ipl-logo

Analysis Of St. Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

1128 Words5 Pages

The Cosmological argument is an argument that is put forward by the Christian Philosopher named St. Thomas Aquinas (who was around between the times of 1225-1274). This argument was made as an attempt in order to prove the existence of God. However, Aquinas had always had strong belief in God, this therefore meant that instead of trying to prove his existence, it was more as if he was trying to solidify his established faith that’s based on reason, through looking at the cause of the Universe. Due to this, Aquinas claims that this is the work of God.
The word ‘cosmological’ practically explains what the argument is about. The first part of the word ‘Cosmos’ relates to the world or the universe, therefore, it means that the Cosmological Argument is one talking about the come bouts of the world/universe around us, and it also argues for the existence of God. This argument looks at the universe around us and it seeks explanations for the reason it exists. The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists. This is done by showing that there cannot …show more content…

In our world, cause and effect are perfectly natural and have always been as it is an everlasting cycle. Whatever happens will always be caused by something else. If one was to say that that something was able to cause itself as it would mean that it was already there before it had begun. The reason this would be a logical impossibility is because in order for something to cause there must be a necessary being beforehand, meaning that there needs to be a first cause. In this case, it is called God. Aquinas identified a series of cause as well as effects in the universe. He however rejected the idea of an idea of infinite series of causes as he believed that there must have been a first uncaused cause. This first uncaused cause would have started the change of other causes that then would have resulted in all events happening. This first cause was

Show More
Related
946 Words | 4 Pages

“The Cosmic perspective” Written by Neal deGrasse Tyson, is an essay that goes in-depth on the beauty of the universe. At the beginning of the essay, Tyson talks about how the ideas of astronomy came from simple beginnings scientifically but have advanced with humanity. In Addition to this, Tyson talks about how the scientific perspective can only be studied by those with the privilege of not focusing on survival. Tyson gives a litany of examples demonstrating how science has increased humanity's collective knowledge. Tyson's main idea in the text is that the cosmic perspective allows us to see the beauty of the universe beyond earth, and why we should focus more on getting all members of society to that point.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

The objection addressed the validity of the argument which had the premise 1, nothing is the efficient cause of itself except God and premise 2, a chain of causes cannot be infinite. The argument thus concludes there must be a first cause. This conclusion agrees with my thesis that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Cosmological theories have been proposed by different persons in the history as they try to make sense of the universe. Cosmology is a form of religion or a belief that has existed, however there are other several believes that human beings have been putting across to help explain the nature of the universe. Cosmology refers to the study of origin of universe. Origin of universe has been proposed by several theories as dictated by historical facts. Our interest is the religious cosmology, which is composed of beliefs that are based on creation stories.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

So the first cause argument proves that God does not exist assuming the first cause argument is sound then there must be some other cause because it is not God. In summary the notion of omnipotent is a miss-name because it implies the potency, power, causality when in fact all that it does is imply logical entailment, it implies that if it wills something you can deduce from the statement that something exists, you do not need a causal step, it is a logical deduction and therefore the first cause argument argues from causes in the world

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

The cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it

Read More
2363 Words | 10 Pages

Remember that for Aristotle meant something different than what we intend when we say cause. We are referring to an action or event that occurred prior to another. For Aristotle, causes meant explanation. This explanation works fine for a man made article, so how does he explain cause in nature?

Read More
637 Words | 3 Pages

So, I would like to say that he argued which was good and made little bit sense and in those days might be it was one of the emerging argument for the existence of god. But science made some progress in its field and found out the real fact for the existence of universe. We cannot overlook the facts and evidences for the existence of universe. It is the law of science so, we can get the treatment of diseases nowadays. If god was there people would have died due to cancer or other illness.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Argument for the existence of god is being proposed in several ways. Some based on science while some are about personal experience and some on philosophical arguments such as ontological arguments, first cause arguments, arguments based on deign, moral arguments. Each of these support conception. Ontological argument say that if you inculcate the idea of god , we can see him . There is a saying that “Nothing comes from Nothing but something comes from something”.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Pg. 63). The general principles of a cosmological argument are: effects have causes, things happen and things exist for a reason, it’s trying to explain things, and all our sciences, studies, and lives are based on it (McGowan, Michael. N.p.). During Josh Wheaton’s speech in defending his belief, he uses this type of argument and talks about the Big Bang. He talked about how in the 1920s, Belgian astronomer and theist, Georges Lemaitre, said the entire universe jumping into existence in a trillionth of a second, out of nothing, in a flash of light, is how he would expect the universe to respond if God were to actually utter the command in Genesis 1:3, “let there be light”.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Cause and effect can only be discovered through our experiences and us gaining knowledge of the cause and its definite effect to come. Not all ideas have to be experienced before hand, we can use our previous ideas and see a resemblance and just

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

I will start my points in this argument by, first, opposing the evidences and reasons why we should believe that God exists and second, by pointing one of many reasons why we should believe that God does not exist. In opposing

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

When incorporating both science and religion to explain the physical, chemical, and biological origins, one must look at the origin of the cosmos, Earth history, the origin of life, and biodiversity. In doing so, one must maintain a balance between science and religion so that one does not supersede the other. Furthermore, by examining both sides, it will establish an answer that is mutually beneficial for both parties. Starting with the origin of the cosmos, Genesis 1:1 states that God created the universe, Earth, day, and night for nothing. While this story is accepted based on faith, science shows a similar event that resulted in the creation of the universe.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

In this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.

Read More

More about Analysis Of St. Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

Related Topics

Open Document