The essay “The Church and Prejudice” written by Frederick Douglass, and the essay “Ending His Fast” written by Cesar Chavez both had major impacts on the people of their time and on ones for many years to come. Types of speeches and essays like these helped spread awareness and led to the eventual change in the stance of modern day churches. They both talk about forms of civil rights for the minorities from the church, but they do differ on the subject of different ethnicities and life factors that were written about. Douglass and Chavez wrote these articles to spread awareness about the treatment of the church towards the minorities. The Mexicans wanted to be treated equally, and they wanted help as though they were the majority. They didn’t …show more content…
The essay written by Chavez talks about how it seems as though the Church wants to keep “farm workers in virtual enslavement,”. The article named “Ending His Fast” is to represent the protests that Chavez was included in to try to gain help and rights for the Mexican-Americans. Douglass’ article talks about the struggle of African Americans and how the church treats them wrongly through verbal abuse and also physical abuse. At this time there were almost no ways for people to protest against the treatment against African Americans because slavery was still a common occurrence at this time. This differs with Chavez’s article where they protested down the streets. This form of protest would not occur for many years to come with African Americans. The Church described in the essay that Douglass wrote was more violent and harsh, whereas The Catholic Church in Chavez’s essay was more subtle about their treatment. The Catholic Church in Chavez’s states that “often the money is spent for food baskets for the needy instead of for effective action to eradicate the cause of poverty,”. They just avoided answering the claims against them. The Church in Douglass’ essay outwardly beat them, and while doing this used the Bible as an excuse for their