Claim #3: Even though Oedipus was ignorant of his crimes of patricide, he is still guilty of them because if anyone else killed his father, the gods would still unleash a plague if it went unsolved. Citation: “Oedipus: If I had eyes, I do not know how I could bear the sight of my father, when I came to the house of Death, or my mother: for I have sinned against them both.”
Oedipus was cursed when he was a baby and found out his destiny when the god Apollo showed him a vision saying “You are fated to couple with your mother, you will bring a breed of children into the light no man can bear to see- you will kill your father, the one who gave you life!” (Sophocles 873-875) However, Oedipus did not know that the ones who found him and raised him as his son were not his parents. After the prophecy, Oedipus decided to run away to try to change his fate even though it was already set to kill his father and sleep with his mother, unfortunately he couldn’t do anything about it. “Its mine alone, my destiny-I am Oedipus!”
Upon receiving the prophecy that he would kill his father and marry his mother, he unquestioningly embraced its validity without challenging it. However, if he employed his common knowledge and free will, the course of events might have been altered. For instance, he tragically killed Laius in a dispute that could have been avoided with restraint. Additionally, when tasked with uncovering the murderer of the former king of Thebes, Oedipus willingly accepted the challenge, firmly believing it was his destiny to expose the killer and save his city. Unfortunately, his unwavering trust in fate and blind devotion to prophecies ultimately led to his downfall.
Oedipus sees what he wants if it makes him innocent. Oedipus’ altercations with others
Background Information: In Oedipus the King, by Sophocles, Oedipus was told that he would kill his father Laius and marry his mother Jocasta. However, Oedipus doesn’t believe that he killed Laius but was blind to the truth for him accept it which led to his demise. 3.Thesis Statement:
Oedipus Rex essay Final draft Oedipus certainly deserved his fate. Oedipus and his actions are clearly disrespect to the gods , he faces the fate he deserves. He was doing things that would eventually lead up to the unfortunate event of his death , he was even warned by the great and wise Teiresias , but he being himself was to stubborn and did not listen. All the things Teiresias said would happen became the truth. He killed his father, married his mother, yet he tempted his fate , he deserved everything that came his way .
In Sophocles' Oedipus the King, the themes of fate and agency are very strong throughout the play. Both sides of the argument can be greatly supported. The attributes of a person have either a positive or negative affect on the choices that they make. For Oedipus, his main attribute was the desire for knowledge and understanding about his own life. Because of this strong will and desire, this was Oedipus’ driving force in the play to lead him to the truth of his beginnings.
The fate of Oedipus was not his own but he caused a disruption of a nation that could have been
One of the men he killed was the king Laius fulfilling the first part of the prophecy. But it is not as if Oedipus sought out his father for the sake of murdering him, in fact the murder may seem justified, he was hit, so he hit back, but this is what he is punished for. Had he not been on the road in flight from Corinth, he would not of been assaulted, so he would not have (rightly) retaliated. Oedipus’ only crime is leaving Corinth, something Oedipus saw as completely necessary, he committed the murder because he did what was right. Since he had no intention of doing wrong, especially something as heinous as killing his father and sleeping with his mother, there
Oedipus throughout the novel shows that he is brave and a good leader, however he can not control what is actually going to happen. He can’t control his fate because the definition of fate is the development of events beyond a person 's control, regarded as determined by a supernatural power. This means that however hard Oedipus tries to control what is going to happen he cannot escape his fate. The definition also States that it is a development or change over time. The readers knows from the prologue that Oedipus in the end did kill his father and marries his mother.
As we go about our daily lives, we are acquiring knowledge from our surroundings through the lens of our eyes. Henceforth, many describes knowledge as a mirror, where our knowledge is defined by our perception : this aspect of knowledge is extremely beneficial in terms of confirming the validity of knowledge itself . Nonetheless, not all the time what we see are true, there are exceptional situations when everything is not always what it seems. Compared to a mirror, our knowledge is also limited because we only see what perspective allows us to, we seldom think beyond what our eyes reveal to us.
In the tragic play Oedipus Tyrannus written by Sophocles, Oedipus, the king of Thebes, must uncover his own sins in order to save the city from the plague. In Lysistrata, Aristophanes takes a more comedic approach and tells a story of a band of women who defeat the political establishment by withholding sex from their husbands. While these stories may seem dissimilar from each other, both these tragic and comedic plays have problematic beginnings. Although both Oedipus Tyrannus and Lysistrata open with a problem, in a comedy the problem is minor and can be solved through the characters teamwork as opposed to in a tragedy where the problem is intolerable and cannot be fixed without causing further damage.
Sophocles was born in Colonus, Hippius, which is now part of Athens, in the year of 496 BC and he was a Greek playwright in drama. Sophocles was not only a Greek philosopher but he was also a politician, priest, and a military leader. Sophocles and two other philosophers, Euripides and Aeschylus, were mainly known as the masters of tragedy. Sophocles was the most successful of the three and always won in play competitions and “never had the ignominy of being voted third” (Cartwright) place. It is said that Sophocles wrote about 120 plays but only a few of them have survived up to this date.
It all seems predestined that Oedipus would end up murdering his father and committing incest with his mother. However from my personal point of view, I think that the whole series of tragic events that had happened in King Oedipus can totally be thwarted. This tragedy could be well avoided from the beginning through the decision made by perhaps his parents or even the different characters in the plot. Ironically, we could also say that it is also the decisions made by these people in various situations that result in the tragedy. I believe that there will be a plot twist even if only one mid-event got changed.
Oedipus the King is one of the most ironic plays ever written. Sophocles, the author, is a famous philosopher of the ancient times The Play is about Oedipus, the king of Thebes, who kills his father and marries his mother. An oracle warned Laius, the king of Thebes prior to Oedipus, that his son would murder him. Accordingly, when his wife, Jocasta, had a son, he exposed the baby by first pinning his ankles together. The infant, who was adopted by King Polybus of Corinth and his wife was then brought up as their very own.
