ipl-logo

Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

538 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: An Argumentative statement on "college athletes should be paid

Argument: ‘It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.’ from Anderson. So why should college athletes be paid, since they are based on their reputation. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. For example before you go to college you will get scouted from the university during high school. Which is very difficult to earn a spot. So many people on the media always says that collegiate athletes should not be paid based on their reputation. If scholarships were taken out of the deal, and only salaries was given to athletes, then it would be more probably fair and affordable for the university, right? Wrong. Let’s say you was paid the highest offer for your team and next year you will have enough money to leave to a different university. They are student who have many access to a college education through their scholarship in sports, fees, and board and other allowable expenses. …show more content…

If these athletes deserve to get paid they should just do 1 year in college and draft to the NBA, people like Marvin Bradley did the same. Marvin Bagley went to Duke for one year he is a center on the basketball team. Did you know spending billions of more to pay players would only exacerbate a difficult financial situation for school that are already subsiding athletics. However a statistical found that the top college quarterback are worth more than 2 million annually to their schools. The lifestyle of college athletes remains restrained by NCAA rules established by every athletic programs. Full scholarship pay tuition and board but can fall short of the complete cost of going to school, by millions dollars annual at different

Show More
Related
1466 Words | 6 Pages

“Lest you think I exaggerate, look up the case of the two athletes at the University of Iowa who started a T-shirt screening business and were threatened with ineligibility by the N.C.A.A. because their website mentioned that they met because they were both — brace yourself — swimmers” (Rosenberg, 2017). Paying collegiate athletes would also help develop athletes better if they do stay longer instead of rushing to go pro and then failing to be something because the they were not for that type of exposure. Injury is another reason why they should get paid. No matter what sport you play, you’re always putting your life on the line when you play that sport. “Paying players could guarantee them a degree of financial security, and prevent some from leaving prematurely” (Labaton,

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

It’s not just colleges that get all the money, it’s the staff, and coaches. Most college coaches are paid very well, and are taken care of very well. So what is the problem of letting the student athletes get a little bit of money that they deserve. Last example is, NCAA basketball tournament now makes about $83 million more than it did in 1981 (Should College Athletes Be Paid). The NCAA basketball tournament is in March.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Besides, it is too hard to find a fair way to pay these athletes and they are practically being paid through the scholarships they receive. Which gives them a great education for free while playing the sport they grew up loving. Not to mention, there is something about watching young people play a game and try their hardest to be the best they can be, without having the influence of money to drive them. With all of these things considered, college athletes should not be paid to play college

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

The average professional athlete is paid $2.6 million per year. The average salary in the US is $50,500 a year. That is a difference of almost $2.5 million a year, and college athletes are getting none of that. College athletes should be paid because all the money made goes to coaches, the NCAA, and the broadcasters. In addition, what if a player gets injured how will they pay for it.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

In conclusion, college athletes should be paid because they bring in a ton of revenue for their schools while risking injury and yet are unable to afford the cost of living. The time that is put into the sport is the equivalent, if not more, than the time that is put into a full time job. Only thirty-three percent of students receive scholarships, most of them partial. Also, only one percent of all college athletes will play professional sports after their college tenure is served. The NCAA and Division One Colleges generate profits that do not trickle down to the athletes.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

Student-athletes should be allowed to get paid because the NCAA profits unfairly off of them. A source that shows this is “Why the public strongly supports paying college athletes.” by Nicole Craft. In the story it was talking about how the NCAA uses college athletes and it says, “we have seen over the last 20 years the explosion of the commercialization of college

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes staying pure to the game College athletes should not be paid to play, they should not be paid to play because it is something that they have to work for and in a way it would replace scholarships. College athletes already receive scholarships and they are meant to help them with their schooling and education, not to play sports. College athletes are also students and most of them will already receive scholarship from the college. The scholarship alone should be plenty of enough money for a student, to be paid more on top of that would just be ridiculous and unreasonable. For many young athlete, going to college to play the game you love is a once and a lifetime opportunity and privilege.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

That would not really be much of a problem at the bigger universities and bigger schools ,but would definitely be a problem for the smaller schools. With that, there could also be a problem with distributing all that money evenly with all athletes in all sports with paying them all equally (Tracy). Another thing is they are “Student Athlete”. Student first and then an athlete second. They are at college to study and get a degree.

Read More
1193 Words | 5 Pages

These athletes should not want to be paid. These athletes should want to play for the love of their sport not for how much money they would make because they are playing their sport. If people put money into the equation athletes should only be playing their sport to play their sport no further questions than that. Another reason is because they are still young adults that are irresponsible give these young adults potentially millions of dollars it wouldn’t end up well for them. If the NCAA were ever to pay these athletes they would have to do it equally to make it fair for everyone.

Read More
1358 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, college athletes work just as hard as the pros. College athletes have to play hard every time they are on the court because they are playing for a chance to enter in the pro leagues. Professional athletes play the same game as college players so why should they get paid and college players should not. College athletes also spend a lot of time on training and travel time for their sport plus they also have to focus on graduating. This takes up almost they whole schedule and leaves little time for a job, in which paying athletes for playing is a great way to help with that.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes like most employees work countless hours a week, miss many school days, and put themselves at risk for injury on a daily basis, but unlike regular employees they do not receive paychecks. NCAA players are compensated for their contribution to their universities through scholarships. It is true that most scholarships cover tuition, and room and board but many fail to realize the many other expenses a college athlete may face. These players are working for a multi billion dollar industry which is exploiting them for their talents and they should be paid fairly for their contribution.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

Colleges willing to pay for their players could attract talented athletes. Students may want to go out for a sport if they know they will be paid, which could also bring talent to the field or court. With new talent, teams could win more and earn more recognition. This would benefit the players, coach and

Read More

More about Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

Open Document