ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright

1506 Words7 Pages

Spending most of his young adulthood in and out of prisons for minor nonviolent crimes, Clarence Earl Gideon seemed like an unlikely victor when trying to appeal to the United States Supreme Court. In the Supreme Court Case, Gideon v. Wainwright, Clarence Earl Gideon, with the help of cases before him and his well trained attorney, successfully succeeded in persuading the Supreme Court to accept his appeal and rule in his favor by persisting until he received the rights all American’s are granted by the United States Constitution. Clarence Earl Gideon had been convicted of many minor crimes throughout his life, but the crime that set the scene for the case Gideon v. Wainwright, was when Gideon was charged with breaking and entering with the …show more content…

Brady was another case that played a key role in the Supreme Court's rule in favor of Gideon. Smith Betts, a farm hand from a rural county in Maryland was charged with robbery and when he asked to be appointed with counsel, because he was too poor to hire his own, was denied. The judge's explanation was similar to that of Gideon’s by stating, “the practice in Carroll County [is] to appoint lawyers for the indigent only in prosecutions for murder and rape”(Lewis 115). Again similar to Gideon, Betts acted as his own lawyer. Despite his efforts the judge found Betts to be guilty and sentenced him eight years. After some time Betts filed a petition for habeas corpus with the state of Maryland’s court of appeals stating by refusing him a lawyer violated his constitutional rights. Chief Judge Carroll T. Bond review the trial and denied Betts petition. Judge bond believed the trial to be a simply affair stating, “‘in this case it must be said there was little for counsel to do on other side.’ Betts had been able ‘to take care of his own interests’”(Lewis 117). The ruling of Betts v. Brady was highly criticized. The following two cases resulted in reversals of the convictions due to lack of counsel, but after this it became evident the Court was trying to draw the line of which trials to reverse. After these two cases, “in 1947 the Court made it plain that in non-capital cases it was sticking to the flexible rule of Betts v. Brady”(Lewis 118). Betts v. Brady helped to pave …show more content…

Brady affect his duty to Gideon, even though he believed an essential fairness during any criminal trial was representation by a lawyer. Fortas believes the “need for counsel is so obvious that the real argument for Betts v. Brady must be federalism” (Lewis 141). As the trial starts, Fortas begins to be challenged by the justices. He then makes some very crucial points about the Betts case stating that the real argument had to have been the pull of federalism due to the sensitivity of the court. Justice Harlan then challenges him by stating, “‘understanding sensitivity’ seems to me a most unfortunate term to describe one of the fundamental principles of our constitutional system”(Lewis 180). Fortas quickly replies without a flicker of

Show More
Related
1753 Words | 8 Pages

The Salem Witch Trials wrongly convicted over one hundred fifty people through unfair court cases in 1692, due to the bias of the people, the unpassable tests used, and the illegal way they were run. The convictions were all done in the Court of Oyer and Terminer, which was created by the current Governor Sir William Phips, and led by Chief Judge William Stoughton, along with 6 other judges (EB 1) (Boraas 24). This court was closed within the year, and a new court was opened, the Superior Court of Judicature, which was less unfair, and made no convictions during the time it was open. This court was then also closed after a few months (EB 1). During the trials, every sort of person was accused, from rich to poor.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Name Tutor Course Date Marbury v. Madison 1. Summary of the history of the case and its significance on our structure of government.

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

Thompson committed many Brady violations. Brady violations are based on Brady v. Maryland, in which the court required prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence. There was a large lack of stability regarding the main evidence of the case. The victim’s family gave a reward to the person who provided the main evidence of the case in which Thompson was sentenced to the death penalty (Equal Justice Initiative). The prosecutors failed to disclose this information with the defense, and therefore hid a crucial factor of the case.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

A person’s right to have a lawyer and having a fair trial is protected by the Sixth Amendment. These clauses are enforced by Gideon v. Wainwright, where the Supreme Court ruled that criminal defendant has the right to have legal counsel if they could not afford one (“Facts and Case Summary – Gideon v. Wainwright”). Public defenders, or lawyers appointed by the court, provide representation in court without cost to the defendant. Fifty years after the ruling, public attorneys has been under scrutiny by both lawyers and clients. Said counsels are known for facing underfunding and unmanageable caseloads, while their clients claim that they are poorly represented in court.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

In 1838, Henry B. Truett was convicted of the murder of Jacob Early. Early (a physician) and Truett became enraged in a political quarrel; a quarrel that was provoked by Truett. His young, inexperienced attorney—who had been practicing law for less than two years—spoke to the jury in a controversial yet engaging tone. The young attorney painted the events that led to the murder of Early in vivid color for the jury. While Truett had provoked Early, Early’s rage grew to such levels Truett felt his life was in imminent danger.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Gideon’s was found guilty when he didn’t have a court appointed attorney. Gideon was also denied the right to a lawyer because he couldn’t afford one. Gideon assumed the 6th amendment granted him the rights to an attorney, but that wasn’t correct. Gideon would not take “no” for an answer. He decided to write a letter to the Supreme Court and express his concerns of his judge’s decision.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Another argument could have been the fact that the other defendant’s sister was in close relation to Brady which clouded his judgement to make the right descion. If circumstances were different and the prosecution never withheld evidence from the defense the “Brady Rule” would have never been established. Following the proceedings of Brady vs. Maryland the rule was created compelling the prosecution to turn over any evidence to the defense if they require it. So therefore, if the court would have ruled in favor of Brady’s ruling there could have been a chance that Brady’s circumstances would have turned out to be in his favor. Although when Brady took part in the criminal acts with Boblit he must have known there would have been negative consequences for his part in the robbery and murder of Brooks.

Read More
1364 Words | 6 Pages

In this episode of “Criminal Injustice,” with David A. Harris, Harris and guest Beth Schwartzapfel, who is the author of two articles on this set of problems and is a staff writer on the Marshall Project, talk about the Brady v. Maryland rule as well as how this rule is violated daily to the point where it negatively impacts the whole system and why it is long overdue for change on this issue. Back in 1963, the Supreme court decided the case of Brady v. Maryland. In this case, the government withheld crucial evidence from the defense. The supreme court said that if the prosecution has material evidence in its possession that would exonerate or even lessen the punishment the defendant then the prosecution would have disclosed that evidence.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

Since the establishment of the United States Supreme Court in 1789 the role and function of the court has varied depending on the need of the country. There are several different schools of thought when it comes to the purpose and the function that the Supreme Court should take, ranging from strictly ruling on constitutional matters up to weighing in on national policy cases. To evaluate what role the court actually takes, one must examine both the institutional function as well as the political function. Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist No. 78 has been considered one of the most influential pieces of work in the field, as it lays the ground work of what he believed was the role of the court.

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

As though it is not a fundamental right to have an appointed counsel to those who cannot afford one, Betts v. Brady did bring up rather valid points. The Court goes back to the foundation of our “adversary system.” It claims that a person whom has no funds to obtain an attorney is more likely to have an unjust trial. The court states that much money is used to charge or “accuse” defendants of crimes they may or may not have committed. Prosecutors which are lawyers of the government are to be looked at as a necessity to keep public order.

Read More
231 Words | 1 Pages

The prisoner’s rights movement is mostly recognized for the events that occurred through the 1960s until the 1980s but it is important to review cases beforehand that led up to the movement itself. In the case of Pervear v. Massachusetts of 1866 a case was fought through the Supreme Court. The court ruled that prisoners should have no constitutional rights, which concluded the Eighth Amendment did not apply to them. The Eighth Amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (US Const. Amend XIII).

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages


 Foster filed a motion after the trial for post-judgement discovery regarding the prosecution’s notes and records. This motion was denied. Foster then filed a motion for a new trial, restating his previous arguments, and was denied again. In 1988, Foster filed a direct appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court which resulted in an affirmation of the trial court’s ruling concerning the Batson allegations (Bright, 2015, p. 3-4). In 1989, Foster filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Butts County, Georgia to address his intellectual state which temporarily suspended the rest of the case.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Darrow creates a lasting mental impression and invokes fear through his use of graphic imagery and word repetition. The transition from guilt to fear drills deeper into their emotions . During the Scopes Trial, where a man was condemned for teaching evolution, Darrow defends science over religion, as he states that: If today you can take...evolution and make it a crime to teach it in the public school, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools, and the next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. Soon you may set Catholic against Protestant and Protestant against Protestant… (“Attorney for the Damned”187).

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

The role of the jury in capital cases Capital cases that include the death penalty are carefully analyzed and structured to allow the fairest due process. The selection of the jurors is one of the most crucial parts of the case. Attorneys and judges have to come to an agreement on who will serve on the jury before the case goes to trial. There have been many cases that have argued the selection of the jurors, for example, Uttecht v. Brown, Lockhart v. McCree, and many others. These cases have faced controversy due to the selection of jurors and have set precedents for new and present cases.

Read More

More about Analysis Of The Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright

Open Document