ipl-logo

Analysis Of An American Conspiracy By Alan C. Moore

1856 Words8 Pages

Introduction
To encourage disciplined governance, the Founding Fathers designed the United States political system to put its various federal institutions in conflict. As such, these conflicts of US government frame and impact the political world of An American Conspiracy by Alan C. Moore. This paper proposes that this novel portrays an accurate representation of the conflictual relationship between the President and Congress, but it fails to realistically reflect Congress’s internal disagreements originating from polarization. After giving a brief summary of the novel’s plot, this essay explores several trends in American politics relevant to An American Conspiracy: the limited power of the President over Congress, the political leverage of …show more content…

Regarding the former, a popular misconception is that the president “can achieve any political or policy objective if only he tries hard enough or uses the right tactics,” a belief known as the Green Lantern Theory of politics. By the Founding Fathers’ design, the “[p]resident has little formal power to make Congress do anything”—a “combination of public speeches and private wheedling” is not enough to force Congressional action. This is further complicated by elections’ incentives structures. “When the president takes a position on an issue[,] the opposing party becomes far more likely to take the opposite position” because “elections are zero-sum affairs.” Cooperating with the President’s platform translates into an appearance that the president is successful. For the other party, this undermines the opposing party’s reason for election. The United States’s polarized political environment also intensifies this phenomenon because most members of Congress represent safe districts. Cooperating with a President of the opposing party may motivate a more partisan primary challenger to run against them. Although An American Conspiracy’s Congress may be “close to the middle ideologically,” this does not negate legislators’ interest in their electoral viability for upcoming elections. Even if they do not feel strongly about the President’s proposal based on ideology, the opposing party traditionally has an incentive to see the President fail in the interest of their personal and their party’s electoral viability. Even amongst the President’s own party, Congressmembers have a reason to obstruct the plan because raising gas prices may anger their constituents or motivate a primary challenger to run against them. Put simply, this novel properly recognizes the agency of Congress and its members in relation to

Show More
Related
475 Words | 2 Pages

From the first president George Washington to Barak Obama the 44th president, all had to use their popularity and prestige to have nation’s accompaniment. Yet, they need to gain accompany of the congress by persuading not only house members, also any individuals whom action or view can have impact on executive power to succeed in any policy that they

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

“Party Games: The Art of Stealing Elections in the Late-Nineteenth-Century United States,” written by Mark Wahlgren Summers, discusses the elements of trickery and manipulation utilized by Democrats, Republican, and Populists during the Gilded Age in efforts to get their party’s candidate(s) into office. As the text points out, “the broad range of party tricks obscured the people’s will, occasionally thwarted it, and cast a moral cloud over the winner’s title” (425). All of these political schemes that the parties in the Gilded Age were privy to, basically made a mockery of the democracy in the United States. Instead of being represented by the people, America was represented by a bunch of scoundrels, also known as politicians.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

In his chapter on Party Polarisation, Brian Schaffner draws upon a range of research in order to examine the extent to which external and internal factors have caused the polarisation of Congress as identified by research drawing upon Poole and Rosenthal’s NOMINATE scoring. Such research found that legislative voting in both the House and the Senate has become increasingly split along party lines over the last four decades. Several explanations have been put forward to suggest why this may be the case, although, for the most part, each of these explanations is consistent one of two broader schools of thought on the issue. The first of these is the belief that it is external (outside of the legislature) factors that have caused Congress to become so polarised.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

This further illustrates the desperation and pettiness in the highest office of the US. Polls show that trust in the executive branch of government fell dramatically after the hearings. We will elaborate on this

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Congressional Caucus Chaos In “With Boehner’s Departure, Congressional Dysfunction Will Only Grow,” Norman J. Ornstein argues that a radical group in the Republican Party has kept progress from being made and John Boehner resigning from his Speaker of the House position will not make things on Capitol Hill any more productive. Ornstein says that, “The realists, like Boehner, understand that divided government requires compromise,” but unfortunately, extremists are unwilling and outright opposed to doing just that. Ornstein believes a successful upcoming congressional session does not have a chance at occurring and finds Radical Republicans to blame because they have made stopping President Obama’s plans a priority. I agree that one group of Republicans are keeping Congress from not only passing meaningful legislation on the controversial topics, but keeping them from passing common sense laws; however, I disagree with the author in regards to Congress staying on this uncivil, unproductive path.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

The idea of gridlocking indicates that a vote in Congress is equally divided between both legislative bodies and contributes to the inability of elected representatives to pass laws on state or federal legislature. Because the United States government is run primarily by the Republicans and the Democrats, two completely different political ideology affiliates, the occurrences of gridlocking in legislature has continued to rise every year. In response to research conducted by the University of Georgia, political scientist, Keith Poole determines the grim manner in which this current system will play out for the future of U.S.legislative policy, “With almost no true moderates left in the House of Representatives, and just a handful remaining in the Senate, bipartisan agreements to fix the budgetary problems of the country are now almost impossible to reach.” (Poole

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Difficulties Between President George W. Bush and The Congress A serious component of democracy, based on the United States Constitution, is the relationship and interaction between two significant institutions. The major institutions of which being discussed are the Presidency and the Congress. This relationship could be difficult at times and possibly result in a “divided” or “unified” government when addressing an important crisis. George Bush, the forty-third president, encountered difficulties with Congress, despite his initial promise to work with Congress.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States government, public opinion is crucial due to majoritarian rule and the notion of “consent of the governed”. A president’s power resides in the people; therefore, the president may enjoy persuasive power if deemed legitimate. The general trend for presidents is to begin their terms with high levels of support. However, this trend is short lived as the public approval usually declines.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Conspiracy theories have had an extensive history in all parts of the world. However, the United States in particular has had conspiracy theories intertwined with their politics and popular culture to a greater extent than most countries. Peter Knight addresses this in his book, Conspiracy Culture: From Kennedy to The X-Files. Within his piece, Knight examines conspiracy culture and how it became a regular feature of everyday political and cultural life after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November, 1963.

Read More
1626 Words | 7 Pages

Elected officials must balance the wishes of the overall electorate, specific constituencies within the Congress, and their own ideology. The relative importance of those competing factors remains an open question (Levitt, 1996). According to Fenno legislators make their decisions based off of three primary goals: reelection, good public policy, and influence (Smith, et al., 2013). Mayhew argues that Fenno's first goal, reelection, is in fact the only goal. His reasoning is that congressional members are constantly scared or worried with the thought of losing the next election round.

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Take the idea of DHS funding. This important issue needed to go through the Senate, and the Democrats used a filibuster, so that the motion would not pass. If the Democrats did not use this filibuster, the Republicans would pass the bill easily, while immediately after, President Obama would veto it. The reason the Democrats used a filibuster, was to identify with their party. These senators had to identify with their president or otherwise be ridiculed and shunned by their party.

Read More
1586 Words | 7 Pages

In recent years, the U.S. Senate has been embroiled in a countless number of filibusters which have a long history in the U.S. Congress. To supporters of the filibuster, such political procedures play an important role in a democratic society. They believe that the filibuster embodies the spirits of democracy to protect the minority from oppression in the United States. Reformers or skeptics of the filibuster, on the other hand, believe that filibusters sometimes severely hinder the operations of the government. Although people have witnessed many filibusters in history, the number of filibusters in the past few years surprised and infuriated many in America.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Mann and Ornstein argue that the Legislative Branch is the most important branch of Congress. Each branch is given specific powers and responsibilities, many of which overlap. However, “it is clear, when push comes to shove, that Congress can trump the other two branches” (14). Congress struggles to keep its head above the water when communicating with the other branches. Article One of the Constitution was about the Legislative branch, and was twice as long as Article Two, about the Executive branch, and

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

Contributing to the deadlock of congress is the agenda of individual politicians. In the case of many elected officials, it is not the main objective to do best for their people, but

Read More

More about Analysis Of An American Conspiracy By Alan C. Moore

Related Topics

Open Document