writing papers. Miller wrote about how her son was skimming websites and taking information without acknowledging/ giving credit to the source. By not giving credit to the sources, this would classify as taking one’s work and using it as your own. That would be considered plagiarizing because you’re stealing someone’s work. If the son was to give credit to the source, that would be giving documentation; therefore, meaning he didn’t plagiarize.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

In Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty, Rebecca Howard used words like “robbed” and “kidnapped” to describe plagiarism. However, most emphasis had been put on the fact that originality is key to recognition and true authorship where she says “writers who want recognition must assert priority; to assert priority is to assert originality; and to assert originality engenders a fear of being robbed” (Howard 791). In UNCW’s policy, plagiarism is defined as “the copying of language, phrasing, structure, or specific ideas of another and presenting any of these as one’s own work, including information found on the Internet” (“Section I” 12). This definition is very different from Rebecca’s policy because it has included sources from the internet. Rebecca shows us that this issue of plagiarism only started recently because of technological advancements which brought about the big debate about authorship (Howard).

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

In the midst of it all, buccaneers and privateers are generally known as what they are, pirates. But, this hackneyed term is slightly ambiguous. What most people don’t know is that these three hundred year old beings appeared in different situations throughout the Golden Age of Piracy. Many of the pirates from this period lived in separate parts of the world, executing different assignments for different reasons. Although buccaneers and privateers were, in essence, pirates, they were inequivalent in terms of background, purpose, and operation.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

The majority of students know what the consequences are for stealing someone’s work, and they know that these consequences can be pretty severe. Although I do agree with Rebecca’s other points, this one does not stand out to

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

After taking (In) English 102 I learned the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarism. After reading an article written by Brian Martin I wrote a research journal that (outlined) how his article helped me understand this distinction. In my article I wrote “After reading the article written by Brian Martin I learned how it is important to know the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarizing, while many people lack the to understand the difference between paraphrasing and plagiarizing Brian martin very easily draws a line and helps his readers to understand that why it is important for writers to know the difference and how they can avoid making such mistake, his discussion about how plagiarism should not be just limited on school levels

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

If someone stole a pencil from a store, no one would think twice about it, but if someone’s life was stolen, then it would engross people’s attention. In The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, a boy named Amir discovers the aspects of life as he grows up with his father, Baba. During a discussion between the two, Baba tells Amir that the worst sin in the world is theft and that all other crimes are variations of theft. In “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, he argues that being indifferent is the worst sin that exists because he thinks that to be abandoned is worse than being punished. Although indifference makes people feel like they do not exist, theft is the greater sin because it is connected throughout all ways of life, because some crimes like killing and lying would be considered as theft.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

In a complaint by Dirmeyer, a search warrant was issued by the Magistrate of Northern District of California and location of AACBBS was searched and defendants computer system was seized on December 10, 1994. Charges on 12 counts were framed by the Federal Grand Jury against the defendants (Robert Thomas and his wife Carleen) for violating US law of obscenity and knowingly carrying on inter-state trade of offences and the Court ordered the forfeiture. They were found guility of the offences and the Court ordered the forfeiture of defendant’s computer system and sentenced Robert Thoamas to 37 months imprisonment and his wife Carleen to 30 months imprisonment. The defendants appealed against their conviction on the ground that the Tennessee Court has no Jurisdiction to try their case because the alleged offence related to intangible object like computer GIF files committed in California, to which the provisions of Section 1465 of 18 USC did not apply, and that the section did not expressly prohibit or regulate the computer transactions involved in the instant

Read More

More about Analysis: A Pirate But Not A Thief

Related Topics

Open Document