ipl-logo

Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

456 Words2 Pages

Let me start with what Antifederalist are: The Antifederalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. In the approval debate, the Anti-Federalists conflicted the Constitution. Anti-federalists complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The constitution that was written September 17, 1787 was poorly written with weaknesses. The Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. The Weaknesses of the Articles …show more content…

So, that way the government will fall into the hands of the few rich people, which ones were in command seemed like many. The rich thought of themselves above the rest of the people poor and middle classed which made them think and act as if they were entitled to more respect. They believed they were above all and could receive whatever they wanted. The representatives should have a good scene of what's going on, They should understand that their situation and their troubles. Why would a Middle class man want to run if everyone in charge is superior because of their money and who are to say that rich people are sinless? the rich are just as prone to stealing or “wicked behavior” as poor or middle class. The new constitution make more rich men eligible for an elected office than rather a poor man. It might be a scary topic but it is true the more money or more control you have you feel you have more power to do as you please and feel you can get away with more. saying poorer people don't have moral standards is already degrading the lower classes, in some cases many people aren't as educated because they don't have the financial stability to be able to be educated and what they do know they use to the best of their ability. bottom line rich or poor we all have a wicked side and federalist believe richer people are less prone to committing a crime or being wicked or having wickedly acts which isn't a proven fact and isnt

Show More
Related
265 Words | 2 Pages

The article, “The Anti-federalists Were Right”, from Mises Daily, by Gary Galles, written on Sept. 27, 2006, is about the accuracy of the outcome of the Constitution that the anti-federalists had foretold. The anti-federalists did not approve the U.S. Constitution. They feared that it would form a tyrannical central government, even though the supporters of the Constitution guaranteed that a government like that would never be created. Anti-federalists informed Americans that the Constitution would affect our freedom and the money we own. They wanted to establish the Bill of Rights to form a boundary between the rights of the people and the government.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

When the Constitution was first drafted in Philadelphia, 1787, there was strong opposition to it from the supporters of the Articles of Confederation, America’s first governing document. One of the starkest Anti-Federalists, Patrick Henry, believed the Constitution was a gateway to power for tyrants, similarly, Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed the Constitution’s ratification, believing the Constitution would strip Americans of their freedoms and liberties. Despite their efforts, the Constitution was signed into law, and is now contrarily viewed as that which protects Americans’ rights. The US Constitution is a more democratic document than the Articles of Confederation because under the Articles there was no proportional representation, Americans did not directly vote for any representatives in Congress under the Articles, and the Constitution implemented federal income taxes were able to fund a government that could effectively protect the rights of American citizens.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

In Jefferson's term, there was a political party which believed that only wealthy men should rule. People thought wealthy men were best qualified by the experience of making and managing their wealth,and to know how government could help and how it could hurt it . This was basically so they could avoid having a bad

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

In the late 18th century, America’s founding fathers would have never dreamed of being organized into different political factions: for they were not fans of them. In Federalist 10, James Madison, leading Democratic-Republican thinker, stated that he was skeptical of factions. In his Farewell Address, George Washington, the first President of the United States, warned the American public against the egotistic political factions. Both Madison and Washington believed that factions were signs of corruption. Despite the public warnings against factions, two political parties emerged from our founding fathers: the Federalists, and the Democratic-Republicans.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

Poor people were treated very treated unequally in comparison to the rich. In the book, Lies My Teacher Told Me, Loewen writes about how poor people were offered education, but weren’t given an equal opportunity for higher education. Chapter 7 of Lies My Teacher Told Me notes that rich people were treated more fairly than the poor people, more specifically with more respect and honor especially in the classroom.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Name: Jeshuwin Prabakaran Before the Constitution was approved and known as the structure of our government, we had the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was a broken system, with no central government to collect taxes or enforce law we were burying ourselves in massive debt while States taxed each other. There was no National Court System or Supreme Court which made serious cases harder to deal with often having a less just outcome. These are the few of the multiple flaws and reasons it was necessary to replace the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

The United States struggled under the Articles of Confederation, able to declare war and foreign policy, but unable to collect revenue to sustain its actions. The Constitution was designed to give more power to the national government primarily by empowering it with the responsibilities of establishing and maintaining central banking and financial policies. The national government was able to ask for monies from the states, but was not able to enforce collections of those monies needed to sustain their actions. The thirteen states essentially had recently revolted against Britain and its heavy handed tactics of collecting revenue and were almost immediately being asked to ratify and accept changes that would allow the new government to enforce funding as well.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

In times of struggle for an organized and protective government, fifty five delegates were called to ratify the amendments. The Unites States was a brand new, independent nation, but it was not at all prospering. War debt and the inability of congress to tax led to the realization that the government needed to be reformed. While it was not their original intention, these delegates ultimately created the Constitution of the United States of America. However, the constant fear of one man or group obtaining too much power still loomed.

Read More
1529 Words | 7 Pages

As the country’s first president, George Washington supplied a national sense of unity for eight years. When Washington retired, the people split into two political parties, the Federalists and Republicans, and they started the first party system in our country’s history. The national government was strengthened because the Federalists were so involved in shaping the new U.S. Constitution. However, the Antifederalists disapproved the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

When you put the two names next to each other and compare Federalist versus Anti-Federalists and what is thought of it is always a topic that has always been a bit harsh or even arguable to the people of this nation. Federalists and Anti-Federalists had extremely different points of views on how to run their nation and the way the government should be set up. Federalists had faith in our people and believed that they should be the ones running the government. They were avid believers of many things such as a strong central government, a central bank, and an even those that protect our rights, the army. Federalist no. 39 states “It is ESSENTIAL to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

Carnegie states in his review, “Wealth”, “--the man of wealth thus becoming the mere agent and trustee for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves,” (Carnegie, Doc. 4). Carnegie believes that those who are wealthy should use himself to help the community, but deserves those votes in return. They can build a loyal voter following, especially among immigrant groups, by performing such favors as providing jobs or housing. However, in the end, the political machines want loyalty at the voting polls.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

During the Revolutionary era, the birth of the U.S. Constitution gave way to the political divide between the two polarizing philosophies of Federalists and Anti-Federalists. After the economic pitfalls and decentralization the Articles of Confederation had left behind, action was taken to ameliorate its failures. With the creation of the Federalist party in by founder Alexander Hamilton, its members advocated for a stronger national government and defended the validity of the Constitution’s ratification. Contrarily, the Constitution was met with skepticism on behalf of the Anti-Federalists, who believed it would undermine state sovereignty and infringe upon their human rights. The two parties hailed from different socioeconomic backgrounds,

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism is a system of government used in the United States that divides power between the National and State governments. The U.S. constitution gives power to both the states, and the federal government, but the states cannot directly contradict the constitution. This makes it so that the broader issues are handled by the federal government, and the smaller, more local problems, go to the states. Sometimes, they must work together in order to make big things happen. A good example of this is the 1st article of the constitution.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

“Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Currently, we have both a wealthy class and common people rule. Everyone (common people) gets to vote, and those votes decide our future. But, because of their wealthy, the wealthy have an advantage when it comes to politics. They can pay a lot for the best lawyer (the best example being the OJ Simpson case) and be proven innocent because the lawyer raised reasonable doubt. Also, wealthy business owners could get the government to move a smaller business/store, using eminent domain, and place their own business at the location, using the words “public use” to tell the people it was for them.

Read More

More about Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

Open Document