ipl-logo

Analysis Of You Still Need Your Brain By Daniel Willingham

607 Words3 Pages

Nowadays when we are not sure of question we turn towards the Internet, to try and find answers. In the Article "You Still Need Your Brain," Daniel Willingham argues that memorizing facts remains an essential skill even in today's world of internet searches. He builds his argument by first acknowledging the importance of technology and then explaining why it cannot replace human memory. . Willingham provides scientific evidence and real-life examples to support his claim, making a compelling case for the value of memorization in our ever-changing world.

Willingham argues that the Internet Is good for learning new things, however It should not come to the point where you use It for your brain's memorazation. In the Article "You Still Need Your Brain" Willingham states " Students should learn the information for which the internet is a poor substitute. Getting information form the internet, takes tiem, so they should memorize facts that are needed fast and frequently. Elementary math facts and the sounds of letters are obvious choices, but any information that is needed with high frequency is a candidate - in algebra , that's the quadratic equation". Willingham infers that rather than looking up facts that we use In our everyday life to instead study and memorize it. Sure this takes longer than just going on the web, but …show more content…

He says the following "The meaning of “spill” depends on context, but dictionaries, including internet dictionaries, necessarily offer context-free meanings. That’s why kids fall off cliffs meticulously." Willingham believes that having background knowledge, context knowledge, in which information is presented Is essential for comprehending and applying that knowledge. Without this knowledge, he thinks that students will struggle to make sense of they see on the web or may misinterpet

Show More
Related

Summary Of A Whole New Mind By Daniel Pink

423 Words | 2 Pages

A Whole New Mind by Daniel Pink discusses the shift of our generation's needs for different types of thinkers. According to the book, there are two types of thinking. Left-directed or left-brained and right-directed or right-brained thinking. L-directed thinkers are much more analytical and factual than R-directed thinkers, who are artistic, sympathetic, and more emotional. In the past, the industrial age required physical laborers, mostly for factory work; however, as the informational age crept in, the need for l-brained people expanded.

Read More

Analysis Of Jason Peters 'Cooling Down Our Brain'

83 Words | 1 Pages

In “Cooling Down Our Brain,” Jason Peters talked about how researchers proved that self-control can be developed by specific mental exercises. He explained an experiment named “the marshmallow test” and how the result of the experiment showed that children who had self-control became more successful in their lives than those who did not have it. The author further stated that additional research showed that the human brain has “hot” and “cool” areas and everyone can train the “cool” part to control the impulses.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

224 Words | 1 Pages

In “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, the author, Nicholas Carr, is arguing against the effect of our increased access to information. He is unsettled by the common idea that we’d all “be better off” if our brains were supplemented, or even replaced, by an artificial intelligence. Carr describes how am immediate access to a rich store of information from the Net has shaped his process of thought by reducing his capacity for concentration and contemplation. He is worried that placing efficiency and immediacy above all else is weakening our capacity to make rich mental connections that form when we read deeply without distraction. Carr uses an anecdote of the printing press to demonstrate how equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

273 Words | 2 Pages

In “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” Nicholas Carr argues that Google is deteriorating the human mind. He mentions that people no longer want or even need to deeply read information and retain it because the particular information that they are looking for can just be Googled. In fact, he argues against this by stating that everything is not available on Google, and things that are available on Google are not necessarily true. Another con of this, he states, is that it is extremely difficult to read off of a computer screen. Carr argues that people’s brains are not programmed to read something in depth if it is off of a computer or phone screen.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

162 Words | 1 Pages

In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” (2008), Nicholas Carr argues that the use of the internet has affected human beings to process information. For example, reading in front of a screen and reading a printed book is not the same thing. Carr supports his assertion by his own and others experiences reading and searching information online and viewing how it has negatively shaped their ability to read long texts. He states that he cannot concentrate reading a long piece for a certain amount of time without losing focus. His purpose is to is to warn the internet and technology users of the adverse mental effects that these devices have on individuals.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

977 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicolas Carr analyzes the dramatic affects that technologies have been having on our brains. The short summary, the Net is making us all mindless zombies in Carr’s mind, but he is not the only who feels that way. His long dragged out article is abundantly full of meaning examples, personal opinions, and hard facts on the drastic changes the Net has done to our brains. Carr starts his articles with the death of super computer, HAL, from the movie A Space Odyssey.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

454 Words | 2 Pages

In Nicholas Carr's article, “Is Google making us Stupid?” (731-745) his thesis is, “...what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation.” (733) According to Carr, the Internet affects the way that we read, think, and live. It affects the way we read because through the continued use of the Internet we have been conditioned to skim through information quickly and efficiently.

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

933 Words | 4 Pages

Nicolas Carr writes in his essay ‘a few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I've got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after'. Mr. Carr is telling us know that we no longer have to go to a library, spend hours going through card catalogs, or haul piles of books to the table in order to search through thousands of pages of text to find the information we are in search of. Instead, we have places online like Google, Yahoo, and Bing which allow us to sit back and literally, at our fingertips, have any and all information humanly possible on the ready. The days of going through an index in an encyclopedia book, sitting in front of a card catalog, or microfiche are days of the past, extinct if you will. Mr. Carr also writes 'my mind now expects to take in information the way the

Read More

Analysis Of Smarter Than You Think By Clive Thompson

204 Words | 1 Pages

In Clive Thompson’s essay, “Smarter Than You Think”, he argues that computers and search engines such as Google actually improve our memory and therefore our ability to analyze information. Thompson bases his theory on the concept of Transactive memory, a social system in which information is shared collectively in a group, with different people assigned key pieces of that information to remember. In Thompson’s opinion, the internet has become that “collective memory” for the people that use it, storing and dispensing knowledge and details more efficiently and accurately than any human could. Though he admits that when humans store information on a computer we’re less likely to personally recall it, he persists that historically human beings

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

1160 Words | 5 Pages

The debate is whether the physical and physiological changes are detrimental. In 2008 The Atlantic publishes an article by Nicholas Carr who discusses his take on the critical conversation presenting what the internet is doing to our brains in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. When analyzing Nicholas Carr’s stance on the argument, one would both agree and disagree with Carr. The

Read More

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

866 Words | 4 Pages

For example, “What happened?’ He speculates on the answer: ‘What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed” Carr says that the internet is a way to seek convenience but also because of the way people think. Overall the cognition of humans are negatively affecting their ability to read long

Read More

Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

606 Words | 3 Pages

Technological advancements are capable of filling people with hope but fear as well. Nicholas Carr has written an intriguing article titled, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” which discusses how technology is changing the way we as humans think. Carr believes that technology is changing us negatively by shortening our attention span and preventing in depth thought and study. Through his article, Carr effectively demonstrates the manner in which technology is negatively impacting the way we think. One effective point Carr uses in his argument is fueled by historical evidence.

Read More

The Shallows Summary

789 Words | 4 Pages

In The Shallows, Nicholas Carr discusses the internet’s effect on human thought. This is perfectly shown in Chapter Nine which is titled “Search, Memory.” Carr speaks on how the internet effects long term memory. The chapter quotes one of the smartest minds in the history of Western Civilization, Socrates. Socrates is quoted, “Writing down their thoughts and reading the thoughts of others had written down, they become less dependent on the contents of their own memory.”

Read More

The Crucible Character Analysis

716 Words | 3 Pages

The Crucible Character Types Antagonist: Abigail Williams stirs up the entire town of Salem against many people, including Elizabeth and John Proctor, because of her selfish ambition to be John’s next wife, as well as her treacherous lust for the power that she gains by accusing innocent people of witchcraft. She even threatens the girls that if they tell the truth (that shes lying ) then she’d – ‘..come to them in the black of some terrible night and shudder them’. She is threatening and clearly evil and the villain.

Read More

The Disadvantages Of The Behaviourist Approach In Education

1025 Words | 5 Pages

The more important the information the more likely the individual will be able to recall that information later. However, the meaning is placed on the information itself and not on how the information obtained, as with the behaviourist approach. Cognitive learning theories deal with the issue of how people process and store information to gain an understanding of themselves and the environment, and how their thinking and reasoning influence their actions and reactions (Henson and Eller,

Read More

More about Analysis Of You Still Need Your Brain By Daniel Willingham

Related Topics

Open Document