Archetypes In An Occurrence At Owl Creek Bridge

1666 Words7 Pages

According to the dictionary, humanity is “the quality or state of being humane” (Merriam-Webster). Being humane says that we should be compassionate and generous. This is how we should be treating others, yet during times of war and strife it often seems that humanity is thrown out, leaving people in a primal state. This affects not only the soldiers actively taking part in the war effort but also those seemingly innocent bystanders. In the short story An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge by Ambrose Bierce, the author portrays a semi-omniscient narrator prescribing one such innocent. The various archetypes introduced through the settings, the temporal symbolisms, the colors, and the character types help to analyze the final thought processes of …show more content…

Unlike most archetypal stories, he does not demonstrate the characteristics of “the hero.” Instead, he portrays the farmer and the scapegoat. The farmer is a cultivator and a grower of things. In this story, Peyton’s occupation is that of “a well to do planter… a slave owner… [and] a politician” (Bierce 2). Each of these roles cultivates something. As a planter, he cultivates produce, as slave owner he cultivates future slaves, and as politician he cultivates laws. The cultivator often provides sage advice for the protagonist. This sage advice generally is simple and straightforward, much like the archetypal farmer that gives voice to it. Peyton also is the scapegoat, due to following his own advice and that of a Northern spy that informs him of the bridge’s existence. The scapegoat is the person upon “whose death in a public ceremony expiates some taint or sin of a community” (Archetypes 5). Scapegoats are an unfortunate aspect of life since many people refuse to take responsibility for their own actions, needing to place the blame on others. While Peyton does not quite fit this exactly, since he is paying for his own crimes, his death by public hanging expiates the surrounding populace from his possible sabotage. Dual archetypes, and more often more, are present within all people; no person is a but one single