Animal Farm Argument

874 Words4 Pages

Literatures that are rich in contexts are those that use figurative languages smartly. George Orwell in his novel “Animal Farm” symbolizes the rise of the animals against their masters and the takeover of the animal community by the pigs. This story is an allegory of the rise of the power of Joseph Stalin, a dictator. Like this novel “The case of the animal versus men before the king of the Jinn”, is a story that depicts something bigger than the arguments of master slave relationships between animals and humankind. Although this story can be interpreted differently, considering the time period and the arguments made by humans and animals, we can surmise that the humans the characteristics of fulfilling worldly desires and using reasoning …show more content…

The animals argue that god vouchsafed kindness and blessing, and everyone is God’s slave. In this argument they also refer to God as “one, unique, alone, changeless, ever-abiding, and eternal, who was before all beings.” From this, we can see that the animals regard God as the one and only being depicting their religious leaning. By arguing that if animals are the slaves of humans so are the stars and moon the slaves as well, since God created everyone. As the argument continues, we see that animal’s counterclaim is much stronger than …show more content…

Again the animals do not present any philosophical rationale to win their arguments; instead they say that God created all creatures in different ways, some with an erect shape others with big ears or long necks for their own needs, showing the acceptance of the one and only by the animals and not humans. Humans also claimed was that they are masters because they buy, sell and feed animals, so they are masters who have compassion, but the animals say no it is not out of compassion they feed the animals but out of their own benefits to use the animals for their own good. If they had compassion then they wouldn't have separated animal’s families and killed them. Another argument that humans argue about is that humans have the ability to be resurrected and opportunity to reach garden of fruits after death. The nightingale argued that they also have the even chance of suffering if they go to hell, but animals do not have to face heaven or hell after that. This stability of their future makes them superior to