Analysis Of Higher Education Through Discombobulation By Betsy Chitwood
Summary In Andrew Delbanco's essay, College At Risk, he talks about college education in America and at some different points, he compares them to other countries education systems. In the beginning of his essay, the basis of American college education is discussed, and how furthering your education past high school helps us become productive adults. It is also mentioned how college is a place to expand your knowledge and critical thinking skills. It is pointed out that other countries may have a better education system and possibly outperform the U.S. when it comes to certain jobs.
Liz Addison’s essay, “Two Years Better Than Four,” was first published in the New York Times Magazine back in September of 2007. Addison went to two community colleges and majored in biology; earning her degree in 2008. In her essay, she is responding to Rick Perlstein's article “What’s the Matter with College?” in which he claims, “College as America used to understand it is coming to an end” (211). Addison refutes Perlstein’s claims by saying, “My guess, reading between the lines, is that Mr. Perlstein has never set foot in an American community college” (212).
Alfred Lubrano the author of “the shock of Education: How college Corrupts” explains the differences and difficulties of what students can go through while they are in college. Lubrano says that when a student arrives at college, they lose their connection to their families. This is due to the extreme workload put on the student by the professors they don’t have the time to really chat with their parents like they used to when they lived at home. Also if there is an enormous distance gap where the students go to college and where their parents live it may create that sense like they don’t know each other anymore. I agree do with Alfred that college students change once they go to college they start grow apart from their families.
He gets his evidence from actual teenagers experiencing depression and self-image issues. Both writers make logical claims and appeal to logos, ethos, and pathos. With the use of these three things these writers claims’ are much more
Liz Addison’s essay, “Two Years Better Than Four,” was first published in the New York Times Magazine back in September of 2007. Addison went to two community colleges and majored in biology; earning her degree in 2008. In her essay, she is responding to Rick Perlstein's article “What’s the Matter with College?” in which he claims, “College as America used to understand it is coming to an end” (211). Addison refutes Perlstein’s claims by saying, “My guess, reading between the lines, is that Mr. Perlstein has never set foot in an American community college” (212).
The Greek Philosopher Aristotle identified “The years between puberty and age twenty-one as the formative time for mind and character.” It was customary for young Greek men to attend a series of lectures that resembled our notion of a college “course”(Delbanco 36). Aristotle is a believer of education and the power it has on the development of the young mind. Likewise, he believes college is a place to establish one’s character. Caroline Bird’s essay, “Where College Fails Us,” definitely does not correlate with the opinion of Aristotle.
“3 Reasons College Still Matters” by Andrew Delbanco 3) “Surely, every American college ought to defend this waning possibility, whatever we call it. And an American college is only true to itself when it opens its doors to all - the rich, the middle, and the poor - who have the capacity to embrace the precious chance to think and reflect before life engulfs them. If we are all serious about democracy, that means everyone.” 4) In this part of the writing Andrew Delbanco tries to persuade his audience by using the pattern of logic that agrees with the overall argument but also considers another striking point of view to strengthen the argument (While these arguments are convincing, they must also consider…).
Addison and Perlstein both incorporate ethos in their articles to establish credibility. Perlstein effectively uses facts and concrete figures to aid his argument. Although using concrete figures aid Perlstein’s use of logic, it also contributes to his credibility because the audience can see that he adds outside sources to his article and the readers start to trust Perlstein. Once again using outside sources to aid his argument, Perlstein often quotes specific sources. Perlstein stated that “Doug Mitchell, editor at the Chicago Press, once said, 'I suspect I got in this university primarily because I had a high-school friend who got a pirated copy of Henry Miller 's 'Tropic of Capricorn”’ (Perlstein).
Sanders offers a new perspective of angle on the concept of learning. When thinking of learning, most jump to memorization or intelligence, but Sanders argues that is not actually learning. He views learning as improving one’s self-image and comprehension so that they can use those skills in the future. He also offers a new perspective on the questions to ask about a college education. One shouldn’t ask how can I get my degree, but rather how they can get the most out of their degree.
This shows that as scholar- practitioners we are continuing to learn and be educated. Within the field of psychology, the role of a practitioner-scholar is to build their ability to synthesis theory and application with an emphasis on application. Practitioner-scholars study and obtain research and knowledge to understand the current and previous studies
People see that confusion and disorientation as something bad and has always made them uncomfortable and embarrassed, but maybe that might not be a bad thing, according to “Higher Education Through Discombobulation” by Betsy Chitwood. She says that confusion and disorientation leads to a learning process that more people should use because it has help a lot in their learning. She quoted “ Confusion and disorientation are important in the learning process because these emotions force us to go beyond what we know in search of answers”. Having in answer to a problem make us feel great accomplish but knowing that the process will be confusion even frustrated can lead to a better understand and will be harder to forget. And problem that you have
Martha Nussbaum, then reminds the reader that these types of colleges are very active in class and to stay afloat in them, it’s highly recommended that you participate in class, no longer can just relax and look out of the class’s windows and expect to pass, “is its characteristic emphasis on the active participation of the child in inquiry and questioning.” This relates back to what Ronald Barnett wrote about. Both writers are trying to convince their readers that college is no place to fool around. If you plan on succeeding you must push yourself, ask questions, participate in classes and do hours of library work that might just lead you nowhere. College is a time to grow and isn’t always
Can Two Be Greater Than Four? Does college really matter? Has college lost its rite to passage appeal? Can one still go to college and be successful in the pursuit of self-discovery? These are the types of questions that Liz Addison challenges in her short essay “Two Years Are Better Than Four”. By taking into account my own experience as a current community college student and advocate, in this response to Addison’s essay I choose to elaborate on her views of community college being better than a four year university in the sense of offering a better college experience.
Going to college for many students is just a normal part of life. It is what will enable them to get an education that eventually will lead to get a well-paid job and the resources and the status to live a comfortable life. But for college professor, Andrew Delbanco, the American college has a higher purpose. In the article “College at Risk”, Delbanco states that colleges should be promoting critical thinking among students, through knowledge of the past and the interaction with each other; as well as, help them discover their talents and passions and figure out what they want to do in life. This type of education is called liberal arts and for Delbanco, it represents the ideal education.
Reasoning (explain what the above textual evidence means & how it supports your claim) ___ The reason that I used this Document was because It explains how single teens will do better off in life because their parents are not focusing on one child more than the
More about Analysis Of Higher Education Through Discombobulation By Betsy Chitwood
Compare And Contrast College At Risk By Andrew Delbanco
270 Words | 2 PagesLick Perlstein's Two Years Better Than Four
1259 Words | 6 PagesThe Shock Of Education: How College Corrupts By Alfred Lubrano
896 Words | 4 PagesDavid Berreby Tribe
963 Words | 4 PagesCommunity College In Liz Addison's Two Years Better Than Four
1259 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of 'Where College Fails Us' By Caroline Bird
838 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Three Reasons College Still Matters By Andrew Delbanco
869 Words | 4 PagesLiz Addison Two Years Are Better Than Four Summary
1531 Words | 7 PagesBecoming A Learner
1664 Words | 7 PagesMcclintock's Scholar Practitioner Model
479 Words | 2 PagesHigher Education Through Discombobulation Analysis
253 Words | 2 PagesEducation For Democracy Martha Nussbaum Analysis
671 Words | 3 PagesTwo Years Are Better Than Four
909 Words | 4 PagesCollege At Risk Summary
545 Words | 3 PagesOne Child Policy
1160 Words | 5 Pages