Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophical arguements for if god exists
Existence of god discussion
Essays arguing the existence of god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophical arguements for if god exists
Existence of god discussion
Essays arguing the existence of god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Aquinas differs from Paley by arguing that nothing happens by chance and that all things have means and ends. He also believed in a master powerful creator (God) that directed things to their natural end. While, Paley’s arguments did not include the bible or religion. Although, since Aquinas believed that things that don’t have minds can accomplish goals but only if it is controlled with something that does have a mind with intelligence and knowledge.
Basic Belief Assignment I describe a belief as an idea that is thought to be true by a person. Beliefs have the potential to influence and determine what a person values. Religion is a main factor that defines a person’s beliefs. It is known that people share common beliefs within the same religion.
Philosophy 224 Monday/Wednesday 10-11:15 WORD COUNT In a small village, deep in the South American jungle of Guyana, two men overlook a massacre of over 900 people. Of these 900 people, about 300 were children. The men stand in silence, but only for a moment, they are philosophers… HUME: “This is truly astonishing… There is no way that Jim Jones could have been a prophet…”
The paradox of the stone heavily relies on Thomas Aquinas’s understanding of gods omnipotence. Aquinas proposes that Omnipotence is the power to do everything that is possible, not just to do anything. Aquinas breaks it down into two forms of possibilities; Relative possibility and Absolute possibility that will be discussed first in order to understand the paradox of the stone argument. Relative possibility is a power that lies within some beings, but not within others.
Descartes gave a few arguments that God exists and is real. Desocrates believed our idea of God is that God is a perfect being, he believed he is more perfect to exist than not to exist. Desocrates also believed that God is a infinite being. Descartes idea would be that God gave us this idea to type this paragraph about him so he must be real. When he thinks negative of an idea or thought he wonders if an evil demon plotted those thoughts.
In Saint Thomas Aquinas argument the second way, Aquinas argues for the existence of God, making use of efficient causes and premises to help us conclude that God exists. In the following words I would argue that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God exists. Aquinas second way is an argument that God is the first cause and he is essential to everything on earth because nothing would have the power to fuel its self without the intermediate cause which is God. An example is a painter using a paintbrush to paint as he moves his hand, paint is applied on the wall but if he stops, the paint would not fly from the brush to the wall, stopping
Under these options, one is free to follow his/her passionate nature and believe whatever one would like to believe. Concerning the existence of God, James thinks that belief in God’s existence is a valuable sort of
In Meditation 3, the Meditator is creating arguments about the existence of god. This is where Descartes explains different reasons/premises to why god exists. Throughout Meditation 3, Descartes goes back and forth with his arguments arguing one thing then creating a counter argument to it at while still focusing on the main thing which is does god exist. For those wondering whether god does really exist stay tuned into what Descartes says. The premises from the meditation that claim god doesn’t exist are weak and invalid, and fail to give enough evidence to support the thought that god does not exists, which would conclude that God does exist.
While studying in the church Aquinas discovered the works of Aristotle and began reworking them in order to fit the views of the church. He was able to accomplish this by using these writings as base to write his most widely known work titled “The Argument from Design.” In paper Aquinas sets forth several premises and one conclusion, all of which argues the question of does god exist. However, Aquinas does not outright mention God or the overall point of his premises till the very end when you get to the overall conclusion of the paper. This along with the structuring of the rest of his argument allows for several logical fallacies such as, not just appealing to faith, shifting the burden of proof, arguing from authority, begging the question, giving an argument from popularity, or arguing from the premise that something or someone caused the universe(or a self
In other words, one cannot just stack up evidence to prove or disprove God and thereby make a decision to believe in Him; one must willingly and completely by faith trust in Him regardless of the evidence. To believe in God is a decision that takes place in the heart not the mind, and then involves a commitment of the whole person to live for God. Fifthly, the Fideists stressed the importance of truth. If one is to believe in the existence of God or in anything else for that matter, truth must be the primary focus.
In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.
Descartes also formulates another argument of doubt but uses God as his object of deception instead of dreaming. He first states that we believe that there is an all-powerful God who has created us, redundant. Descartes goes on to say, that God has it in His power to make us be deceived even about matters of mathematical knowledge which we seem to understand clearly. Descartes does acknowledge his argument is controversial and brings up objections to support his argument. Some might believe God wouldn’t deceive us.
In chapter three of Aquinas for Armchair Theologians by Timothy Renick, Aquinas’s philosophy on evil in the world and the free will of humans is heavily discussed. Renick describes a very complex topic and transforms it into something the average person can read and understand. Aquinas answers the questions of whether evil exists, did God create evil, why does evil exist, and if evil exists, who or what removes it. He also answers the questions of whether humans have the free will to make decisions or has God predetermined every decision and its outcome according to his plan. While I found this article somewhat easy to follow, I can understand how some of Aquinas’s arguments can lead to debate or confusion on the nature of God, evil, and free will.
Firstly, Aquinas brings up the point that there are two types ways people trade; one virtuously and the other being unvirtuous. If a person were to gain trade in “whereby one commodity is exchanged for another, or money taken in exchange for a commodity, in order to satisfy the needs of life,” then it would be natural. This would apply to bargaining and trades among the people in society. However, the concept of investing in stocks of companies is considered the other type of trade. According to the Philosopher, the other type of profit is based on “money for money, or any commodity for money” is deserving of blame since it is for profit and not for a need.