ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

565 Words3 Pages

One of the most controversial topics in society today is whether or not student athletes should be paid by their respective universities. Playing that sport is essentially a full time job, considering the time it consumes. These athletes are not able to get a job and therefore have a much harder time than normal students when it comes to producing revenue, this is why college athletes should be paid. Another driving factor is that big schools bring in hundreds of millions of dollars every year from sports, but only give out a few million dollars in scholarships. College athletes are some of the most worked individuals, yet are not compensated for their efforts or their financial contributions to the university, because of this student athletes in college should be paid. …show more content…

The NCAA being so forceful about preventing college athletes from being paid indicates to everybody that if this rule was not in place, players in fact would be paid. It makes more sense for these sort of rules to be established on a conference to conference level rather than one overarching, some say corrupt, organization making rules that try to play God. The best system is a system where each team is able to make decisions for themselves. All of the football and basketball conferences would be able to make their own rules on the payment of players. This would also get rid of the “everybody should be treated equal” mindset that this country has. The teams that are profitable to the university would receive more payment than the teams that are not. This means in most schools the football and basketball players would be

Show More
Related
358 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, the decision to start paying the athletes not only would create a even playing field that has typically been swayed toward the universities. Stipends are needed to control how much is allocated, but that itself will be the spark that is needed. This is important because the relationship between the NCAA and their athletes are like any other employer its employee; employer should pay the employee what they are worth, not just what they feel is equal. The NCAA has duplicated the structure that held many people down in the 1800’s - slavery. They earn the massive income as the laborers (athlete) settle for pennies.

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is the highest grossing and most profitable college program in the country. Despite the many adjustments, it still has not changed much over the past century. According to NCAA.org, the NCAA is a non-profit organization and their main source of income is generated from player performance. The organization accumulates approximately $1 billion a year, yet they don’t pay the athletes that generate the money for them. Many people believe that it is unfair to the players that they do not receive any income when they are what brings in the income.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine if when you were choosing your college decision you thought of which school was going to pay you the most for you to play there. How, would this change your opinion on the school of whether or not you would decide to go there. College athletes should not be paid to play for schools because being paid could affect their college decisions, athletic scholarships already pay for tuition and board, and allowing schools to pay players would eventually lead to top divisions creating a monopoly of talent at a high level. Being paid to play for a college could change an athlete’s decision on where he or she decides to spend their time in college at. If the NCAA allowed colleges to pay players to play it would drastically give high profile schools

Read More
1371 Words | 6 Pages

Most athletes are not mature enough to even have a pay because then it's basically like they are being paid to play. WIth the athletes that are immature about the money they would get paid would take away from the education part of school. with school relying on men basketball and football with some departments not making profit at all would cause some colleges to lower division not being able to offer any type of scholarship because with the school that pay students would get more enrollment mainly because athletes want to get paid and then athletes would not be playing for the right

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever thought that college players should be paid? I'm asking that question because college athletes are hard workers and should be diverse to be paid. College players put themselves at risk each game they play. College players also bring in a lot of money for the NCAA. College players devote most of their time to training.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes should be paid because they play in games where the atmosphere and the way of play are so similar to the way a professional games are played. Colleges and the NCAA don’t want to pay college athletes as the argue that the athletes play in an amateur Division I type of game compared to the way professionals play (Furth). The NCAA keeps arguing that colleges play amateur sports and this keeps them from paying the athletes what they’re suppose to. As NCAA calls the sport that the athletes play “amateur”,so they only get cheap scholarships.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Paying student athletes would help financial hardship and motivate students to stay in

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Does that revenue go to another sports organization who is exceeding? That is what took place with TAMU for a few years. The Aggies were dealt with as a have-not, sadly being a casualty of imbalance income distribution and rewarded power, tailoring them to switch conferences. Smaller universities that do not have the proper funds of athletics would cause populated universities to receive an even more increased pay. This would cause lower-end institutions to struggle, even more, resulting in a bad case of the haves and the

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
1281 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes spend hours a week practicing for their games; some people think the athletes should be paid, but they do not. College athletes practice and play their sport for at least two or three months; some sport seasons go even longer and the athletes aren’t paid for it. The NCAA (National College Athletic Association) makes millions a year so people think that the players should get a little of it. The athletes do it in hopes to go to the pros one day but if they do not it would be nice to have that money from playing in college. College athletes should be paid because they bring in large amounts of money for the NCAA, they put their future careers on the line every time they play, and it helps start financial awareness.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

it would only be fair to pay every athlete on campus equally. But it's not fair to pay the participants of those few revenue sports the same as the non revenue

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

With such small budgets teams cannot afford to pay student athletes. Although if player compensations were to go into effect and player were paid, the most successful and highest budgeted team would monopolize college athletics. A top tier SEC Division-1 football such as Alabama has a much greater budget than small school such as Memphis or UAB. Recruiting would become a bidding process that would result in students going to the school just for the money. The idea that college athletes should payed needs to be dismissed due to the

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document