“Why We Should Keep the Confederate Monuments Right Where They Are” by John Daniel Davidson is persuasive to an audience of U.S. citizens with the use of rhetorical strategies. Davidson gives the reader interest through the use of authority and expert testimony. He does this by describing President Donald Trump throughout his reading. The audience therefore becomes attracted to this text, because the mention of a big name such as the President, making this text effective. This article is also persuasive through the use of statistical evidence. In the text, there are many instances where statistical evidence is used to help back Davidson’s point. Using this method of evidence gains the readers by presenting interesting findings. The use of statistics …show more content…
Appelbaum interests the reader through the use of expert testimony and authority. He does this by bringing up President Donald Trump. The audience therefore becomes intrigued to this text, due to the description of the President, making his argument effective. This text can also be persuasive with the use of statistical evidence. Embedded in the article, you can find numerical figures that are used to help back Appelbaum’s point. Using statistics gains the readers trust of the article through the use of logos. The use of statistics additionally backs the writer's credibility and appeals to ethos. Later on, Appelbaum persuades his intended audience through the use of historical and current events examples. In the reading, Appelbaum describes how “the city council of Charlottesville voted, a century after it was commissioned, to remove the statue of Robert Edward Lee” (Appelbaum). This quote uses historical evidence to help convince readers to take the statues down using past events that have reflected in today’s events. Appelbaum also uses individual examples in the article. This is best conveyed when Appelbaum tells of General Robert E. Lee’s belief of white supremacy. “I have always observed that wherever you find the negro, everything is going down around him, and wherever you find a white man, you see everything around him improving” (Appelbaum). Appelbaum appeals to pathos through this statement and invokes anger and shock throughout the readers. These emotions persuade the audience to approve the removal of the