Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysisi of plato
Socrates disertations
Socrates disertations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysisi of plato
Socrates disertations
Socrates disertations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Out of the three quotes, Socrates quote, best outlines my philosophy. In the words of Socrates, “An individual must do what his city or country demands of him or he must change their view of what is just.” This quote is basically saying that we have to follow what the majority of society believes, or change the view of society to what our definition of “just” is. Slavery is a great example because at one point it was accepted by the majority of society. Then much of society started to rebel against the idea, and realized that owning another human being was wrong.
Socrates 's second argument “The Analogy between the State and One 's Parents”, in my opinion, is flawed and could be improved. The first chapter of our textbook reads: “Our parents made our lives possible—they brought us into being, raised us, and educated us. We are therefore obligated to respect and obey them. The state also makes our lives possible, by providing a social environment that nurtures and sustains us. So we have a similar obligation to respect and obey the state.”
In the beginning of book VI, Socrates makes a point by saying that philosophers have always been able to see things as they are versus people who see things as they vary and so he asks, who should rule? (484b) Socrates then launches into how philosophers are the ones who love the truth and want nothing and will not stand for anything, but the truth. (485c) It is because of that they should rule and so Socrates is asking for a philosopher-king who will seek nothing but the truth through knowledge and wisdom. This is the most important and boldest claim Plato makes in the defense of philosophy.
In Plato's Gorgias, it is apparent that Socrates has no desire to be a good statesman as it is defined in the eyes of the Athenians. His calculation is that Athenian rhetoricians place no reliance on facts or truth, nor are these their aim. Instead, they rely on the illusion of knowledge, and this morally weakens both themselves and their audiences. It is clear however, that if he wishes, Socrates is able to match most or all of the other statesmen in Athens, as is clearly indicated by his very eloquent speech which ends the dialogue. Additionally, under his own definition of a good statesman, it is evident that Socrates is more than qualified.
World War I was one of the worst wars humankind has ever seen. World War I was a war fought in Europe between Germany, Russia, France, Great Britain,the United States,and many others. However,the cause of WWI is still unknown, but a few things that could have started one of the biggest wars anyone has ever seen are the alliance system,militarism, and the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The Alliance System was an underlying cause of World War I because of the Triple Alliance that consisted of;Germany,Austria-Hungary,and Italy. The Triple Entente formed between France,Britain,and Russia,but a problem with this alliance was that France and Britain were enemies but since they both feared germany they came together
The next is moderation, which was “a certain kind of order and mastery of … pleasure and desires ”. To describe it well to Glaucon, Socrates used the phrase “stronger than himself”. He explained that moderation was “used when that which [was] better by nature [was] master over that which [was] worse”. What he meant by that was men with this virtue could control the things that were bad and would not let these things to control their body and soul. Socrates then told Glaucon to look at their “young city” and he could find moderation.
It’s what motivates people to stay persistent in accomplishing their goals. Socrates was an incredibly determined person. His single goal in life was to learn and to question others, a task he claimed was given to him by the gods, and in this goal, he succeeded tremendously. Socrates was endlessly determined to question as many people as possible, and even more so determined in aiding the questionee to achieve non biased logic in their thinking, while showing that what the claim to know, they do not really. For example, when Socrates was questioning Euthyphro about how he concluded what’s pious and what’s not, he kept asking what Euthyphro meant meant by his responses: “So you did not answer my question, you surprising man” (Euthyphro 8a).
Socrates argument is: Everyone knows bad things, in so far as they are bad, are harmful. So, to want something you believe to be bad as such, involves wanting to be harmed. But no one wants to be harmed. Therefore, no one wants bad things, in-so-far as they are bad, as such. To effectively refute this argument, one could simply provide a counter example to one or more of Socrates’ premises.
Throughout the nation today, some of the most divisive disagreements that arise often center around the push for state rights as opposed to an expansion of an already big government. Under the current Trump administration, the debate over how much power each side should have is being seen today. On one hand, California, home to many undocumented immigrants, is pushing for sanctuary laws, which can be seen argued through natural law. While on the other hand, the federal government argues they have all the power to enforce current immigration statutes, which can be better discussed in a positive law point of view. With respect to the views of past philosophers, the thinkers who explored more of a positive law path have a stronger argument for
Was Socrates right to say he would stay in Athens no matter the consequences, or should he have fled Athens to avoid death? Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what because first, he believed he was sent to Athens or “placed in Athens” for a specific reason and he also believed that even though the Athenians found him as a threat and annoying, he believed that it helped them. Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what the consequences were because he believed that he was placed or in Athens for a reason. This quote from “The Apology” is an example to prove that he was placed in Athens for a reason. “Because if I tell you that doing that would mean disobeying the god, and so I can’t keep quiet,
Socrates started his life as an average Athen citizen. His parents worked, making an honest living. But as Socrates grew up, he began to realize that his mind questioned things and wondered how come no one else questioned the same things or at least think about the answers to the questions that were not answered. So, as his mind kept wandering, he began to acknowledge the questions that were not answered and sought for those answers. He ended up believing and teaching things to other people, whether it went against the way the Athen government or not, he still continued his work.
Socrates argues that the mind has three parts because the state has three parts that mind their own business and doo what is best for the state. The aspect is reasoning which is associated with the rulers of the state whom Socrates here calls them governors (441a) he associates reasoning with rulers because they have knowledge and, another aspect is appetite which is associated with workers because they have desires, they feel hunger , thirsty and have sexual desires Socrates says this because workers can have lots of money be rich and participate in activities that rulers and auxiliaries are forbidden from that can satisfy their appetite. Furthermore, the third aspect is spirit, which is associated with the auxiliaries because auxiliaries
In an attempt to define the idea of justice in The Republic, Socrates uses an inductive argument from analogy to draw parallels between a just man and a just city. Using a disjunctive syllogism method of deduction, Socrates distinguishes the elements of the soul to show that a just man is a reflection of a just city. While I agree to the distinct elements of the soul, I find Socrates’ claim that a just man is a reflection of a just city objectionable. To establish my view, I will start with a reconstruction of Socrates’ premises by providing the explanation the argument was built on. Next, I will develop my objection to his premises and consider a response that Socrates might provide for my point.
Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.
Although many people may be against two years of military for the young, I am all in for military service for the young for freedom, to help others and yourself, and strength. If we do not serve the military while we are young, we will not get nowhere in life. First, we should have to have military services at a young age for two years for freedom. Some may think we have all the freedom we need in our “free country”, but you can not just say you want something big and expect to have it, you have to work for what you want, like you should work for your freedom.