ipl-logo

Anselm Of Canterbury's Analysis

301 Words2 Pages
In relation to the Aquinas’ second proof, Anselm of Canterbury created the ontological argument as evidence for the existence of God. This philosophy suggests that when an unbeliever hears the term “God,” they immediately have an understanding what the term “God” means. Consequently, they understand what they understand (e.g. I know what I know, because I know it). Looking specifically at Abrahamic religions, God is considered to be greater than anything that can be imagined, and is supremely perfect. This Ultimate Reality cannot simply exist in thought or idea because existence in reality is greater. If God only exists in human understanding, there leaves a possibility that something greater can be conceived. In this sense, there is an implied
Show More
Related
458 Words | 2 Pages

What phrase does Anselm use to designate God? Explain why he formulates his designation in this way. Do you think this is an appropriate way to speak of God? The Phrase he used was “God is that than which no greater can be conceived”. There are two reasons as to why Anselm words this the way he does, reason one is the idea that “ no greater can be conceived” he doesn’t want you to be able to think about something greater hence the idea that no greater can be thought of by a person.

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

Summary: In book 2 of Anselm 's Cur Deus Homo, Anselm and Bobo continue their conversation. Anselm starts off by stating that God’s intention for humans was to have forever happiness and to have eternal love for God and to put him before everything else. He also mentioned that if a person never sinned, they would never die. However, If a person does sin, they will die and become resurrected from the dead.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

The ontological argument states that perfection is a part of the concept of God, and that perfection entails existence, and so the concept of God entails God’s existence. However, it can be argued that if God is an infinite goodness, then its contrary, evil, should not exist. Alas, there is evil in the world, and, therefore, God cannot exist. The ontological argument also seeks to demonstrate that God exists on the basis of concept alone. Pascal’s Wager attempts to justify the belief in God with an

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

Maybe we, here on our desolate planet, are the consequence of some Teleological argument, would not a similar argument maintain the presence of our God. On the off chance that they existed in this universe, and were as intricate a being as to have the capacity to make the world and all that live upon it would they additionally not be required to have a maker, or to have been composed itself. Furthermore, if that is the situation, who plans gods? Would this not then require some interminable circle of celestial originators. It is easy to state the God exists outside our universe and accordingly is not held to similar principles that administer presence here yet then that leaves the topic of the occasion of the undesigned presence of

Read More
1083 Words | 5 Pages

It is covered in the first section of the book. He accomplishes this by stating that the book's purpose is "to demonstrate through rational argument that the existence of the one thing that is absolute and true God's existence is more reliable than any other fact. " Anselm then continues by explaining that the concept of "that which is greater" is the cornerstone of the logical arguments that will get used to demonstrate that God does exist. Anselm argued that God must exist because God is beyond human comprehension. After that, Anselm strengthens his case by utilizing various devices from the art of rhetoric.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

Anselm’s argument is based on this known definition of the concept of God alone. Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is based on his foundation of knowledge, logic. Humans have the idea in their minds of infinite perfection. Humans also have the idea of themselves as inferior to this idea as imperfect. For humans to have the idea of infinite perfection, there must be truth in the reason for them having this idea.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

In Saint Thomas Aquinas argument the second way, Aquinas argues for the existence of God, making use of efficient causes and premises to help us conclude that God exists. In the following words I would argue that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God exists. Aquinas second way is an argument that God is the first cause and he is essential to everything on earth because nothing would have the power to fuel its self without the intermediate cause which is God. An example is a painter using a paintbrush to paint as he moves his hand, paint is applied on the wall but if he stops, the paint would not fly from the brush to the wall, stopping

Read More
213 Words | 1 Pages

The Ontological Argument argues that because God is perfect and unlimited, he must exist, even in nonbelievers; existing is a quality of perfection. The problem of evil is significant because most people base their morality and values on whether or not they

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

Before restating the Anselm’s argument for the existence of God, it is important to understand who Anselm was and what might have compelled him to come up with the ontological argument for the existence of God. Anselm’s background information will be helpful in evaluating the validity and reliability of his arguments. Anselm was born in Italy in c. 1033. In 1063, he entered the famous monastery. In 1093, he moved to England, having been appointed Archbishop of Canterbury.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

However, one of the arguments is superior ant that is the ontological argument. The Ontological argument is the stronger of the two due to the fact that it is based in pure logic and reasoning. The major premise of the Ontological argument is about what God is. In the Abrahamic tradition God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent.

Read More
1411 Words | 6 Pages

Secondly, the lack of complete understanding of a God that is greater than any other is the basis of Anselm’s argument. In other words, one needs not understand how it is that no other greater God exists, because it is not possible to do that. It is the concept of understanding that such a being exists that is important. As long as it is possible to have such a state, then the definition given by Anselm is

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

If we think god is perfect and superior than everything we know then anything greater than god can’t be imagined. If we think god as not

Read More
1537 Words | 7 Pages

How can the created understand the Creator? If the human mind can successfully comprehend God, would that not mean that the human mind was greater than God? If any definition of God looses the element of mystery, can it be a true

Read More

More about Anselm Of Canterbury's Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document