In many movies and books the director does not fully grasp the concept of the book or vise versa. For example, in the Giver many things from the book were missing in the movie as well as in the Hunger Game series. All films compared to the actual text will have many divergent aspects in both. In Orwell 's Animal Farm and in the 1999 movie have many distinctive qualities about one another. To begin with, the film had many different aspects it went about and took detours that the book did not do. First off, in the film it had a specific part the book failed to mention but the movie filmed it. In the book Old Major was pronounced dead during his sleep. Everyone just went with it and never saw his actually dead. Now, during the film Old Major was shot from the top of the barn and fell out. In both scenarios something vibrantly different occurred and it shows how productions on a screen and productions on paper are going to contact each other a lot. Each director has a distinctive aspect that they go about to recreate a …show more content…
It is the fact that throughout the whole entire book it did not mention the animals were able to watch television. They thought it was the Man who watched it only and it was a humanistic thing to do. The film contradicts this when it shows all the animals in the barn watching television. They also make a commercial in the barn on Animal Farm showing how perfect it is. Then again in the book there was no participation of this sort throughout the novel. Therefore, this further infers how there are many various interpretations in both film and book. To even further elaborate how different it was the novel and film were in divergent point of views. The whole book was based on Orwell’s actual interpretation of the Russian Revolution. In the film it was through Jessie’s point of view, making this another contradicting thing that can be noticed between the book and