Analysis Of Nesting: New Middletown's Extreme Social Control

1402 Words6 Pages

“One by one, our rights are being stripped. Freedom of movement, freedom of speech, [and] freedom of organization,” (Austen, p. 91) which are being caused by New Middletown’s extreme social control. Undoubtedly, extreme social control comes with the cost of fear and suffering of its citizens. In this case, Nesting, an extreme social control, that makes all children behave “good” required to hold Max and Dallas against their will, causing them harm through fear and suffering. Furthermore, the extreme social control, Nesting, mainly targets the freedom of expression. However, without freedom of expression, New Middletown’s citizens will be harmed by the removal of the driving human spirit that demands for self-expression. Consequently, causing an alarming state of mind, such as constant mental breakdowns that is harmful for humans. Finally, not …show more content…

In this case, the use of Nesting, which carries out to a massive scale that hold New Middletown’s citizens against their own will. Consequently, making extreme social control come with the cost of harm by the means of fear and suffering. In addition, the extreme social control, Nesting, removes the freedom of expression. Causing the removal of the human spirits that demands for self-expression, and consequently causing an unhealthy state of mind, such as what Max has experienced during his football match versus the Devils. Finally, extreme social control is harmful to citizens by misleading them from the truth through the regulation of information accessible to citizens of New Middletown. Making New Middletown’s citizens make uninformed choices that can harmfully affect them. Therefore, as stated by Xavier, “we have to limit corporate liberties for our safety” (Austen, p. 89), because extreme social control is clearly harmful to New Middletown’s