ipl-logo

Analysis Of Frankenstein: The Parallels Of Modern Science

1213 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Frankenstein mary shelley literary analysis

Samuel Osborn
Mrs. Joyner
Honors English IV Period.1
8 December, 2015
“The Parallels of Modern Science and Frankenstein”
The novel “Frankenstein”, and its main character Victor Frankenstein’s research parallels the research of many scientists today. In the book Victor created life by modifying and reviving a dead body. In modern times we genetically modify things, and we could technically bring people back as clones. Modifying and giving life to things that nature could not do on its own. Victor and the scientists of now do or did these things without thinking of any kind of consequence, and complete disregard of what could happen. This is all in their endless hunger for finding out the unknown, and being blinded by “good intentions”.
Victor …show more content…

He saw what he had done, and regretted it since. “...now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.”(Shelly,35). He was too devoured by his pursuit of creating the monster to realize what he was doing. He was also blinded by good intentions of fixing problems.
A near perfect example of a Frankenstein situation is, the issue of genetic modification on humans and cloning of human beings. The scientists responsible for this field feel that a lot of good will come from the situation. Although the chance of doing good exists, just like Victor creating the monster, the chance is slim to none. Also we have no clue how far they will take the research in their “pursuit of good”. Plus their is a question of the ethics and how the clones will be treated by their creators.
Most experiments performed come under three guidelines as to why the experiment was done or even considered. The first is utilitarian motivation, the scientist believes that it can be used for the greater good of man and solve whatever problem is at hand. The second is curiosity-driven, the scientist is wondering the basis of life and how it was created. The third is wealth generation, the scientist and the company want another way to make money, whether it is from a new product or a modified version of a current product. …show more content…

It is wrong. Victor Frankenstein did not realize that until it was too late. That is why his creation from bad immoral science, killed everyone that he loved and that he cared about. The science of today is no different and is susceptible to the same mistakes that Victor had made. Especially in the fields of cloning, genetic modification, and synthetic biology. Where one step in the wrong direction can change everyone’s lives, and the world that everyone lives in. The only thing that keeps the world of science in check is a few laws and a thin veneer of morals.

Shelly, Mary. Frankenstein. Dover Publications, 1994. Print.
"HUMAN CLONING PROHIBITION ACT OF 2001 AND THE CLONING PROHIBITION ACT OF 2001." Online posting. www.commdocs.house.gov. N.p., Web. 15 Dec. 2015.
"HUMAN CLONING PROHIBITION ACT OF 2001 AND THE CLONING PROHIBITION ACT OF 2001." Online posting. www.commdocs.house.gov. N.p., Web. 15 Dec. 2015.
"Synthetic Biology." Online posting. Synthetic Biology.www.churchofscotland.org.uk. Church of Scotland, May 2010. Web. 16 Dec.

Show More
Related
706 Words | 3 Pages

The Mad Scientist By Dani Lelinski Although the book “Frankenstein” is a work of fiction, it presents the reader with many moral dilemmas. Mary Shelley’s main character, Victor Frankenstein, is most often presented with these ethical choices and, more often than not, fails miserably. Victor makes a living creature out of body parts and is soon horrified with the results.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

To begin, in the first story "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley it is about the Dr. Frankenstein who is creating his monster. This passage is Frankenstein talking to another person about the creation, but not fully telling him what he has made. This creation is a breakthrough in the science world in this quote it shows how he thinks this is a major break through, "After days and nights of incredible labor and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life; nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless

Read More
2906 Words | 12 Pages

According to Johnathan Morris, cloning may offer the potential

Read More
110 Words | 1 Pages

Mulkay expressed that articles had written had focus on the similarity between embryo researchers and Mary Shelley 's scientific villain. Based on the articles, readers believed that the the scientists are dangerous and must have a limit over them. This connect back to my thesis is that in Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein went overboard into creating the monster as it came to life by using science and the monster threatened society. As he misused science, he went over the limit into creating another human being with dead human parts. In Brave New World, the D.H.C and other scientists are misused science for cloning and conditioning human beings as they used scientific experiment.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

Victor Frankenstein's obsession with creating life is fueled by his desire to unlock the secrets of the universe, but he fails to consider the consequences of his actions. He becomes so consumed by his research that he loses sight of the humanity that should guide scientific inquiry. As a result, his creation becomes a monster that threatens the very fabric of society. Furthermore, the novel also highlights the dangers of the pursuit of knowledge without regard for the consequences.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Victor’s desire for knowledge to create life causes him to ignore the implications of his actions and the harm his experiment can cause. When he is successful in bringing his creation to life, his sense of accomplishment turns into horror and disgust. Victor’s power leads to his downfall by bringing the creature to life. The theme of pursuing knowledge is evident in the book and reinforces the idea that it can have disastrous and irreversible

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

Which is shown in Victor’s egotistical ways, where he challenges himself with new knowledge. In volume 1 chapter 2, Victor’s professor makes the connection of old study of philosophy to the modern philosophy that influenced Victor to pursue the creation of life stating that “So much has been done, exclaimed the soul of Frankenstein—more, far more, will I achieve; treading in the steps already marked, I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation”(Shelley 29). Victor studies the reminence of human beings in order to discover new knowledge. Victor drive is to understand the true nature of life. This desire to uncover the nature of life leads to his creation of the

Read More
146 Words | 1 Pages

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley has been an American classic for almost 200 years, which contains both philosophical and moral themes in the text, making the reader question the limits of humankind and its desire for power. For every character presented in the story their independent desire to overcome their intentions becomes so intense that the future that lies upon them is nothing close to what they can imagine. Victor Frankenstein´s desire to quench his thirst for power ends up clouding his judgement and making him elude the future that awaits him. As Victor´s intention to succeed in natural sciences grow to an abnormal point, his judgement about what to do with that knowledge didn't let him contemplate the future consequences

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, both Victor and his monster deal with times where they are separated from society. Like Victor some may take time to enjoy what their passionate about, but others will feel miserable like the monster did. The story is an example of how society impacts people, and the importance of feeling accepted by

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

Frankenstein shows many examples of how easily too much power leads to destruction. Victor Frankenstein and his creature struggle for power the most. Frankenstein begins to realize the consequences of playing God when the monster he creates demands to gain dominance over him by committing acts of hate and murder. Frankenstein’s loved ones. Nature does not allow Frankenstein or his creation to live an easy life after the natural cycle of life is thrown off course.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

He collects Cornelius Agrippa and Paracelsus’s theories and submerges in science enticement. In university, his success in chemistry also builds up to his passion. Victor’s improvement of the chemistry instruments is introductory to his life-long goal, which is to create a human life. As Victor longs to penetrate the secret of natures, he decides to create a human creature from his own hands. He avidly examines the cause of life and death, the structure of human frame, and the principles of life.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Victor Frankenstein spent his college life working on his so called project. “I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an intimate body” (Page 35). Frankenstein is a hard working man that spent all of his time to do something that everyone thought was impossible to do and did not know the consequences to the act. He did not think over what would happen if he did bring this human that he has recreated back to life and how it would react.

Read More
869 Words | 4 Pages

He was deemed a “modern day” mad scientist. This statement is inaccurate as no evidence suggested that he had planned on using the beast for evil purposes. He had also tried to correct his mistake after discovering what an error he had made by not creating another monster in addition to his first one. However, did he make the right decision?

Read More
1801 Words | 8 Pages

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is closely related to the current issue of genetic engineering. Shelley’s main character, Victor Frankenstein, is a scientific engineer who brings different parts of people’s bodies together to make a new creation. This new creation at first seemed good to Victor however, he was eventually overcome by it. Genetic engineering is not only gene manipulation; it is a desire to take parts of an organism and create a new living thing. Shelley was 17 years old when she wrote Frankenstein almost 200 years ago and although young, her perceptions of what is good or evil, what is beautiful or monstrous, are topics today that are discussed in relation to genetic engineering, gene manipulation and mutation.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and his creature, both display a sense of moral ambiguity. Each character has committed both good and evil alike, and neither knew the consequences of what they had done. However, Victor Frankenstein is generally the morally ambiguous character by his treatment of his creation and his own imperious personality. He wanted to be able to help science by recreating life or bringing it back, but at the same time, he did not want to consider the consequences of doing so. Victor tries to prove himself as a good moral character in the relationship between his creation and himself.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Frankenstein: The Parallels Of Modern Science

Related Topics

Open Document