ipl-logo

Analysis Of Existentialist's Guide To Death, The Universe And Nothingness

363 Words2 Pages

The personified form of existentialism, which commends the solitary existentialist legend, is customized for being connected with the defeating story of disabled. Furthermore, beyond any doubt enough, we see this in two or three mainstreams on existentialism by Gary Cox. One of them, The Existentialist's Guide to Death, The Universe and Nothingness, utilizes disabled for instance of lacking honesty, differentiating "floundering in incapacity" versus rising above it (2012, 65-66) – as if these are the main two choices of relationship to one's handicap! The other, How to be an Existentialist: or How to Get Real, Get a Grip, and Stop Making Excuses, has a protracted discourse of Sartre on inability, from Being and Nothingness. Sartre had stated, "Even this handicap from which I endure I have accepted by the very truth that I live; I outperform it toward my own undertakings, I make of it the fundamental snag for my being, and I cannot be injured without picking myself as disabled" (Sartre 1966, 402).6 As Cox clarifies, "Sartre is stating absolutely that a handicapped individual is not his incapacity but rather his openly picked reaction to his inability and his greatness of it" (Cox 2009, 51) To clarify, Cox recounts the story (obviously!) of a disabled individual climbing Mount Snowdon (a mountain, obviously!): …show more content…

[… ] It made me ponder, who in this world is truly debilitated? The "challenged person" who dependably propels himself and do however much as he can, or the apathetic, stout individual who dependably picks the delicate alternative and does as meagre as could reasonably be expected with the exception and rationalizing? Maybe the main crippled individuals in this world are the individuals who have an incapacitating state of mind. (Cox 2009,

More about Analysis Of Existentialist's Guide To Death, The Universe And Nothingness

Open Document