ipl-logo

Anti-Democratic Vs Federalist

197 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The importance of the us constitution

The Federalist Papers v Democracy Were the Federalist papers anti-democratic? Were the founders against the conception of democracy as we now understand it, or was it an issue of definition assignment? What did the terms Republican, and democratic mean to the founders? Knowing what definitions certain words held during the founding era is essential to understanding the thought process of our forefathers. Another issue to consider is whether or not the Constitution itself is democratic. Due to the immense impact the Federalist papers had on the ratifying of the original Constitution, if the Constitution is found to be anti-democratic in nature then it can be inferred that the document that helped in its passing is inherently anti-democratic.
Show More
Related
524 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Modern day use the Federalist Papers to interpret the Constitution to look at the intentions of the framers and ratifies. This has been used on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs. However, there has been issues regarding the interpretation of the articles. That it is a lot of opinion that comes from the authors.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist Papers, written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison to persuade the people to accept this document that gave the government more power. These papers summarized the need for a stronger central government. While there were others who supported this idea, there were others who feared a stronger central government. These men wrote the Anti-Federalist Papers, documents that were the complete opposite of Federalist views that called for less government than that of the states. A big issue was a decision of whether to use a judiciary system, or

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

When the Constitution was first drafted in Philadelphia, 1787, there was strong opposition to it from the supporters of the Articles of Confederation, America’s first governing document. One of the starkest Anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, believed the Constitution was a gateway to power for tyrants, similarly, Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed the Constitution’s ratification, believing the Constitution would strip Americans of their freedoms and liberties. Despite their efforts, the Constitution was signed into law, and is now contrarily viewed as that which protects Americans’ rights. The US Constitution is a more democratic document than the Articles of Confederation because under the Articles there was no proportional representation, Americans did not directly vote for any representatives in Congress under the Articles, and the Constitution implemented federal income taxes were able to fund a government that could effectively protect the rights of American citizens.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans disagreed on various aspects of politics. Federalists believed in a looser interpretation of the constitution. This meant that they did not follow the constitution for what it strictly said, but rather they interpreted the constitution with the belief that there were implications within the constitution. For example, Hamilton believed that the construction of the bank was constitutional, for it was implied within the constitution (Document

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

It was no longer about states or abroad country, but rather a contract between all Americans under 1 nation. In a meantime, the Federalist Papers provided strong and rational justifications in that every decision should made by the Constitutional Convention, and also persuaded Americans that by arranging less power in people’s hands, the federal government could have a higher chance to protect people. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalist delegates argued that the government gave too much power to the federal government, while seizing too much power away from local and state governments. There were three kinds of Anti-Federalists.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

After the Constitution was written by the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, all the individual states of America had to be convinced for its ratification. But, opponents, named "Anti-Federalists" opposed against the Constitution's ratification for multiple reasons: some thought that the Constitution would "take away the power from individual states", others desired "an even more centralized government with a single popularly elected government" and finally, some seeked for a Bill of Rights to "protect individuals liberties", in fear of undermining "the claims of slaveholders or other property owners". James Jay, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison therefore wrote the Federalist Papers, eighty-five anonymous essays , in order to reduce the fears of Anti-Federalists and promote the Constitution's ratification. These papers described the importance

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

At the time the Constitution was created, the number of Anti- Federalists compared to Federalists was relatively the same (Doc A). Because of this, both opinions were well represented at the Constitutional Convention. When the constitution was ratified, in some ways it may have seemed that it was based mostly on the Federalists’ beliefs. However, it

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Papers, a term that emerged in the twentieth century, are a collection of 85 essays published from October 1787 through August 1788. They were then compiled and published in two volumes called The Federalist in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. These documents provided support for the ratification of the United States Constitution. They articulated a compelling version of the philosophy and motivation proposed by the new system of government presented by the Constitution. “The Federalist Papers were published and circulated in order to bolster support, educate and advocate for the ratification of the Constitution.”

Read More
2158 Words | 9 Pages

The Federalist Papers represent one of the most significant contributions to American political thought. Penned by three of the Founding Fathers—John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton—these papers served as a compelling argument in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution, which was drafted during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. The purpose of this collection was to influence public opinion in support of the Constitution's adoption by providing insight into its principles, structure, and benefits. At the heart of the Federalist Papers is the assertion that a strong central government, as outlined in the proposed Constitution, is essential for the stability, prosperity, and security of the fledgling nation.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

The views on Federalist vs. Democratic:Republican Party Are you with the Democratic:Republican or Federalist party? Well there is many differences and similarities. The Federalist are more of a strong federal government and the Democratic:Republican were wanting more of a strong state government. Also, the Federalist were a Loose Interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic:Republican were the opposite, they were Strict Interpretation of the Constitution.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti Federalist The anti-federalist papers were written document about why the idea of federalist is bad. three problems they had with the Constitution were the president as military king, what congress can do; what a state can not, bill of rights. These were only three of the issues I found that the anti-federalist had with the constitution. The first paper I found was the The President As Military King, anti-federalist paper #74.

Read More

More about Anti-Democratic Vs Federalist

Related Topics

Open Document