ipl-logo

Argument Analysis: Torturing Animals Is A Wrong Thing

837 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critical analysis of the animal farm

Phil 102 Argument Analysis 1 Yiding Zhong / Net ID: yzhong17 09/24/2015 Premises 1.) Torturing conscious being is always wrong. 2.) Torturing puppies is a wrong thing. (from 1) 3.) Torturing pig is the same as torturing puppies. 4.) Farm castrates pig without anesthesia and cut off its tail. 5.) What the farm does causes animals, such as the pigs, to suffer. (from 4) 6.) Torturing pigs is as cruel as torturing other animals, such as puppies. 7.) What the farm has done is a wrong thing. (from 1,4,5) 8.) It is wrong for anyone to pay for a farm that torture animals. (from 7) 9.) It is also wrong for anyone to own a farm that torture animals. (from 7) 10.) It is the same thing that people torture animals with their own hand and people pay someone to do it. 11.) The farm produces meat by ways that would torture animals. 12.) Purchasing meat from the farm which tortures animal is paying other people to produce meat. 13.) Purchasing meat from farm is also a way to torture animals.(from 7,11,12) 14.) It is a wrong thing to purchase meat from farm.(from 11,13) 15.) Wrong things are pretty much the same and have no difference. Conclusions There is no diffidence for people to torture puppies and to purchase meat from farm. Explanation Form Norcross’s paper, two …show more content…

In the paper, Fred did all his torturing to the puppies only to pursue the pleasure of eating chocolate, and “this isn’t a matter of survival or health” (Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases, Pg 2). Nevertheless, eating meat is critical for human health since it is a very important source to supply human body with protein. It is indeed the matter of survival and health. As a result, eating meat from is in fact inevitable. And killing animal to get their meat becomes inevitable as well. From this point of view, purchasing meat no longer share the same stance with torturing

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'

422 Words | 2 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.

Read More

Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition Case Study

547 Words | 3 Pages

Citation: Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition 535 U.S. 234 (2002) U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Facts: The Free Speech Coalition which is a non-profit trade association of the pornography and adult entertainment industry in the United States filed suit, against the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). The child pornography prevention act prohibits and sets penalties for activities such as depicting any visual image of the sexual abuse of minors. This includes pictures, video, and even modified images with the likeness or appearance of a minor engaging in a sexual act. The Promotion, advertisement, and distribution of such works are also prohibited and have consequences.

Read More

Upton Sinclair And The Meat-Packing Industry

830 Words | 4 Pages

The book provided more distressing news of terrible practices in this industry taught to the workers so that more meat can be distributed for profit. “He wrote that workers would process dead, injured, and diseased animals after regular hours when no meat inspectors were around” (Constitutional Rights Foundation). The industry provides more meat for their customers purely for profit. This causes the industry to be influenced to sell its meat, no matter the condition it is in. The disgusting context of the conditions America’s meat was put through was brought to light, thanks to “The Jungle” and the customers of these businesses were

Read More

Summary: An Omnivore's Dilemma

1766 Words | 8 Pages

Ever since the beginning of time, meat has been a staple of the human diet. People have many reasons why they chose not to consume meat. One of the most common reasons some people chose not to eat meat is because they believe that it is unethical. There are many processes required in order to produce meat for conception, and these processes have become widely known to the public and cause a great deal of controversy. Animals are often tortured, genetically modified, and live in squalid conditions before they become the meat we put on our dinner tables.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral

755 Words | 4 Pages

This short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly

Read More

Foer Eating Animals Analysis

732 Words | 3 Pages

Jonathan Safran Foer’s Eating Animals is a book about persuasion. Foer seeks to convince his readers to take any step in reducing what he believes is the injustice of harming animals. To achieve this, Foer employs many persuasion techniques and often changes his approach when he targets specific groups. His strategies include establishing himself as an ethical authority and appealing to his readers’ emotions, morals, and reason.

Read More

Norcross's Argument Analysis

538 Words | 3 Pages

He states that Fred’s pleasures do not make it morally permissible to torture puppies. This is compared to livestock in factory farms because, they undergo the same kind of torture and abuse. His conclusion is that, torturing puppies and eating meats from factory raised cattle are one in the same and is immoral. Machan addresses two different issues in his argument, animal rights, and animal liberation. Although they are fundamentally different subjects they are both contributed to animals for the same reason.

Read More

Arguments Against Alastair Norcross

742 Words | 3 Pages

Alastair Norcross takes the position in the animal rights argument that torturing animals for their use is unacceptable. He asks to consider a case where a man, Fred, lost his ability to enjoy chocolate because he lost the ability to produce Cocoamone. Fred’s doctor tells him that a recent study shows that, when puppies are tortured and then brutally killed, they produce cocoamone that Fred can then harvest. So Fred sets up his basement where he can torture puppies and then slaughter them in order to taste chocolate again. Norcross claims that this is obviously wrong and draws a correlation between Fred’s case and the situation where we cause chickens to suffer in order to mass produce their meat.

Read More

Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More

Thesis Statement For Perdue Farm

193 Words | 1 Pages

Thesis There is a growing consent that factory farming of animals or concentrated animal feeding operations is morally

Read More

Harman's Arguments Against Killing Animals

497 Words | 2 Pages

According to Elizabeth Harman, an action that kills an animal even painlessly, is an action that harms the animal. If we indeed have strong moral reasons against causing pain to animals, Harman argues we must also have strong moral reasons against killing animals. This raises an objection to the Surprising Claim, which states that we have strong reasons against causing intense pain to animals, but only weak reasons against killing animals. The First View claims that killing an animal deprives it of a positive benefit (future life) but does not harm the animal.

Read More

Explain Why Animal Abusers Should Be Stricter Punishment

1005 Words | 5 Pages

“Within the Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life” (U.S. code of law). We live in a country where taking a life is a serious crime, unless that it 's a life of an animal, which can neither speak nor understand the horrifying actions that are being carried out. Pets can think, feel and act, just like people do, they’re alive. If animals are alive, like humans, then why should taking away their life result in a maximum 2 years in prison and a fine that never exceeds 1,000 dollars?

Read More

Comparison Of Social Darwinism And The Social Gospel Movement

583 Words | 3 Pages

Social Darwinism and the Social Gospel Movement are contrasting systems of belief. Social Darwinism suggests that people are in the social or financial state that they deserve. This appealed to the work ethic that anyone could do well if they worked hard enough. For some, this was a source of inspiration to work hard to excel.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

1421 Words | 6 Pages

The meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Animal Abuse

1381 Words | 6 Pages

Animal Cruelty Have you ever wondered how much atrocious animal treatments are occurring around the world? The average number of animal abuse cases reported in the media each year is 1,920 according to a study conducted this year by Statistic Brain Research Institute. Moreover, a lot of animals struggle around the globe because they are often beaten, neglected and hunted, which forces them to fight for survival. Helpless animals continue to be exploited by humans and are still constantly being robbed of their lives. Thus, animal cruelty is the killing, exploiting and neglecting the needs of animals that are causing extinction and nonessential suffering.

Read More

More about Argument Analysis: Torturing Animals Is A Wrong Thing

Related Topics

Open Document