ipl-logo

Andrew Carnegie Surplus Wealth Summary

790 Words4 Pages

Andrew Carnegie once raised the question of how to distribute wealth properly. He raised the argument on whether or not it was fair for so few to have so much and keep it away from the people who have so little. He asked this question when he realized that there are few people that are born into wealth and do nothing to earn it while there are people who live in poverty who work everyday just to keep their families alive. Carnegie explained how there were two types of wealth, there is comfort wealth and surplus wealth. Surplus wealth was an extreme unnecessary wealth that was never used to provide for family but instead for luxury items.Comfort wealth was explained as an amount of wealth that allowed them to live comfortably without the luxury …show more content…

Each mode was found to have an issue on how the use of the money could be monitored and not abused. Both the first and second mode were harder to monitor, the first didn’t take care of the issue with surplus wealth, and the second modes issue was that the wealth was not always used as the person who passed wished. Which left the third mode as the best option possible, the third mode ensured that the wealthy would donate to the public in order to avoid high taxes. Carnegie then had to decide how much the tax would be, and he decided that the amount that would be taxed would depend on the amount of money you had. Since the other two decisions had many faults the third was put into motion.

Andrew Carnegie wanted to create a capitalist system, which involved the lower class working underneath of the wealthy, who would then give their surplus of wealth to society The duty of the wealthy is to set an example of modesty among the wealthy, to provide for the needs of those that depend on him and to lend money to his fellow man to give back to the community. The man of wealths duties as carnegie explained in paragraph nine is to “provide the poor a trustee and a sole agent that provides them with wisdom experience and doing for them better than they would do or could do for themselves.” ( Carnegie, paragraph nine). THis system would give the wealthy many responsibilities, but Carnegie believed it was their duty to help others when they were unable to help

Show More
Related
711 Words | 3 Pages

Justification of this is seen in Document 3, as Andrew Carnegie writes, “The problem of our age is the proper administration of wealth so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in harmony.” Surely, a manipulative man would not believe in such fair distribution of wealth. Carnegie is also famous for large charitable donations, meaning his business methods were not enacted solely for his own benefit. This statement highlights Carnegie’s compassionate side and proves that he is not completely a “robber baron.” Similarly to Carnegie, Rockefeller’s compassionate side is also portrayed in Document 7.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Robber barons, specifically Andrew Carnegie, an industrialist and John D. Rockefeller, a philanthropist, were the chosen, elite members of society according to the doctrine of Social Darwinism. Darwinism is when evolution occurs and the strongest organisms of an ecosystem survive and reproduce to outnumber the weaker, less fit organisms of an ecosystem. Similarly Social Darwinism follows the same concept, but in a capitalist sense of thought. Those who were able to exploit the Gilded Age’s laissez faire economy to their own benefit, like the robber barons Andrew Carnegie of Carnegie Steel and J. D. Rockefeller of Standard Oil, were the fittest members of society because they were able to survive in the grueling and ruthless free economy. By usurping all of the fresh yet unfit immigrants that were flowing into the States due to the rise of urbanization, these two men integrated these easily-manipulated people into their factories to augment their profits.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The captains of industry believed that the poor people were inferior to the rich people. The rich were superior because they had “wisdom, experience, and the ability to administer”. The duty of a rich person was to help out a poor person which was what was said in the Gospel of Wealth. The Gospel of Wealth is about how the rich person's responsibility is philanthropy. Carnegie believes in charity work so he would donate to libraries, and universities and schools and etc.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Likewise, many wealthy people, including big business leaders, came to realize that it was their role in society was to give back. Due to all the negative responses, people such as Andrew Carnegie were huge philanthropists . They stated that because they were wealthy and were better inclined than most, they should be willing to help those at the bottom. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, explicitly stated how the wealthy have a moral obligation to give back (Outside Evidence). Other major responses to changes and the impact of big business were responses from the government.

Read More
1200 Words | 5 Pages

449) In similarity in the ideas of enrichment of land Andrew Carnegie believed that the wealthy were responsible for the public good through decisive disbursement of their riches whether it be through art, parks, or public institutions and that the act of indiscriminate charity was a crutch for society, and that society mustn't stand still or move backwards if it is meant to thrive. Giving back to society through the act of erecting institutes of knowledge was Andrew Carnegies form of wealth and is shown in his use of hyperbolic rhetoric. While building public buildings, libraries and institutions was a form of charity in itself. Mr. Carnegie's goal was to offer the people a place where they could help themselves, and in the process of their growth become great within themselves, so that those people who rose through these public institutions given by him, could then offer in return their part to society instead of being the dreg of society and becoming a

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

There had to be a way to keep the industry growing, with the needs for education, as well as materials for farming and for the use of new inventions in technology. The captains of industry were very capable in providing for these needs. In Document C, Wealth, Andrew Carnegie describes what the man of wealth was responsible for: “To produce the most beneficial results for the community- Bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves.” The conditions of the lower class at the time gave these men a leading role for priorities, which they were successful with.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

This caused unrest among the populace (Brinkley 477). In contrast, the wealthy viewed industrialization very positively (Brinkley 472-473). Andrew Carnegie, one of these millionaires, had a singular view on wealth, and his philosophy both stemmed from and influenced his actions during his life. Carnegie’s view of rampant capitalism and the class separation it caused was radically different from most the population.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who help themselves. It provides part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give to those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise. (Andrew Carnegie) In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” by Andrew Carnegie he gives his vision on how the gap between rich and poor could be closed. He argued that if people with incredible amounts of wealth were forced or were opportunistic about giving away huge percentages of their wealth to charity.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

If you were the richest person in the world what would you accomplish with all the money you had? Andrew Carnegie, an American Captain of Industry By far off the greatest profitable businessman during his age, Carnegie left his mark on industry, and ordinarily greatly impacted the expansion of business enterprise in America. Essentially, Carnegie rose from poverty to become one of the most influential, industrial men in history by single-handedly building the American steel industry. Andrew Carnegie was famously known for being a hero because he would provide plenty to the poor.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

One of the many Gospel of Wealth advocates was Andrew Carnegie, 1835-1919, who was an industrialist who emigrated from Scotland to American in 1848 (Wall, ANBO). Carnegie’s “Wealth” written in 1889

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

He believed that if the wealthy don't give back some of their profits to the community, they are living a dishonorable life, and although I didn't necessarily agree with this radical viewpoint at first, I now am a firm believer in Carnegie's argument about wealth.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

As outlined in chapter 10 of the course text, inequality in housing and wealth is a major problem. The United States is described to be the most unequal countries in the western hemisphere. But with the inequalities when it comes to wealth, the United States is one of the richest countries in the world. Wealth is the sum total of a person’s assets. These assets include, cash in the bank and value of all properties, not only land but houses, cars, stocks, and bonds, and retirements savings.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie could have let his employees keep their wages and worry about donations later. Taking money away to invest it somewhere else is not helping, because the people

Read More

More about Andrew Carnegie Surplus Wealth Summary

Related Topics

Open Document