Annotated Bibliography

1654 Words7 Pages

Leeman, J. (2015). Heritage language education and identity in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 100-119. doi:10.1017/S0267190514000245. This article examines recent research on identity and heritage language education in the United States. It is divided into four sections related to identity. The first section discusses the simultaneous development of heritage language education as a field and growth of interest in identity and language learning. Section two critically examines the terms ‘heritage language and heritage language education’ as well as ‘heritage language learner’ as a category of identity. Section three revises empirical studies conducted within the past five years which include survey-based research …show more content…

She suggests including examination of how heritage language educational policy and practice impacts those identities. In this form, research can provide insights on how to improve heritage language pedagogies in order to recognize and value learners’ identities and promoting their investment in the heritage language. Leeman, J., Rabin, L. & Román-Mendoza, E. (2011). Identity and Activism in Heritage Language Education. The Modern Language Journal, 95: 481–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01237.x According to Leeman, Rabin, & Román-Mendoza, identity is at the core of heritage language education. This paper is focused on the analysis of the different historical efforts to place heritage language at the center of educational policy. The main topics are identity, agency, and advocacy; especially in Spanish as a heritage language. The theoretical perspective that supports Leeman, Rabin, & Román-Mendoza’s study is that of critical pedagogy as a source of agency and social …show more content…

For further research, the researcher recommends a more in-depth analysis of how different classroom context are constructed. It will help to determine how to cultivate a ‘third space’, For this purposes, Showstack takes Baquedano-López ‘third space’s’ definition which is a space of negotiation of knowledge, positionality, and competing discourses (p. 22). In addition, the researcher suggests to the continual study of linguistic identities of HLL, she proposes a study of how bilingual and bicultural students construct discourses differently in a variety of social contexts outside the