ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

883 Words4 Pages

College athletes should receive a salary because College athletics bring in extreme amounts of revenue to universities. Through the athletes performance, labor, and image they bring in large sums of profit to these colleges therefore many believe they should be paid as seeing they are not being paid as of right now. This concept is argued about and causes some strong controversy between both sides those that support and those that oppose the concept. This controversy lies upon three main categories endorsements, salary, and the approach. This topic has become one of the main discussions in modern college athletics.
Universities are using an athletes image and making a profit off of it, meanwhile they aren’t paying the athletes for it. …show more content…

Athletes began noticing this and there soon were some investigations. Many people began looking into how much these programs are making and how much these players are missing out on, since they aren’t being paid for their performance which runs this industry. For example, “Alabama's Crimson Tide football program reported $103.9 million in revenue for 2016 and posted a $47 million profit”. Due to the NCAA rules players did not receive a dime of these millions. The millions come from the games, the jerseys, team apparel, and most importantly the athletes image. This possible and well deserved income could change the lifestyle of these athletes. They are expected to perform their best day in and day out but they aren’t receiving the right treatment to reach this capability. This statement from Shabazz Napier exemplifies the struggle these athletes go through and how an income would support them. “We do have hungry nights that we don’t have enough money …show more content…

Many are divided when speaking on the salaries of college athletes because many don't have an understanding on how athletes would be paid. Some concepts consist of salary caps, endorsement deals, and signing bonuses. The concept of salary caps is constructed similar to those of professional leagues such as the NBA and NFL. Teams would be given an overall salary cap, an example of this would be “In basketball, the cap would be $650,000. In football, it would be $3 million.” Now this isn’t an extraordinary amount, its not even that large of a sum if you compare it to what the michigan coach makes which is a grand 7 million. Therefore 3.65 million is a very tangible number to these multi-million dollar programs. With these possible caps some projected salaries would start off at 25,000 minimum per player. Players in the near future could also make endorsement deals with companies. This was a non negotiable with the NCAA for years but with some recent opposition there has been a break and some players received checks from EA sports for the use of their image and name in their games. This is a small step towards the payment of collegiate athletes but it is an undeniably significant one. Lastly the concept of signing bonuses came up in the pondering of how the payment of athletes could occur. The NCAA has been troubled with conflicts involving the use of the

Show More
Related
1433 Words | 6 Pages

NCAA athletes took the NCAA to court. Ed O’Bannon, a former NCAA athlete, led the charge for the student athletes. O’Bannon argued that the athletes are being taken advantage of because the schools make millions off of the players’ likeness, meaning the schools make money on selling a jersey, or bobble head of the players and the players deserve some of that money and it should be put into a trust fund for the player. Judge Claudia Wilkin decided the O’Bannon case and gave the athletes everything they wanted in 2014, but in a court of repeals the ruling was reversed and the college just had to pay for the full cost of attendance at the university and did not have to pay for the trust of each athlete (Nocera). This was a small step for college

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

Over 80% of the revenue comes from television and marketing rights fees. That means over 80% of the money comes from the moments the players show their skills and entertain their audience. Ken Reed, of the Huffington Post, wrote an article saying that the compensation for college athletes is not as simple as many people might think. Questions get raised such as, how should the wealth be divided? How will non-revenue sports be dealt with?

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Reasons Why or Why Not?” author Unknown goes over the NCAA vs. Alston ruling, which is when colleges were given the power to reward their athletes for their name, image, and likeness. They then explain why student athletes are not being paid by their schools, and what a name, image, and likeness agreement is. It is then written how student athlete scholarships actually work and what the difference is between a full versus a partial scholarship. They then list cons of paying college athletes, like how scholarships are the fairest form of compensation for them and how paying athletes diminishes the spirit of

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

According to the official NCAA website, 11 percent of the NCAA’s yearly revenue is off championships that student athletes participate in. However, 81% of the revenue comes off of television rights that televise sporting events, such as the Final Four. If the NCAA is going to make money off of these players playing in these events, then the NCAA needs to start paying them. For example, if you worked on a project in class, but you got no credit for it, then you would be irate.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

College tuition in average cost $48,440 each student with every college averaging around 3849 students the revenue for tuition alone is $186,445,560 per year. That amount is not including room and board which is $41,569,200 with the total being $228,014,760. Another argument about who should be paid more is that football and men’s basketball bring in more revenue for schools so those athletes should be paid more. This is not fair to those of other programs who are considered top athletes within their program so they should be considered equal to those of other programs. Some people say that the athletes are the ones who do the work so they should being paid not the coaches.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

With football and basketball being more of the dominant sports and making the most money, how much would athletes get paid and would it put the NCAA into debt. The NCAA generates nearly 11 billion dollars in revenue from college sports. That's more than the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League (sports money). The average salary for a NCAA coach is about 1 million dollars (sports money). University of Alabama football coach Nick Saban's contract in 2016 pays him over 7 million dollars a year.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

These student athletes deserve to be compensated for the work they do. Events such as March Madness bring in $1 billion dollars, but almost none go to the athletes. In a Forbes article, “Why The Public Strongly Supports Paying College Athletes”, sports attorney Luke Fedlam writes, “We have seen over the last 20 years the explosion in the commercialization of college sports. Check out the NCAA March Madness tournament. So much money is being made on student-athletes’ abilities”(Fedlam).

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

”The players are classified as students rather than athletes, so they do not receive the same legal protections as employees”(“College athletes should be paid for their participation”). This is a huge problem. Since student athletes are considered just students, colleges are not legally obligated to pay the athletes for their work or cover any expenses if they get injured while playing their sport. In the summer of 2021 The NCAA's rule change allowed college athletes to sign paid endorsement deals so student-athletes could profit from their own names, images, and likenesses”(“college athletes should be paid for their participation”). it wasn't until 2021 that students could make money for their advertising so they were getting no compensation and some players that are not as well known still get no money.

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

Paying college athletes has been a trending topic around the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Universities should not allow players to receive compensation for their performances. When money is involved many problems can arise. There are many different kinds of sports within a university; thus causing, many questions to develop. For example, will all sport athletes get paid and will some athletes get paid more than other?

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the years, Division I college athletes have been putting incredible amounts of blood, sweat, tears, and time into their respective sports. These athletes, most of whom have played their sport since they were children, have dedicated huge amounts of their lives to build their talent that they showcase to the entire nation. Despite this hard work, most athletes still play for the love of the game, college sports have been transformed into an industry or business to promote or profit the schools that they play for. Players are somewhat compensated by receiving full rides to schools, however the NCAA makes significantly more than the average amount of money they provide the athletes for a full ride and many believe they should be paid more along with their scholarships. With a popularized understanding of the way NCAA sports function in recent years, the question arises: Should college athletes be paid for playing?

Read More
1167 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the past few years, countless arguments have been made regarding if college athletes should get paid. Dismissing the Name, Image, and Likeness deal (NIL) and how athletes receive compensation for that matter, they do not obtain money like a salary. Despite the fact that the athletes are the ones who agree to continue their sport at an advanced level with the knowledge of no pay, they should at least gain a slight amount of income before, during, and after their season. These athletes play for the NCAA, National College Athletic Association, and they draw in a great deal of revenue, but do not acquire the same in return along with their effort, drive, and enthusiasm. Being a college athlete is predominantly a full-time job, so if

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

Many people know or have heard about college coaches and college programs getting a lot of money after each game, in 2019 the NCAA total athletic revenue among all of the athletic departments was 18.9 billion dollars. In 2020 U.S. Congressman Mark Walker set out a bill about college athletes getting paid for their names, images, and likeness and he wished that it would be voted on in 2020 and that in 2021 it might go into effect. In the article “NCAA clears the way for athletes to profit from names, images and likenesses” Mark Walker States “ college athletes should get profit off of their names and image and likenesses because athletic programs wouldn’t have to pay so much to them and he also states that the program they play for should pay them 1,000 dollars each month to keep the players interest high. Given this evidence, it can be seen that letting college players get paid off of their names and image and likenesses would benefit them because they wouldn’t have to worry about getting another job or struggle with money problems if the NCAA would pay them 1,000 dollars each month and that could also help the program out because they wouldn’t have to worry about paying them after each game. This Proves my claim because the NCAA is paid around 18.9 billion dollars each year from the athletic department and none of that goes to the athletes that they have put their bodies on the line for the program each game and each practice and that’s unfair to them because they work so hard outside of practice and games they don’t want to worry about not having money, so when Mark Walker said that the NCAA should pay the athletes 1,000 dollars each month he is right.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

This can be especially found because the NCAA is making money off of the college player’s likeness (Forbes). Many colleges sell college athletes’ jerseys and merchandise revolving around the team or a certain athlete, yet the athletes still do not receive any money at all. Simply, without the athletes the NCAA would be nothing, as well as college’s athletic teams. For this reason alone, the athletes should be compensated fairly.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The coaches who are coaching these athletes make $100,000 per year four times what the athletes scholarships are worth. These coaches also receive bonuses for making it to the playoffs, winning championships, or breaking school records. The NCAA executives are making millions per year, and the students cannot even accept $50 for signing a autograph. The NCAA and the coaches are making a lot of money and becoming wealthier everyday off of the athletes that are playing for them .On the other hand some people say that college athletes should not get paid for their playing.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

According to Cork Gaines, “there are now 20 schools that make at least $100 million in sports”. This fact is supported by Figure C (Revenue* of college football teams in 2014 (in million U.S.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document