ipl-logo

Ancient Rome's Social Hierarchy

1146 Words5 Pages

In ancient Rome, the Romans had a social hierarchy that was way more strict than what we may consider our social hierarchy today. A social hierarchy is an order of social class, with producers at the bottom. The Roman social hierarchy consisted of four positions that a person could be in. The most powerful position that a person could acquire would be the position of emperor. The emperor would be the ruler of Rome, have the best clothes, and would be very wealthy. The next position would be the patricians. The patricians were ranked just below the emperor and were what we would consider an aristocrat or a noble. Someone who had wealth and very high social standing. Next, we have the plebeians who were what we would consider the working class. …show more content…

The emperor, being the ruler of all Rome, had all power and freedom anyone could have. He would snap his fingers and people would serve him hand and foot, or he could go to the villa and do what he pleased. According to the article, Ancient Roman Role Sheets, “They stayed at the best villas, ate the finest food and dressed in only the most magnificent clothes. Life was luxurious, extravagant and indulgent-- the emperor’s family could spend their days enjoying their favorite pastimes, like music, poetry, hunting and horse racing.” This tells us that the emperor had lots of freedom and power to do what he wanted and to have what he pleased. While on the other hand, the slaves were the exact opposite, they had no freedom whatsoever. The slaves were beaten and tortured and no one would lift a finger to help them. According to the article, Ancient Roman Roll Sheets, “All slaves and their families were the property of their owners, who could sell or rent them out at anytime. Their lives were harsh. Slaves were often whipped, branded or cruelly mistreated.” This tells us that the slaves were owned as and looked at as property and not human beings. Slavs had no say in what happened to them and had no freedom. The emperor and the salve are extremely different in this aspect. The emperor had all the freedom he could want. The slaves had no freedom and were told what to do, opposed to the …show more content…

The emperor, being the most powerful man, could spend the day doing what he pleased and not have anyone question him. According the article, Ancient Roman Roll Sheets, “ Life was luxurious, extravagant and indulgent-- the emperor's family could spend their days enjoying their favorite pastimes, like music, poetry, hunting and horse racing.” This tells us that the emperor and his family could do what they pleased and no one was the position to tell him otherwise. On the other hand, the slaves were told what to do and they were in no position to contradicted their masters. According to the article, Slavery in the Roman Empire, “...force them to work in such jobs as: mining for precious metals; building roads and bridges; and as executioners... The slaves that were profitable to their owners did jobs like farming and unskilled labor (i.e. digging, moving), and skilled labor (i.e. carpentry, weaving).” This tells us that the slaves were doing work that their masters assigned to them, whether it was skilled or not. These slaves had jobs and no free time. The emperor and slave are different in this area because they are both completely opposite. Like salt and pepper. The emperor had freedom to do what he wanted and no one could tell him different, while the slave was told what to do and they had no other

Show More
Related
2020 Words | 9 Pages

This demonstrates how their power had no limits on how far they could go on treating someone badly, especially their slaves. They both take advantage of their power to get what they want, and to make someone’s life

Read More
1595 Words | 7 Pages

So when the time came for a slave (when allowed) to buy himself or his family out, they were faced with the hard truth, as the prices to their freedom were nearly impossible to obtain. So by this period, slaves were experiencing even further constrains, and their freedom was still very limited; these conditions resembled much of the life that slaves experienced decades ago, and that Berlin had described. In which slaves who had the skills could find ways to make use of, and profit from their talents, and also have the chance to improve even if a little their quality of

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Slaves served a variety of functions. They are farmers, miners, domestic servants, entertainers and even teachers…unlike slaves of Greece, a Roman slave lived in a unique society: he could earn or buy his freedom…and enjoy the benefits of citizenship, gaining wealth and power.” This pushed the Roman Republic's democracy farther and made it more open to anyone. However, “The most fundamental of all rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

“The slaves were clothed, fed, and better off under masters

Read More
1388 Words | 6 Pages

There is a very general similarity in this however; in both sides, slaves were not free and they had to obey their masters and work. Document 9 outlines observations by Hans Sloan concerning punishment of slaves on the island of Barbados. The punishments were very cruel, ranging from whippings for the smallest offenses to burning alive for

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

In this manner, the slave is depicted in its rightful place as a servant to slave masters and in fact enjoys more freedom than most people. Fitzhugh is not alone in his unusual justification of slavery.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

According to PBS, slavery played an important role in the Roman Society. Most slaves during the Roman Empire were foreigners and, unlike in modern times, Roman slavery was not based on race (“The Roman Empire in the First Century: Slaves & Freemen”). The life of a slave was quiet harsh. They were often whipped, branded or maltreated. Their masters could easily kill them for any reason, and would not get punished for it (“The Roman Empire in the First Century: Slaves & Freemen”).

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Compare the extent to which Mid Republican Rome (264BC-133BC) and the Qin and Han Chinese Dynasties were ‘Slave Societies’? A system in which the elite of that society relied primarily on slave labour to extract a surplus, and in which slave ownership had spread beyond a narrow elite, can be identified a s a legitimate slave society. That is; a kind of society that is decisively dependent on the institution of slavery, in that in the absence of slavery, the society would be markedly different. Mid-Republican Rome meets these criteria, the role of slavery in economic life, and the size of the slave population, while less significant when compared to later periods; was immense.

Read More
1854 Words | 8 Pages

The subjugation of indentured servants to their masters was nearly identical to that of slaves under early colonial law, however the rights held by both groups of unfree laborers differs

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

One of the more well-known and documented acts of political violence started in the colonial era when “Nathaniel Bacon and a sizable number of Virginians rose up in armed rebellion against the royal governor of the colony in 1676.” (Britanica) It was the result of Bacon and the then Gov. Berkeley having two different viewpoints about Indians and colony expansion. Berkeley did not want to remove the Indians for fear of war with the Indians as well as trade being interrupted. Berkeley eventually “launched military expeditions against Bacon” (Britanica) and his colonialists.

Read More
1359 Words | 6 Pages

Life in Nazi Concentration Camps No food. Crammed with hundreds of people in the same room. Following orders exactly to stay alive or not be beaten. Prisoners in Nazi Concentration Camps had to survive these horrific conditions for years. The works, Night, by Elie Wiesel, Life in a Nazi Concentration Camp, by Don Nardo, and "Auschwitz Concentration Camp", by Franciszek Piper, describe the conditions of these camps from multiple survivors ' viewpoints.

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

No Roman citizens could be sentenced to die on the cross. Roman women could not engage in any important business decisions without the agreement of their parents, husbands, or guardians. Any Roman citizen had an absolute power over their slaves; and no Roman citizen could legally be held as slaves. According to the book The Romans- From Village to

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

In 8th Century Greece the free citizens refused to work in any job that was considered beneath them, leaving many job openings to slaves. For example, working as a secretary, accountant, banker or any subsidiary position in business. In 2nd Century Rome many slaves were sent to work

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Labor saving technological advances which may have to served to augment the economic and overall growth of the empire did not occur secondary to the availability of slave labor (Kamm, 2009). This further served to stifle potential growth as technology would have served to reduce overhead, thereby opening business capital for expansion or investment (Fenner, n.d.). Moreover, with slave labor, Romans never sought to improve production techniques, develop efficient transportation technologies or discover new sources of energy, all of which may have provided for exponential economic growth (Fenner, n.d.). Additionally, according to Fenner (n.d.), for slaves in particular there existed little incentive for personal growth and development as slave laborers did not keep the “fruits of their

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

Kindness was rarely shown to slaves, but deliberate cruelty was also frowned upon (Roman Empire). For example, a slave could choose their partner and live with them on their master’s property, but their marriage held no legal status and their children would be born into slavery (Roman Empire). Slaves were subject to considerable mistreatment, but their punishments were downright ruthless (Roman Empire). A typical punishment consisted of whippings, the breaking of bones and joints, and brandings (Roman Empire). A thief, liar, or runaway would often be branded across their forehead (Roman Empire).

Read More

More about Ancient Rome's Social Hierarchy

Related Topics

Open Document