ipl-logo

Animal Bill Of Rights Essay

1225 Words5 Pages

Animal Bill of Rights Draft #2

The bill of rights is the humanization and validation of what the true American should be able to do to flourish in the United States. Ever since the beginning of this blossoming country we have struggled to identify the extent we are willing to push our morals concerning the human being. Western civilizations such as America has been striving to push this level of morality to animals, and even went so far to create the animal bill of rights. This bill of rights will protect animals from everyday things such as being used as farmhands, companion animals, and lab testing. The idea that animals should be considered to be on the same level as humans and have strict protection laws is absolutely absurd. In history …show more content…

Animals help us with many other aspects of life, and have since way back when. Cows help keep fertilized land, lambs provide us with wool, and horses provide us with transportation and sport. The animal bill of rights prevents these animals from being used in our society, thus leading to the destruction of mankind. If we were to stop using these animals to our benefit, we won’t be the only ones suffering. Cows will be unable to stay alive due to predators, domesticated pigs will soon die off from years of being babied by humans, and cats will eventually take over the human ratio by how frequently they reproduce. We need to think of the consequences before we go out and decide that every living thing should have the same rights. These animals need us, they really do. They have for so long been tended to and by humans, we have provided them with shelter and food, and in return, they provided meat and fur, and even companionship. Take example my cat, Milo, who while he is an amazing pet who provides me with companionship and love, still heavily relies on me to provide him with safety and a home. If this bill goes into place, and I have to put Milo on the street, he wouldn’t be able to survive. We help each other out, and they need us no matter how you look at it. If this bill of rights is enacted we are left with useless animals that have no purpose, essentially. They will contribute nothing to society and eventually become way too

Show More
Related
155 Words | 1 Pages

It is basically survival of the fittest. Giving animal’s rights should be necessary only if they are being abused. For example, forcing dogs to fight other dogs till one is dead. If the animals are killed for our basic human needs than it should not be wrong. I agree with Bob Stevens in his letter to Rifkins when he mentions the fact that pigs would get toys even though there are human beings in the world who do not have such things.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Animals have always played a pivotal role in societies throughout the past. Some communities praise animals, while others use them as a symbol of wealth, and some sectors own animals merely as companions. Throughout the article “The Case Against Pets” Francione and Charlton (2015) argue that animals must not be property, and consequently need to gain basic animal rights. As law professors at Rutgers University, and publishers of a book about animal rights, the author’s viewpoints and research are held credible. Nevertheless, despite their arguments being supported by validated and reliable evidence, both authors are biased towards their viewpoints.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

This law would hinder medical research. There won't be that much of an impact if some animals were to get a bill of rights. In the film blackfish it showed how the whales get frustrated of being in a pool their whole lives, that's why they sometimes attack the trainers at Seaworld. Studies done by Rifkin showed that apes show the skills necessary to learn sign language. Some animals are need of a bill of rights because there's people that have domesticated animals and all they do is mistreat and abuse them.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Many Americans blindly believe that animals deserve the same rights as humans, but little do they know about the differences between the welfare of animals and the rights of animals. In the article A Change of Heart about Animals, Jeremy Rifkin cleverly uses certain negative words in order to convince the readers that animals need to be given same rights as humans, and if not more. Research has shown that non-human animals have the ability to “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love” (Rifkin 33). Animals may be able to feel emotions, however this does not necessarily mean that they are able to understand what having rights mean. While humans must accept their moral responsibility to properly care for animals,

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Bill of Rights for Animals Animals may not reason, talk but they can forsure suffer. In the articles, “A Change of Heart About Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin “Hooked on a Myth,” by Victoria Braithwaite, both authors attempt to persuade us that we should enforce a bill of rights for animals. Therefore, the human race have to be obligated to not pass those limits for animals and their rights, because animals are vulnerable and defenseless. They are so similar to us, humans, so shouldn't they be treated with the same rights we have? Why do they have to be discriminated because their called animals?

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

Only 38% of Americans strongly believe that an animal’s right of living is just as important as a person ’s right to live free from suffering. People will claim that animal abuse is morally wrong, yet when it comes to people’s so called needs, some of these same people will turn the whole situation around. For example, when we think of animals, a dog or cat suddenly comes to mind, but what about the rats and possums the people despise so much that they kill them? Or what about the pigs, sheep, and cows?

Read More
1401 Words | 6 Pages

Animals carry an important role throughout human lives every day. Humans look to animals for numerous things such as: pets, a means of production, food, entertainment, experimental means, etc. Many animals carry human like traits, which raises many arguments and different positions on the subject of whether animals deserve rights while others feel that animals are simply animals, but may have certain interests that humans are obligated to respect. The issue is that many people confuse the terms animal rights and animal welfare when there is a fundamental difference between the two that revolves around the rights that humans have to use animals. There are many animal rights organizations including but not limited to: Best Friend’s Animal Society, The Humane Society of the United States, and the largest animal’s rights movement, People for Ethical

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

When you think of animals you always think about how much you distaste them or how cute they looked in a video you saw on Youtube. You never would think about the mistreatment animals face whether it is in their own environment or in a laboratory. Some people refuse to acknowledge the mistreatment of animals, but that does not make the problem go away. That is why animals need something to protect them from the unjust they face. Animals need a Bill of Rights to protect them from neglect, unnecessary experiments and humiliation, and have a right to live freely in their natural habitat.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

As a society there should be a continuation of proceeding to develop new laws. Animals have rights that are not being protected or considered when they are not given the chance to live without suffering or harm. Additionally animal rights are violated when they are used as products for experimentation. Animal experimentations

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Bill of Rights Is it moral for animals to be victims of abuse? The Animal Legal Defense Fund has created an Animal Bill of Rights petition to the United States Congress. The Animal Bill of Rights includes the following rights: the right of animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse, the right of laboratory animals not to be used in cruel or unnecessary experiments, the right of companion animals to a healthy diet, protective shelter and adequate medical care, the right of wildlife to a natural habitat, ecologically sufficient to a normal existence and a self-sustaining population, the right of farmed animals to an environment that satisfies their basic physical and psychological needs, and finally the right of animals to have their interest represented in court and safeguarded by the law of the land (Animal Bill of Rights). Animals should have

Read More
1387 Words | 6 Pages

What sets animals aside from humans is that animals are not capable of intellectual capacity such that they lack the ability of intrinsic value and moral autonomy. Humans have the right to treat animals as objects as humans hold the position of a higher hierarchy in all organisms. Humans can treat animals as objects so long as they are not treated as a means of a tool. If a human being were to inflict unnecessary harm to an animal, it would reflect on the human’s character and create the ability for the human to inflict harm on its species. [Humans have a duty and responsibility to care for others whether it being, other people, non-humans, the environment or future generations.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

Animals in the wild, much like humans, do not care about the feelings of their prey or other animals in general. The dictionary definition of animal rights are rights believed to belong to animals to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. I do not believe animals should have their own Bill of Rights because they are an important factor to the human species in the use of food, medical research, and many other things important to the human species that cannot be found elsewhere. Giving animal rights goes against the human culture. What would America be without mouthwatering hamburgers?

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

An immense bond is created between a human being and an animal. I believe that a bill of rights for animals would only suit some animals, but would be unnecessary for others to an extent. “Animals have the right to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse.” This is a proposed Animal Bill of Rights. To me it's obvious that this is a necessary right.

Read More
1561 Words | 7 Pages

Mostly, animal rights activists think that animal rights is grounded in rejecting speciesism and knowing that animals have the capacity of suffering. Animal Communities The Quran portrays that animals shape communities, similarly as human beings do: "There isn 't an animal which lives on the planet, nor a creature which flies on its wings, however they frame groups/communities like you. We have omitted nothing from the Book, and they will all gather to their God at the end" (Quran

Read More
711 Words | 3 Pages

On the other hand there are some people who believe animals should not have basic human rights. Perhaps they don 't deserve it because animals don 't know right from wrong when their natural instinct is to survive. You can 't punish a animal for killing another animal the way you can punish a human for murder. Humans understand right from wrong. Giving animals basic human rights is also not a good idea because giving animals human rights would mean not being able to test on animals.

Read More

More about Animal Bill Of Rights Essay

Related Topics

Open Document