ipl-logo

Animal Testing: The Humane Thing To Do

2310 Words10 Pages

Human Based Testing: The Humane Thing To Do Animal testing has existed in research since the time of Aristotle, famous philosopher and scientist, who conducted tests on animals. It is understandable that Aristotle used animal testing as in those days there existed no technological alternatives that could be used to execute experiments (Hajar [Page 1]). In the times of Aristotle, there was no modern medicine and scientists did not understand even the basics of the human body. So it is only logical that in those days scientists concluded that the most efficient way to conduct experiments was through testing on animals. However, today the use of animals in research cannot be justified as there are existing alternatives that are more viable than …show more content…

Because most countries do not report their use of animals in lab experiments, the total numbers are expected to be far higher than reported. The lack of accountability present in animal testing is only one example of the flaws in the animal testing method. As scientists, it is our duty to be mindful of the impact of our actions and this includes properly accounting of all animals affected by animal testing. Because of animal testing, over 115 million animals are given no say in what testing methods are used on them and furthermore not many laws are in place ensuring their safety. This brutality is disregarded and the use of animal testing still prevails. The ethical advantages of human based testing is not a divisive topic; there are no animals involuntarily harmed through human based testing and all human test subjects that are used in scientific research are volunteers. However, the Animal welfare act provides very minimal protection for animals and it is the only law that is in place to protect animals undergoing scientific experiments ("Harm and Suffering"). In animal testing, animals that are used in scientific experiments are subject to being injected with disease, poisoned to test toxicity, undergoing electric shock, repeated breeding, high levels of stress, etc. To replace the use of such brutal testing methods, labs are switching to more humane forms of testing. For example, CeeTox is a lab that employs human based testing methods to test cosmetics and other potentially dangerous chemicals. The use of human cell cultures replaces the need for testing on animals using harmful methods such as inserting dangerous chemicals into their body parts. Furthermore this lab collaborates with the Food and Drug

Show More
Related
936 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests.

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

The inhumane act of testing products on virtuous and uninvolved animals needs to be recalled and eliminated. This belief has caused many disputes and debates for me. Animal testing has pros and cons such as any other controversial topic. This practice has granted science with many life-saving cures and treatments, but the use of animals for finding issues in products recently became unnecessary. New sciences and abilities of medicine around the world allow a different approach such as experimenting with human cells, rather a living organism.

Read More
2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, is the use of non-human animals in developmental experiments in order to determine the safety of substances such as food or drugs. In the past decade, the practice of animal testing has been a very controversial topic for a number of reasons. First, those who oppose animal testing argue that it results in the captivity and/or killing of many innocent animals. Second, they argue that the process can be very expensive and oftentimes the substances tested may never be used for anything useful. Lastly, those who oppose animal testing argue that it is simply unethical; why should it be okay to better human lives at the expense of animal lives?

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

According to Murnaghn (2018) There are various upsides and drawbacks to the demonstration of Animal testing. Sadly, neither appear to totally tip the scale to a side that fulfills everyone’s unique perspectives including the general populace, government and medical personals. An expected 26 million animals are utilized each year in the United States for medical testing. Animals are utilized to create restorative medicines, to decide the lethality of pharmaceuticals, while checking the wellbeing of the items bound for human utilization, and other biomedical Research.

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

“More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled, and abused in other ways in U.S. labs each year” (“Top Five Shocking”). Animal testing has become a deeply divided subject, with strong justification supporting each side. The debate regarding the ethics of this controversial practice is ongoing. Supporters of animal experimentation argue the viewpoint in which it must continue because of the enormous scientific research that animal models provide. Others, however, insist that all animal experimentation should come to an end.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Using animals for testing has been said to be unethical and cruel and unusual abuse. An estimated amount of 26 million animals are used each year for testing. Animal testing is abuse towards the animals,they don’t use protected animals, and the results are concluded to be inaccurate. Most people don’t really know what happens to the animals when they have to go through testing. They have to be put through many different torturous tests until they are left screaming and crying in pain.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Scientists all over the world use animals to test products for people. Over 100 million animals are tested on each year, in the US alone! Animal rights organizations, such as the PETA, SAEN, and others, have been fighting this practice almost since it began. Their argument is that testing on animals is ethically and morally wrong. However, there are more reasons why it should be stopped than just ethics.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

Everyday, non-human animals are being harmed and killed for medical training, biology lessons, and chemical, cosmetics, drug, food testing. It is estimated that 26 million animals are being used yearly for scientific and commercial testing, in the United States alone. The public debate between scientists and animal rights supporters has been happening since the seventeenth century about whether the use of animals in research through experimentation is right. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to the process of performing procedures on non-human animals for research purposes, ---Animals have been used innumerable times throughout the history of biomedical research. Utilizing animals to expand our knowledge on numerous

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

An estimated 100 million animals are exploited in biomedical, aeronautic, automotive, military, agricultural, and cognitive research and in consumer product testing. The U.S. is the only country in the world that does not include within its animal welfare laws and regulations the rats, mice and birds who are subjected to research and testing. The federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was amended in 1970 to include all warm-blooded animals who are commonly experimented upon. Animal testing is a very debatable issue. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane because the animals are forced to do things they don 't want to.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.

Read More

More about Animal Testing: The Humane Thing To Do

Open Document