Analysis Of Supreme Revenge By Brett Kavanaugh

Brett Kavanaugh's nomination hearing was marked by venomous and vitriolic rants that reflected the caustic political climate in America. The documentary's material demonstrates how the Democratic and Republican parties use the judiciary as a political battleground in their contest for power. The Supreme Court has become a politicized, politically dominated body due to a dispute between the two parties that began in the late 1980s. The nominations that were shown in this film were very hasty. Mitch McConnell had a hand in every nomination that was seen in this film. The nomination process seemed like revenge from both parties. That is a sad reality since these decisions might have a long-term impact on American politics and daily life. The FRONTLINE documentary "Supreme Revenge" follows the Republican and Democratic parties' protracted struggle to dominate the Supreme Court. To provide light on the events that took place behind the scenes, the producer has included fragments from conversations with legal professionals, writers, journalists, and workers from Congress and the White House. The documentary opens with a report on Robert Bork's unsuccessful confirmation hearing as a candidate for President Reagan.

That look was caused by either the fact that there will be another Republican in the Supreme Court or because they thought that Brett Kavanaugh was a bad man. Still Mitch McConnell had another win in his belt, and he was given the all-powerful description in this film which was assisted by the Federalist Society. There is even a section towards the end of the film where the Supreme Court is called the McConnell Court. That is an accurate assumption since this film portrays Mitch McConnell as the puppet master for the Supreme Court. Since that is portrayed throughout the whole film it makes the ending scene more compelling because it ends with an image of just Mitch