ipl-logo

Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

744 Words3 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid?
Many colleges, including the NCAA, believe that college athletes should not be paid. They think that college athletes should focus on getting better and on school and shouldn't have to worry about pay. The NCAA believes that paying for their college pays all on its own, when in reality, many college athletes have to schedule their school around their practice when it should be the other way around. “A key point as to why the NCAA would not want to pay athletes is to maintain the amateur status of its reputation.”(Goldman 1989-1990). If the NCAA didn't make so much money off of these athletes then it would be easier to understand why they won't pay them. It almost seems like they're taking advantage of these young athletes. …show more content…

Most college athletes don't even get the education they were promised. As in they don’t ever have the time to actually sit and think about their school and study, for college athletes it's all about the games and practices. It takes a lot of skill to actually get good grades while doing the sport you love, but even then you won't have enough time to get a job to pay for expenses, food and equipment. The NCAA makes around $6 million yearly, but still refuses to pay the athletes that make that money for them. Considering that college games are just as popular as the professional games, the NCAA and many other college require you to be in college for about 2 years before you can even think of going

Show More
Related
1448 Words | 6 Pages

Well, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary an amateur is “a person who does something poorly: a person who is not skillful at a job or other activity”. These athletes are far from an amateur by these standards. They are hand chosen from high school, given a scholarship worth thousands of dollars all because they don’t have any skills? If these athletes played so poorly than they wouldn’t be able to bring in the billions of dollars that they do annually and no college would pay so much money to bring them there. The college athletics departments have many of the same resources that pro teams do.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

I personlly think NCAA athletes should get paid, because they put a lot on the line to play college ball. Yea they might get paid in free education but you got to look on the other side how are they to support they self for personal needs like tooth paste, cloths, shoes, soap, and many more. What about the ones that go out of there home state and play. Their family many miles away so they can’t get to much support from them.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever thought that college players should be paid? I'm asking that question because college athletes are hard workers and should be diverse to be paid. College players put themselves at risk each game they play. College players also bring in a lot of money for the NCAA. College players devote most of their time to training.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be paid because they play in games where the atmosphere and the way of play are so similar to the way a professional games are played. Colleges and the NCAA don’t want to pay college athletes as the argue that the athletes play in an amateur Division I type of game compared to the way professionals play (Furth). The NCAA keeps arguing that colleges play amateur sports and this keeps them from paying the athletes what they’re suppose to. As NCAA calls the sport that the athletes play “amateur”,so they only get cheap scholarships.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore should college athletes get paid? Well if they do once they graduate they will live a good life. They have enough money to pay for their house bills or etc. But what if college athletes would actually get paid,but will it be fair if only the good ones get paid and the not so good ones not?

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

(“Crossfire: Hypocritical to not pay College Athletes”) So many of these schools are still helping out their athletes by improving the program they’re in by putting more funding into that program to benefit the future of that program as well as the current generation. So in a way college athletes are being selfish in wanting to benefit off of their playing while they are mostly receiving a free college education as well as better athletic facilities, uniforms, and other equipment used for a sport that they have earned for it. Some players would be satisfied with taking pride in the fact that they’re abilities as an athlete and a team allowed for the legacy of that generation to passed onto the future as they earned that money for the university. Another thing is the benefits they are receiving is great.

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

The debate whether college student athletes should be paid or not has been going on for the past half a century, however the argument has seen virtually no change but all the different views and opinions will help shape your opinion on the topic. Student athletes give one hundred percent of their effort to the sport they play and the college they play for. The universities and the National College Athletic Association receive millions of dollars because of these players, but the ones on the field, court, or track never see an dime. College athletes are painted out in various ways depending on the articles you read and the opinions of the author. The rules of the NCAA strictly state that college student athletes are not aloud to hire an agent,

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

Athletes dedicate their whole lives to being a part of a college team, and much time is sacrificed in order to participate. Although some people claim that paying college athletes would detract from the academic environment

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

I think that College athletes should get paid if the sport that they play makes the school at least fifty thousand dollars because the athletes need to pay off loans if they have to and they have to buy books for school, they also put their bodies on the line every game they play, the athletes are the main reason that the school even makes money, and good players would want to stay at the school longer and this will make the athletes more successful as they'll get used to the business side of sports. Not every player on a

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

They sacrifice their identity and their personalities to meet their college coach expectations to obtain a college scholarship. NCAA gives college athletes money for everything they need that is on college campuses, but what about the necessities outside of the campus. College athletes need money for everyday things, just like every other college student who work outside of college to maintain their everyday spending. That is why the NCAA should allow college athletes to take endorsement deals. Endorsement deals allow other companies to use someone name and fame to profit by making gear and apparels, just like the NCAA does.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

When people hear about if college athletes should get paid they would say no because they think the athletes would get paid millions of dollars. It is not like that, college athletes would not be paid that high they would only need to be paid so they can live a decent life. They have to balance their lives with school and their sports. College athletes should get paid because The NCCA is billion dollar business and the athletes don’t get any money, athletes spend more hours working for the sport than the average American, it helps athletes manage their money.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

College sports in America are massive in terms of popularity and coverage. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) have many sponsored division I sports including, basketball, baseball, American football, soccer, and many more. College athletes have been putting their health and time to the side with little to no financial security. The NCAA, while supposedly a non-profit organization, profits greatly from the sports with no compensation to the players. Most players spend north of 40 hours weekly in practices and games, which is as much as a full-time job, with their only benefits being a possible scholarship and boarding.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

If college athletes were paid, it would not be fair to the students who do not play sports and who work very hard to succeed. For example, if the athletes are paid, so should the students going to school to be lawyers, doctors, teachers, engineers, etc. The students who are going to school to have careers like that are going to help people with their future careers. No one should be paid to go to

Read More

More about Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document