The Harlem Hellfighters, written by Max Brooks, is a fiction book based off the African American 369th Infantry Regiment in 1919. In this novel, Brooks concentrates mainly on the major obstacles African American soldiers faced during World War I. He focuses on how these challenges affects their lives and is very thorough when expressing his own opinions and perspectives. He talks about the hardships and social aspects of their daily lives as well as the harsh reality of the war, that make it more appealing to the readers. Brooks centralized theme was about the challenges and discrimination of African Americans during the war, how it affected their lives emotionally and physically, and what was done to amend these challenges.
Discrimination
…show more content…
The unjust treatment of African American soldiers was undeniable. They did not get the same approach and justice as white men. For instance, in the novel when the soldiers were beginning their weapon training, the white men were issued real guns while the African American’s were issued broomsticks. “Uniforms...were issued first to white boys while most colored troops had to train in our original civvies. White troops also got issued firearms. Spankin new Springfields fresh from the factory while we trained...with broomsticks.” (page 34) This was an adequate example of the unfair treatment; they did not receive the same benefits and entitlements. Another example of this was when the government intentionally attempted to sabotage the African American troops by sending them to Spartanburg, …show more content…
They were ordinary men who sacrificed their lives to save the country, but were not given the respect and honor they deserved. An example of them using their name, “The Harlem Hellfighters”, as a positive point was when Colonel Reginald Sanders said, “"We did not give ourselves our name. Our enemies gave us our name, [which] is an honor." They were putting the unfairness aside and worked together and did what was possible to try to win the war. Brooks did a very good job demonstrating the attitudes of the men and how they felt towards each other. He really shows the everyday discrimination, even though these men fought for their country just like their white peers. Brooks incorporated real life examples in the novel which grabbed the attention to the readers, making the mood more emotional and melancholy. A major example of the discrimination between them, even though they accomplished the same things is when the African American men were not allowed to march in the parade. “See, the rest of the New York national guardsmen, the “rainbow division”, they marched off to war in this grand parade. All flags and music and whatnot. It felt like a party where everybody in new york city was invited...everybody but us. We weren’t asked to march with the “rainbow division” because, as we were
Stephen L. Harris has written on this regiment directly, in his book “Harlem's Hell Fighters: The African-American 369th Infantry in World War I.” In his book, he describes the challenges the Hellfighters faced to even reach a position where they could enter combat, including racism at home and within a segregated military. Harris also covers how the Hellfighters had an impact in race issues, culture, and the war effort. The Harlem Hellfighters are depicted as obedient and working to prove their value as soldiers in an effort to extend more opportunities to black Americans.
As a great author, Himes effectively identify the racism and racial power in wartime Los Angeles and applies metaphors and characterization to reveal a reality that the white group uses the power to discriminate, segregate, and oppress minorities in order to limit their rights and deprive them of their opportunities to move upward. Bob’s reaction to inequalities and oppression reflects African Americans’ emotional plight when living in the white world. Finally, many minorities like Bob are forced to join the army to serve the country that makes them experience racism. However, their fights, struggles, and achievements will be a prelude to the future Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and ’60s for people of color in the U.S.
This desire was met with road blocks and opposition so that whites could continue to feel superior. In an attempt to give truth to the claims that blacks were ignorant and incapable of handling advanced aircrafts, the Airmen were given inferior equipment and facilities. Despite these blatant displays of inequality and attempts to make them fail, they were determined to succeed and help the country win the war. The Airmen were still treated unfairly after the war was over despite the many accomplishments that they achieved in the war.
African American demanded the right to serve in combat rather than support the cause, and once given access to combat roles, it was difficult to desegregate the armed forces. Even
1. Explain the author's primary point. The author seeks to bring to light the unfair treatment of the Negros by the whites in the places they live in. He also seeks to show that leaders only make empty promises to their people. Brutal cases are most among the Negros as they are attacked and their cases go unnoticed or ignored.
Secondary Sources Walker’s article Race and Recruitment in World War I: Enlistment of Visible Minorities in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, discusses racism specifically towards the visible minorities during World War 1 in Canada. The article focuses on the racism experience by the Indians, blacks, and Japanese men, who although volunteered to give their time to serve in the war could not due to stereotypes that were upon them. In the introduction of this article, there is no doubt that racism was evident during this time, yet Walker questions, if World War 1 in Canada was a “white man’s war” meaning only whites are able and capable of fighting for this nation.
Many African-Americans were treated unequally after the Civil War. In source 1, the text states that racial tensions across the country were extremely high after the Civil War, and African Americans continued to deal with oppression (source 1, paragraph 1). This evidence proves that even though African Americans were no longer slaves after the Civil War, they still were being treated unfair. With that in mind, many African Americans had experienced horrible times during the 1800s just because of the color of their skin. According to source 1, back in the 1800s, there were “whites only train cars” and “blacks only train cars”, and the cars were not the same quality (source 1, paragraph 5).
Agustin Banuelos Hist 313 Prof. Diana Reed December 6, 2015 Word Count: African-Americans in the South (1910’s - 1920’s) America in the 1920’s was not as friendly and diverse as it is today. Many ethnic groups were discriminated against and hated by the general populace. A group that is a great example of just how much America has changed in its short span of two-hundred-and-thirty-nine years.
We are fully armed, and equipped, have done all the various duties pertaining to a Soldier’s life…” (Gooding, 221). The blood of his fellow man has stained the ground that protected Union, so they deserve to be paid as equals to those of a lighter skin. Time after time, before and during the war, black men were refused the privilege to fight for their nation. Now that their country needs them most, the question remains as to why they are not equally treated and rewarded as others who fight for the same thing.
The whites would call out African Americans by saying racist things and not accept them more than slaves. Also, they were beaten by the British soldiers. Along with that, the British soldiers “burned and looted, and pulled down the houses of free blacks who underbid their labor in the area.” (Nash
When a story aligns itself so deliberately with real individuals from history and strongly claims to have rights of representation of events on lands where they actually took place in the way Gettysburg chose to do from the very beginning of the film, it automatically takes responsibility for accuracy. Leaving out the important portrayals of how life was for the Confederate and Union Armies by failing to fill in the background makes the Confederates meeting the criteria of passive racists by simply applying slurs when in fact the invasion of Virginia opened up opportunities for their actively aggressive racism and physical oppression of all African-Americans of Gettysburg. By having the only African-American in the film be featured as an escaped prisoner whose only salvation was provided by the Federal Army dismisses the background role of African-Americans throughout the entire war as cooks, tailors, and construction workers. The story is told strictly from the perspective of the important people during the Battle of Gettysburg but did not accurately portray the community and daily life of the Civil War, the decisions of those in command affected citizens in Gettysburg at the time. We see this occurrence in other events described in modern-day history, including the portrayal of Napoleon, Alexander The Great, Julius Caesar, and Christopher Columbus.
Slavery, the War on Black Family While slavery in America was an institution that was started over 400 years ago, the affects were so horrific that it is still felt today by modern day African Americans. Many families had to deal with the constant stress of being sold which made it difficult to have a normal family life. Slaves were sold to pay off debts, an owner dying and his slaves were sold in an estate sale, or when an owner’s children would leave the home to begin a life of their own, they would take slaves with them. Often times, children were not raised by their parents, other family members of someone designated to watch the children because the mother and father had to work long hours and the children were too young to join them.
Bloods: Black Veterans of the Vietnam War The historical identity of the African American military experience is deeply rooted in the life and legacy of author Wallace Terry. His legacy has been immortalized in the scores of periodicals and columns he authored throughout his career. Well-read and well-traveled, he brought a balanced context to the field of journalism. To date, he is one of Black America’s greatest contributors to African American journalism.
Ian Pruett-Jones 11-18-2014 Anise K. Strong History 3015 Second Paper- Glory Battle Glory is a film that was released in 1989 and is centered on the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, the first formal unit of the Union Army during the Civil War to be made up entirely of African-American men. The film deals largely with the theme of a group of downtrodden men looking to fight for their freedom and for their country, only to be met with scorn and disdain from almost every person they meet. The film is a testament to how, even though many people believe that the Union Army’s only noble goal was to free the slaves of the South, there was still a massive amount of prejudice held by many of the Union soldiers. In fact, in the entire movie,
A young soldier wrote a letter to the NAACP “ If I fight, suffer, or die it will be for the freedom of every black man to live equally with other races. If the life of the Negro in the United States is right as it is lived today, then I would rather be dead” (Takaki 23). Camp conditions for black soldiers were degrading, they could not go to church services, and other training programs were segregated. Despite these conditions, African Americans contributed significantly to the war effort with support work and had some of the toughest battalions, including the well-respected 99th Pursuit Squadron and 332nd Fighter Group.